OSA's Digital Library

Journal of the Optical Society of America A

Journal of the Optical Society of America A


  • Vol. 17, Iss. 4 — Apr. 1, 2000
  • pp: 697–710

Separating the chaff from the wheat: possible origins of the oblique effect

Matthias S. Keil and Gabriel Cristóbal  »View Author Affiliations

JOSA A, Vol. 17, Issue 4, pp. 697-710 (2000)

View Full Text Article

Enhanced HTML    Acrobat PDF (994 KB)

Browse Journals / Lookup Meetings

Browse by Journal and Year


Lookup Conference Papers

Close Browse Journals / Lookup Meetings

Article Tools



The oblique effect refers to a better perception of horizontal and vertical image features as compared with the perception at oblique angles. This effect can be observed in both animals and humans. Recent neurophysiological data suggest that the basis of this effect lies in the structure of the primary visual cortex, where more cortical area is devoted to processing contours with angles at horizontal and vertical orientations (cardinal orientations). It has been suggested that this cortical feature has developed according to the statistical properties of natural scenes. To examine this hypothesis in more detail, we established six image classes and categorized the images with respect to their semantical contents. From the images the oriented energy was calculated by using the corresponding power spectra. We defined simple measures for the degree (cardinal versus oblique energy ratio) and the skewness or anisotropy (aligned energy ratio) of the alignment of energy at horizontal and vertical orientations. Our results provide evidence that (1) alignment depends strongly on the environment, (2) the degree of alignment drops off characteristically at higher frequencies, and (3) in natural images there is on the average an anisotropy in the distribution of energy at the cardinal orientations (i.e., a difference between the amounts of vertical energy and horizontal energy). In light of our results, we further discuss whether the observed cortical anisotropy has its origin in phylogeny or ontogeny.

© 2000 Optical Society of America

OCIS Codes
(100.2000) Image processing : Digital image processing
(100.2960) Image processing : Image analysis

Original Manuscript: June 1, 1999
Revised Manuscript: November 17, 1999
Manuscript Accepted: October 18, 1999
Published: April 1, 2000

Matthias S. Keil and Gabriel Cristóbal, "Separating the chaff from the wheat: possible origins of the oblique effect," J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 17, 697-710 (2000)

Sort:  Author  |  Year  |  Journal  |  Reset  


  1. J. P. Jones, L. A. Palmer, “An evaluation of the two-dimensional Gabor filter model of simple receptive fields in cat striate cortex,” J. Neurophysiol. 58, 1233–1258 (1987). [PubMed]
  2. S. Apelle, “Perception and discrimination as a function of stimulus orientation: the oblique effect in man and animals,” Psychol. Bull. 78, 226–278 (1972).
  3. I. P. Howard, Human Visual Orientation (Wiley, New York, 1982).
  4. B. A. Olshausen, D. J. Field, “Wavelet-like receptive fields emerge from a network that learns sparse codes for natural images,” Nature (London) 381, 607–609 (1996). [CrossRef]
  5. F. Sengpiel, P. Stawinski, T. Bonhoeffer, “Influence of experience on orientation maps in cat visual cortex,” Nature Neurosci. 2, 727–732 (1999). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. B. Chapman, T. Bonhoeffer, “Overrepresentation of horizontal and vertical orientations preferences in developing ferret area 17,” Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 95, 2609–2614 (1998). [CrossRef]
  7. D. Coppola, L. White, D. Fitzpatrick, D. Purves, “Unequal representation of cardinal and oblique contours in ferret visual cortex,” Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 95, 2621–2623 (1998). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. J. D. Schall, D. J. Vitek, A. G. Leventha, “Retinal constraints on orientation specificity in cat visual cortex,” J. Neurosci. 6, 823–836 (1986). [PubMed]
  9. D. C. Linden, R. W. Guillery, J. Cucchiaro, “The dorsal lateral geniculate nucleus of the normal ferret and its postnatal development,” J. Comp. Neurol. 203, 189–211 (1981). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. M. I. Law, K. R. Zahs, M. P. Stryker, “Organization of the primary visual cortex (area 17) in the ferret,” J. Comp. Neurol. Power 278, 157–180 (1988). [CrossRef]
  11. E. Switkes, M. J. Mayer, J. A. Sloan, “Spatial frequency analysis of the visual environment: anisotropy and the carpentered environment hypothesis,” Vision Res. 18, 1393–1399 (1978). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. D. Coppola, H. Purves, A. McCoy, D. Purves, “The distribution of oriented contours in the real world,” Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 95, 4002–4006 (1998). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. A. van der Schaaf, J. H. van Hateren, “Modeling the power spectra of natural images: statistics and information,” Vision Res. 36, 2759–2770 (1996). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. D. J. Field, “Relations between the statistics of natural images and the response properties of cortical cells,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 14, 2379–2394 (1987). [CrossRef]
  15. http://hlab.phys.rug.nl/archive.html .
  16. F. W. Campbell, D. G. Green, “Optical and retinal factors affecting visual resolution,” J. Physiol. (London) 181, 576–593 (1965).
  17. J. H. van Hateren, A. van der Schaaf, “Independent component filters of natural images compared with simple cells in primary visual cortex,” Proc. R. Soc. London Ser. B 265, 359–366 (1998). [CrossRef]
  18. http://hlab.phys.rug.nl/imlib/peaks.html .
  19. D. L. Ruderman, “Statistics of natural images: scaling in the woods,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 73, 814–817 (1994). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. M. C. Crair, D. C. Gillespie, M. P. Stryker, “The role of visual experience in the development of columns in cat visual cortex,” Science 279, 566–570 (1998). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

Cited By

Alert me when this paper is cited

OSA is able to provide readers links to articles that cite this paper by participating in CrossRef's Cited-By Linking service. CrossRef includes content from more than 3000 publishers and societies. In addition to listing OSA journal articles that cite this paper, citing articles from other participating publishers will also be listed.

« Previous Article  |  Next Article »

OSA is a member of CrossRef.

CrossCheck Deposited