OSA's Digital Library

Journal of the Optical Society of America A

Journal of the Optical Society of America A


  • Vol. 18, Iss. 9 — Sep. 1, 2001
  • pp: 2209–2219

Visual response saturation to orientation contrast in the perception of texture boundary

Isamu Motoyoshi and Shin’ya Nishida  »View Author Affiliations

JOSA A, Vol. 18, Issue 9, pp. 2209-2219 (2001)

View Full Text Article

Acrobat PDF (716 KB)

Browse Journals / Lookup Meetings

Browse by Journal and Year


Lookup Conference Papers

Close Browse Journals / Lookup Meetings

Article Tools



We analyzed how the visual response to orientation modulation in texture patterns varied as a function of the magnitude of orientation contrast. Using a contrast-discrimination technique, we measured threshold increments of orientation contrast (the orientation contrast required for discriminating between two textures) at various pedestal-orientation contrasts. The orientation-contrast-response function estimated for a step-orientation contrast, which produces a vivid percept of surface boundaries, saturated at approximately 30° (experiment 1). The saturation was still evident even when the strength of the step-orientation contrast was reduced by orientation noise (experiment 2), but no strong saturation was found for textures that did not produce a vivid percept of surface boundaries (experiment 3). These results are consistent with the notion that orientation-based texture segregation involves the generation of a neural representation of the surface boundary whose strength is nearly independent of the magnitude of orientation contrast.

© 2001 Optical Society of America

OCIS Codes
(330.5000) Vision, color, and visual optics : Vision - patterns and recognition
(330.5510) Vision, color, and visual optics : Psychophysics
(330.6100) Vision, color, and visual optics : Spatial discrimination

Isamu Motoyoshi and Shin’ya Nishida, "Visual response saturation to orientation contrast in the perception of texture boundary," J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 18, 2209-2219 (2001)

Sort:  Author  |  Year  |  Journal  |  Reset


  1. J. Beck, “Effect of orientation and of shape similarity on perceptual grouping,” Percept. Psychophys. 1, 300–302 (1966).
  2. B. Julesz, “Textons: the elements of texture perception, and their interactions,” Nature 290, 91–97 (1981).
  3. J. P. Frisby, Seeing (Oxford U. Press, Oxford, UK, 1979).
  4. D. Marr, Vision: A Computational Investigation into the Human Representation and Processing of Visual Information (Freeman, New York, 1982).
  5. S. Grossberg, “3-D vision and figure–ground separation by visual cortex,” Percept. Psychophys. 55, 48–120 (1994).
  6. N. Graham, “Complex channels, early local non-linearities, and normalization in texture segregation,” in M. S. Landy and J. A. Movshon, eds., Computational Models of Visual Processing (MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass., 1994).
  7. J. Malik and P. Perona, “Preattentive texture discrimination with early vision mechanisms,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 7, 923–932 (1990).
  8. J. R. Bergen and E. H. Adelson, “Early vision and texture perception,” Nature 333, 363–364 (1988).
  9. M. S. Landy and J. R. Bergen, “Texture segregation and orientation gradient,” Vision Res. 31, 679–691 (1991).
  10. B. S. Rubenstein and D. Sagi, “Spatial variability as a limiting factor in texture-discrimination tasks: implications for performance asymmetries,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 7, 1632–1643 (1990).
  11. B. S. Rubenstein and D. Sagi, “Effects of foreground scale in texture discrimination tasks: performance is size, shape, and content specific,” Spatial Vision 7, 293–310 (1993).
  12. F. A. Kingdom, D. Keeble, and B. Moulden, “Sensitivity to orientation modulation in micropattern-based textures,” Vision Res. 35, 79–91 (1995).
  13. F. A. Kingdom and D. R. Keeble, “A linear systems approach to the detection of both abrupt and smooth spatial variations in orientation-defined textures,” Vision Res. 36, 409–420 (1996).
  14. R. Gurnsey and D. S. Laundry, “Texture discrimination with and without abrupt texture gradients,” Can. J. Psychol. 46, 306–332 (1992).
  15. H. C. Nothdurft, “Orientation sensitivity and texture segmentation in patterns with different line orientation,” Vision Res. 25, 551–560 (1985).
  16. H. C. Nothdurft, “Texture segmentation and pop-out from orientation contrast,” Vision Res. 31, 1073–1078 (1991).
  17. D. Sagi and B. Julesz, “Short-range limitation on detection of feature differences,” Spatial Vision 2, 39–49 (1987).
  18. D. Sagi, “Detection of an orientation singularity in Gabor textures: effect of signal density and spatial-frequency,” Vision Res. 30, 1377–1388 (1990).
  19. S. S. Wolfson and M. S. Landy, “Examining edge- and region-based texture analysis mechanisms,” Vision Res. 38, 439–446 (1998).
  20. A. Sutter and N. Graham, “Investigating simple and complex mechanisms in texture segregation using the speed–accuracy tradeoff method,” Vision Res. 35, 2825–2843 (1995).
  21. A. Sutter and D. Hwang, “A comparison of the dynamics of simple (Fourier) and complex (non-Fourier) mechanisms in texture segregation,” Vision Res. 39, 1943–1962 (1999).
  22. H. C. Nothdurft, “Salience from feature contrast: temporal properties of saliency mechanisms,” Vision Res. 40, 2421–2435 (2000).
  23. I. Motoyoshi and S. Nishida, “Temporal resolution of orientation-based segregation,” Vision Res. 41, 2089–2105 (2001).
  24. F. W. Campbell and J. G. Robson, “On the application of Fourier analysis to the visibility of gratings,” J. Physiol. 197, 551–556 (1968).
  25. H. R. Wilson and J. R. Bergen, “A four mechanism model for threshold spatial vision,” Vision Res. 19, 19–32 (1979).
  26. D. Regan, “Orientation discrimination for bars defined by orientation texture,” Perception 24, 1131–1138 (1995).
  27. R. Gray and D. Regan, “Spatial frequency discrimination and detection characteristics for gratings defined by orientation texture,” Vision Res. 38, 2601–2617 (1998).
  28. H. C. Nothdurft, “The conspicuousness of orientation and motion contrast,” Spatial Vision 7, 341–363 (1993).
  29. H. C. Nothdurft, “Salience from feature contrast: additivity across dimensions,” Vision Res. 40, 1183–1201 (2000).
  30. J. Nachmias and R. V. Sansbury, “Grating contrast: discrimination may be better than detection,” Vision Res. 14, 1039–1042 (1974).
  31. G. E. Legge and J. M. Foley, “Contrast masking in human vision,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. 70, 1458–1471 (1980).
  32. J. M. Foley, “Human luminance pattern-vision mechanisms: masking experiments require a new model,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 11, 1710–1719 (1994).
  33. J. Ross and H. D. Speed, “Contrast adaptation and contrast masking in human vision,” Philos. Trans. R. Soc. London, Ser. B 246, 61–69 (1991).
  34. H. R. Wilson and R. Humanski, “Spatial frequency adaptation and contrast gain control,” Vision Res. 33, 1133–1149 (1993).
  35. The randomization of the mean orientation was expected to increase the trial-to-trial variation in the subjects’ discrimination performance because the sensitivity to orientation contrasts is known to depend profoundly on the mean orientation of the elements in the texture (see Refs. 60 and 61 below). This manipulation, however, was necessary to prevent subjects from using absolute orientation as a discrimination cue, and as described below, the errors in the threshold data possibly due to this factor were not large enough to hide the general tendencies of the results.
  36. H. Levitt, “Transformed up–down methods in psychoacoustics,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. 49, 467–477 (1971).
  37. We conducted experiment 1 first, experiment 3 second, and experiment 2 last, so the poor discrimination performance at high pedestal-orientation contrasts in experiment 2 (with noise) is not likely due to a lack of training.
  38. I. Ohzawa, G. Sclar, and R. D. Freeman, “Contrast gain control in the cat’s visual system,” J. Neurophysiol. 54, 651–667 (1985).
  39. D. J. Heeger, “Normalization of cell responses in cat striate cortex,” Visual Neurosci. 9, 181–197 (1992).
  40. M. J. Morgan, R. M. Ward, and E. Castet, “Visual search for a tilted target: tests of spatial uncertainty models,” Q. J. Exp. Psychol. A 51, 347–370 (1998).
  41. S. C. Dakin and R. J. Watt, “The computation of orientation statistics from visual texture,” Vision Res. 37, 3181–3192 (1997).
  42. S. C. Dakin, “Orientation variance as a quantifier of structure in texture,” Spatial Vision 12, 1–30 (1999).
  43. K. Nakayama and S. Shimojo, “Toward a neural understanding of visual surface representation,” Cold Spring Harbor Symp. Quant. Biol. 15, 911–924 (1990).
  44. Z. J. He and K. Nakayama, “Perceiving textures: beyond filtering,” Vision Res. 34, 151–162 (1994).
  45. J. M. Wolfe, “‘Effortless’ texture segmentation and ‘parallel’ visual search are not the same thing,” Vision Res. 32, 757–763 (1992).
  46. H. R. Wilson, “Discrimination of contour curvature: data and theory,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 2, 1191–1199 (1985).
  47. H. R. Wilson and W. A. Richards, “Mechanisms of contour curvature discrimination,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 6, 106–115 (1989).
  48. D. Kramer and M. Fahle, “A simple mechanism for detecting low curvatures,” Vision Res. 36, 1411–1419 (1996).
  49. D. W. Heeley and H. M. Buchanan-Smith, “Mechanisms specialized for the perception of image geometry,” Vision Res. 36, 3607–3627 (1996).
  50. H. P. Snippe and J. J. Koenderink, “Discrimination of geometric angle in the fronto-parallel plane,” Spatial Vision 8, 309–328 (1994).
  51. S. Chen and D. M. Levi, “Angle judgement: is the whole the sum of its parts?” Vision Res. 36, 1721–1235 (1996).
  52. D. Regan, R. Gray, and S. J. Hamstra, “Evidence for a neural mechanism that encodes angles,” Vision Res. 36, 323–330 (1996).
  53. S. W. Zucker and L. Iverson, “From orientation selection to optical flow,” Comput. Vision Graph. Image Process. 37, 196–220 (1987).
  54. Y. Hel Or and S. W. Zucker, “Texture fields and texture flows: sensitivity to differences,” Spatial Vision 4, 131–139 (1989).
  55. D. R. Keeble, F. A. Kingdom, and M. J. Morgan, “The orientational resolution of human texture perception,” Vision Res. 37, 2993–3007 (1997).
  56. D. R. Keeble, F. A. Kingdom, B. Moulden, and M. J. Morgan, “Detection of orientationally multimodal textures,” Vision Res. 35, 1991–2005 (1995).
  57. F. Wilkinson, H. R. Wilson, and C. Habak, “Detection and recognition of radial frequency patterns,” Vision Res. 38, 3555–3568 (1998).
  58. R. F. Hess, Y. Z. Wang, and S. C. Dakin, “Are judgements of circularity local or global?” Vision Res. 39, 4354–4360 (1999).
  59. D. C. Rogers-Ramachandran and V. S. Ramachandran, “Psychophysical evidence for boundary and surface systems in human vision,” Vision Res. 38, 71–77 (1998).
  60. D. H. Foster and S. Westland, “Orientation contrast vs. orientation in line-target detection,” Vision Res. 35, 733–738 (1995).
  61. T. Meigen, W. D. Lagreze, and M. Bach, “Asymmetries in preattentive line detection,” Vision Res. 34, 3103–3109 (1994).

Cited By

Alert me when this paper is cited

OSA is able to provide readers links to articles that cite this paper by participating in CrossRef's Cited-By Linking service. CrossRef includes content from more than 3000 publishers and societies. In addition to listing OSA journal articles that cite this paper, citing articles from other participating publishers will also be listed.

« Previous Article  |  Next Article »

OSA is a member of CrossRef.

CrossCheck Deposited