OSA's Digital Library

Journal of the Optical Society of America A

Journal of the Optical Society of America A

| OPTICS, IMAGE SCIENCE, AND VISION

  • Vol. 19, Iss. 5 — May. 1, 2002
  • pp: 833–839

Monochromatic aberrations provide an odd-error cue to focus direction

Brent J. Wilson, Keith E. Decker, and Austin Roorda  »View Author Affiliations


JOSA A, Vol. 19, Issue 5, pp. 833-839 (2002)
http://dx.doi.org/10.1364/JOSAA.19.000833


View Full Text Article

Acrobat PDF (352 KB)





Browse Journals / Lookup Meetings

Browse by Journal and Year


   


Lookup Conference Papers

Close Browse Journals / Lookup Meetings

Article Tools

Share
Citations

Abstract

Monochromatic aberrations that exist in the human eye will cause differences in the appearance of the point-spread function (PSF) depending on whether there is positive or negative defocus. We establish whether it is possible to use these differences in the PSF to distinguish the direction of defocus. The monochromatic aberrations of eight subjects were measured with a Hartmann–Shack wave-front sensor. Subjects also performed a forced-choice psychophysical task in which they decided whether a blurred target was defocused in front of or behind the retina. The optical system for the psychophysical task was designed to isolate the blur due to monochromatic aberrations as the only odd-error cue to the direction of defocus. Shack–Hartmann measurements showed that monochromatic aberrations increase as the pupil size increases. On average, the correct/incorrect responses for discriminating differences in the PSF for different directions of defocus were 54/46 for a 1-mm pupil and 83/17 for a 5-mm pupil, representing more than an eight-fold increase in discriminability. This discriminability extended for large amounts of defocus and also for more complex targets, such as letters. Sensitivity to the differences in the PSF for different directions of defocus increased as monochromatic aberrations increased, particularly for the even-order aberrations, which give rise to an odd-error focus cue. It was found that the ability to discriminate PSFs for different directions of defocus varied among individuals but, in general, depended on the magnitude of monochromatic aberrations.

© 2002 Optical Society of America

OCIS Codes
(330.5370) Vision, color, and visual optics : Physiological optics
(330.5510) Vision, color, and visual optics : Psychophysics

Citation
Brent J. Wilson, Keith E. Decker, and Austin Roorda, "Monochromatic aberrations provide an odd-error cue to focus direction," J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 19, 833-839 (2002)
http://www.opticsinfobase.org/josaa/abstract.cfm?URI=josaa-19-5-833


Sort:  Author  |  Year  |  Journal  |  Reset

References

  1. H. Helmholtz, Helmholtz’s Treatise on Physiological Optics, J. P. C. Southall, ed. (Optical Society of America, Rochester, N.Y., 1924).
  2. T. Young, “On the mechanism of the eye,” Philos. Trans. R. Soc. London 91, 23–88 (1801).
  3. M. Tscherning, Physiologic Optics, C. Weiland, ed., 4th ed. (Keystone, Philadelphia, Pa., 1924).
  4. J. Liang, B. Grimm, S. Goelz, and J. F. Bille, “Objective measurement of wave aberrations of the human eye with use of a Hartmann–Shack wave-front sensor,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 11, 1949–1957 (1994).
  5. R. A. Applegate and P. Artal, eds., feature topic, “Measurement and Correction of the Optical Aberrations of the Human eye,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 15, 2445–2596 (1998).
  6. R. Navarro and M. A. Losada, “On the true shape of the optical point spread function in the human eye,” in Vision Science and Its Applications, Vol. 1 of 1995 OSA Technical Digest Series (Optical Society of America, Washington, D.C., 1995), pp. 66–69.
  7. E. F. Fincham, “The accommodation reflex and its stimulus,” Br. J. Ophthamol. 35, 381–393 (1951).
  8. F. W. Campbell and G. Westheimer, “Factors influencing accommodation responses of the human eye,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. 49, 568–571 (1959).
  9. P. B. Kruger and J. Pola, “Stimuli for accommodation: blur, chromatic aberration and size,” Vision Res. 26, 957–971 (1986).
  10. P. B. Kruger, S. Mathews, M. Katz, K. R. Aggarwala, and S. Nowbotsing, “Accommodation without feedback suggests directional signals specify ocular focus,” Vision Res. 37, 2511–2526 (1997).
  11. F. Schaeffel, A. Glasser, and H. C. Howland, “Accommodation, refractive error and eye growth in chickens,” Vision Res. 28, 639–657 (1988).
  12. C. F. Wildsoet, H. C. Howland, S. Falconer, and K. Dick, “Chromatic aberration and accommodation: their role in emmetropization in the chick,” Vision Res. 33, 1593–1603 (1993).
  13. F. Schaeffel, D. Troilo, J. Wallman, and H. C. Howland, “Developing eyes that lack accommodation grow to compensate for imposed defocus,” Visual Neurosci. 4, 177–183 (1990).
  14. T. Park, J. A. Winawer, and J. Wallman, “In a matter of minutes the eye can know which way to grow,” Invest. Ophthalmol. Visual Sci. Suppl. 42, 55 (2001).
  15. H. C. Howland and B. Howland, “A subjective method for the measurement of monochromatic aberrations of the eye,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. 67, 1508–1518 (1977).
  16. W. N. Charman and J. Tucker, “Accommodation and color,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. 68, 459–471 (1978).
  17. G. Walsh and W. N. Charman, “The effect of defocus on the contrast and phase of the retinal image of a sinusoidal grating,” Ophthalmic Physiol. Opt. 9, 398–404 (1989).
  18. J. Liang and D. R. Williams, “Aberrations and retinal image quality of the normal human eye,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 14, 2873–2883 (1997).
  19. W. J. Smith, Modern Optical Engineering, 2nd ed. (McGraw-Hill, New York, 1990).
  20. F. Wilkinson, H. R. Wilson, and C. Habak, “Detection and recognition of radial frequency patterns,” Vision Res. 38, 3555–3568 (1998).
  21. M. C. W. Campbell, D. Priest, and J. J. Hunter, “The importance of monochromatic aberrations to detecting defocus in retina images,” Invest. Ophthalmol. Visual Sci. Suppl. 42, 98 (2001).

Cited By

Alert me when this paper is cited

OSA is able to provide readers links to articles that cite this paper by participating in CrossRef's Cited-By Linking service. CrossRef includes content from more than 3000 publishers and societies. In addition to listing OSA journal articles that cite this paper, citing articles from other participating publishers will also be listed.


« Previous Article  |  Next Article »

OSA is a member of CrossRef.

CrossCheck Deposited