OSA's Digital Library

Journal of the Optical Society of America A

Journal of the Optical Society of America A

| OPTICS, IMAGE SCIENCE, AND VISION

  • Vol. 19, Iss. 5 — May. 1, 2002
  • pp: 912–925

Analysis of modes and behavior of a multiconjugate adaptive optics system

Miska Le Louarn and Michel Tallon  »View Author Affiliations


JOSA A, Vol. 19, Issue 5, pp. 912-925 (2002)
http://dx.doi.org/10.1364/JOSAA.19.000912


View Full Text Article

Enhanced HTML    Acrobat PDF (646 KB)





Browse Journals / Lookup Meetings

Browse by Journal and Year


   


Lookup Conference Papers

Close Browse Journals / Lookup Meetings

Article Tools

Share
Citations

Abstract

We study the so-called three-dimensional mapping of turbulence, a method solving the cone effect (or focus anisoplanatism) by using multiple laser guide stars (LGSs). This method also permits a widening of the corrected field of view much beyond the isoplanatic field. Multiple deformable mirrors, conjugated to planes at chosen altitudes among the turbulent layers, are used to correct in real time the wave fronts measured from the LGSs. We construct an interaction matrix describing the multiconjugate adaptive optics system and analyze the eigenmodes of the system. We show that the global tilt mode is singular because it cannot be localized in altitude, so that it must be corrected only once at any altitude. Furthermore, when the tilt from the LGS cannot be measured, the singularity of the global tilt yields the delocalization of particular forms of defocus and astigmatism. This imposes the use of a single natural guide star located anywhere in the corrected field to measure these modes. We show as an example that the cone effect can be corrected with a Strehl of 0.8 with four LGSs (tilt ignored) on an 8-m telescope in the visible when a single laser star provides a Strehl of 0.1. The maximum field of view of 100 arc sec in diameter can be reconstructed with an on-axis Strehl ratio of 30%. We also show that the measurement of the height of the layers can be done with current techniques and that additional layers, not accounted for, do not significantly degrade the performance in the configuration that we model.

© 2002 Optical Society of America

OCIS Codes
(010.1080) Atmospheric and oceanic optics : Active or adaptive optics
(010.1330) Atmospheric and oceanic optics : Atmospheric turbulence
(010.7060) Atmospheric and oceanic optics : Turbulence
(010.7350) Atmospheric and oceanic optics : Wave-front sensing

History
Original Manuscript: April 6, 2001
Revised Manuscript: August 3, 2001
Manuscript Accepted: September 27, 2001
Published: May 1, 2002

Citation
Miska Le Louarn and Michel Tallon, "Analysis of modes and behavior of a multiconjugate adaptive optics system," J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 19, 912-925 (2002)
http://www.opticsinfobase.org/josaa/abstract.cfm?URI=josaa-19-5-912


Sort:  Author  |  Year  |  Journal  |  Reset  

References

  1. H. W. Babcock, “The possibility of compensating astronomical seeing,” Publ. Astron. Soc. Pac. 65, 229–236 (1953). [CrossRef]
  2. J.-L. Beuzit, N. Hubin, E. Gendron, L. Demailly, P. Gigan, F. Lacombe, F. Chazalet, D. Rabaud, G. Rousset, “Adonis: a user-friendly adaptive optics system for the ESO 3.6 m telescope,” in Adaptive Optics in Astronomy, M. A. Ealey, F. Merkle, eds., Proc. SPIE2201, 955–960 (1994). [CrossRef]
  3. F. Rigaut, D. Salmon, R. Arsenault, J. Thomas, O. Lai, D. Rouan, J. P. Véran, P. Gigan, D. Crampton, J. M. Fletcher, J. Stilburn, C. Boyer, P. Jagourel, “Performance of the Canada–France–Hawaii Telescope adaptive optics bonnette,” Publ. Astron. Soc. Pac. 110, 152–164 (1998). [CrossRef]
  4. D. L. Fried, “Anisoplanatism in adaptive optics,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. 72, 52–61 (1982). [CrossRef]
  5. F. Rigaut, E. Gendron, “Laser guide star in adaptive optics: the tilt determination problem,” Astron. Astrophys. 261, 677–684 (1992).
  6. M. Le Louarn, R. Foy, N. Hubin, M. Tallon, “Laser guide star for 3.6m and 8m telescopes: performance and astrophysical implications,” Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 295, 756 (1998). [CrossRef]
  7. R. Foy, A. Labeyrie, “Feasibility of adaptive optics telescope with laser probe,” Astron. Astrophys. 152, L29–L31 (1985).
  8. J. D. H. Pilkington, “Artificial guide stars for adaptive imaging,” Nature (London) 330, 116 (1987). [CrossRef]
  9. R. Foy, A. Migus, F. Biraben, G. Grynberg, P. R. McCullough, M. Tallon, “The polychromatic artificial sodium star: a new concept for correcting the atmospheric tilt,” Astron. Astrophys. Suppl. Ser. 111, 569–578 (1995).
  10. R. Ragazzoni, “Robust tilt determination from laser guide star using a combination of different techniques,” Astron. Astrophys. 319, L9–L12 (1997).
  11. D. L. Fried, J. F. Belsher, “Analysis of fundamental limits to artificial guide star adaptive optics systems performance for astronomical imaging,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 11, 277–287 (1994). [CrossRef]
  12. C. E. Max, S. S. Olivier, H. W. Friedman, J. An, K. Avicola, B. V. Beeman, H. D. Bissinger, J. M. Brase, G. V. Erbert, D. T. Gavel, K. Kanz, B. Macintosh, K. P. Neeb, K. E. Waltjen, M. C. Liu, J. Patience, “Image improvement from sodium layer laser guide star adaptive optics system,” Science 277, 1649–1652 (1997). [CrossRef]
  13. R. I. Davies, W. Hackenberg, T. Ott, A. Eckart, H.-C. Holstenberg, S. Rabien, A. Quirrenbach, M. Kasper, “Alfa: first operational experience of the MPE/MPIA laser guide star system for adaptive optics,” in Adaptive Optical System Technologies, D. Bonaccini, R. K. Tyson, eds., Proc. SPIE3353, 116–124 (1998). [CrossRef]
  14. R. Foy, “Laser Guide Star advanced concepts: the cone effect,” in Laser Guide Star Adaptive Optics for Astronomy, (Kluwer Academic, Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 1999), pp. 25–57.
  15. J. M. Beckers, “Increasing the size of the isoplanatic patch with multiconjugate adaptive optics,” in ESO Conference on Very Large Telescopes and Their Instrumentation, M.-H. Ulrich, ed. (European Southern Observatory, Garching bei Muenchen, Germany, 1988), Vol. 2, pp. 693–703.
  16. D. C. Johnston, B. M. Welsh, “Analysis of multiconjugate adaptive optics,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 11, 394–408 (1994). [CrossRef]
  17. B. L. Ellerbroek, “First order performance evaluation of adaptive optics systems for atmospheric turbulence compensation in extended field of view astronomical telescopes,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 11, 783–805 (1994). [CrossRef]
  18. F. Roddier, “The effects of atmospheric turbulence in optical astronomy,” in E. Wolf, editor, Progress in Optics XIX, E. Wolf, ed. (North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1981), pp. 281–376.
  19. A. T. Young, “Aperture filtering and saturation of scintillation,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. 60, 248–250 (1970). [CrossRef]
  20. M. Tallon, R. Foy, “Adaptive telescope with laser probe—isoplanatism and cone effect,” Astron. Astrophys. 235, 549–557 (1990).
  21. B. L. Ellerbroek, F. J. Rigaut, “Scaling multiconjugate adaptive optics performance estimates to extremely large telescopes,” in Adaptive Optical Systems Technology, P. L. Wizinowich, ed., Proc. SPIE4007, 1088–1099 (2000). [CrossRef]
  22. M. Tallon, R. Foy, J. Vernin, “3-D wavefront sensing and multiconjugate adaptive optics,” in Progress in Telescope and Instrumentation Technologies, M.-H. Ulrich, ed. (European Southern Observatory, Garching bei Muenchen, Germany, 1992), pp. 517–521.
  23. F. Roddier, ed., Adaptive Optics in Astronomy (Cambridge U. Press, Cambridge, UK, 1999).
  24. C. Boyer, V. Michau, G. Rousset, “Adaptive optics: interaction matrix measurements and real time control algorithms for the come-on project,” in Amplitude and Intensity Spatial Interferometry, J. B. Breckinridge, ed., Proc. SPIE1237, 406–421 (1990). [CrossRef]
  25. B. L. Ellerbroek, F. Rigaut, “Methods for correcting tilt anisoplanatism in laser-guide-star-based multi-conjugate adaptive optics,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 18, 2539–2547 (2001). [CrossRef]
  26. M. Le Louarn, “Multiconjugate adaptive optics with laser guide stars: performance in the infrared and the visible,” manuscript available from the author.
  27. R. Hudgin, “Wave-front compensation error due to finite corrector-element size,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. 67, 393–395 (1977). [CrossRef]
  28. R. Ragazzoni, E. Marchetti, F. Rigaut, “Modal tomography for adaptive optics,” Astron. Astrophys. 342, L53–L56 (1999).
  29. A. Tokovinin, M. Le Louarn, M. Sarazin, “Isoplanatism in a multiconjugate adaptive optics system,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 17, 1819–1827 (2000). [CrossRef]
  30. W. H. Press, S. A. Teukolsky, W. T. Vetterling, B. P. Flannery, Numerical Recipes in FORTRAN—The Art of Scientific Computing, 2nd ed. (Cambridge U. Press, Cambridge, UK, 1992).
  31. R. J. Sasiela, “Wave-front correction by one or more synthetic beacons,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 11, 379–393 (1994). [CrossRef]
  32. G. A. Tyler, “Merging: a new method for tomography through random media,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 11, 409–424 (1994). [CrossRef]
  33. I. A. De La Rue, B. L. Ellerbroek, “A study of multiple guide stars to improve the performance of laser guide star adaptive optical systems,” in Adaptive Optical System Technologies, D. Bonaccini, R. K. Tyson, eds., Proc. SPIE3353, 310–319 (1998). [CrossRef]
  34. R. R. Parenti, R. J. Sasiela, “Laser guide star systems for astronomical applications,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 11, 288–309 (1994). [CrossRef]
  35. D. G. Sandler, S. Stahl, J. R. P. Angel, M. Lloyd-Hart, D. McCarthy, “Adaptive optics for diffraction-limited infrared imaging with 8-m telescopes,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 11, 925–945 (1994). [CrossRef]
  36. R. G. Lane, A. Glindemann, J. C. Dainty, “Simulation of a Kolmogorov phase screen,” Waves Random Media 2, 209–224 (1992). [CrossRef]
  37. G. Wahba, J. Wendelberger, “Some new mathematical methods for variational objective analysis using splines and cross validation,” Mon. Weather Rev. 108, 1122–1143 (1979). [CrossRef]
  38. G. A. Tyler, “Rapid evaluation of d0: the effective diameter of a laser-guide-star adaptive-optics system,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 11, 325–338 (1994). [CrossRef]
  39. V. A. Klückers, N. J. Wooder, T. W. Nicholls, M. J. Adcock, I. Munro, J. C. Dainty, “Profiling of atmospheric turbulence strength and velocity using a generalised SCIDAR technique,” Astron. Astrophys. Suppl. Ser. 130, 141–155 (1998). [CrossRef]
  40. T. Fusco, J.-M. Conan, V. Michau, L. M. Mugnier, G. Rousset, “Phase estimation for large field of view: application to multiconjugate adaptive optics,” in Propagation and Imaging through the Atmosphere III, M. C. Roggemann, L. R. Bissonnette, eds., Proc. SPIE3763, 125–133 (1999). [CrossRef]
  41. M. Le Louarn, N. Hubin, M. Sarazin, A. Tokovinin, “New challenges for adaptive optics: extremely large telescopes,” Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 317, 535–544 (2000). [CrossRef]
  42. W. H. Southwell, “Wave-front estimation from wave-front slope measurements,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. 70, 998–1006 (1980). [CrossRef]
  43. T. Fusco, “Correction partielle et anisoplanétisme en optique adaptative: traitement a posteriori et optique adaptative multiconjuguée,” Ph.D. thesis (Université de Nice Sophia-Antipolis, Nice, France, 2000).

Cited By

Alert me when this paper is cited

OSA is able to provide readers links to articles that cite this paper by participating in CrossRef's Cited-By Linking service. CrossRef includes content from more than 3000 publishers and societies. In addition to listing OSA journal articles that cite this paper, citing articles from other participating publishers will also be listed.


« Previous Article  |  Next Article »

OSA is a member of CrossRef.

CrossCheck Deposited