OSA's Digital Library

Journal of the Optical Society of America A

Journal of the Optical Society of America A


  • Editor: Franco Gori
  • Vol. 27, Iss. 1 — Jan. 1, 2010
  • pp: 6–12

Analyzing halftone dot blurring by extended spectral prediction models

Mathieu Hébert and Roger David Hersch  »View Author Affiliations

JOSA A, Vol. 27, Issue 1, pp. 6-12 (2010)

View Full Text Article

Enhanced HTML    Acrobat PDF (416 KB)

Browse Journals / Lookup Meetings

Browse by Journal and Year


Lookup Conference Papers

Close Browse Journals / Lookup Meetings

Article Tools



Spectral prediction models for halftone prints generally assume homogeneously thick and sharply edged ink dots, i.e., bilevel halftones. In real prints, the ink thickness often decreases at the boundaries of the ink dots, thereby forming continuous-level halftones. The present study aims at verifying to what extent the classical Clapper–Yule and Yule–Nielsen models are able to predict the reflectance of single-ink continuous-level halftone prints. First we model the reflectance of continuous-level halftones by developing variable thickness extensions of both the Clapper–Yule and the Yule–Nielsen spectral prediction models. We consider continuous halftones whose thickness profiles are obtained by Gaussian filtering of the bilevel halftone image. Then we predict the reflectance spectra defined by the continuous-level models by fitting the bilevel models’ effective ink surface coverages. Since dot blurring tends to increase the absorption of light by the ink, the effective ink surface coverage is larger than the nominal one, i.e., dot blurring induces its own contribution to dot gain. Dot blurring can also be accurately modeled by an increased n-value of the classical Yule–Nielsen model.

© 2009 Optical Society of America

OCIS Codes
(100.2810) Image processing : Halftone image reproduction
(330.1710) Vision, color, and visual optics : Color, measurement

ToC Category:
Image Processing

Original Manuscript: March 18, 2009
Revised Manuscript: September 10, 2009
Manuscript Accepted: November 5, 2009
Published: December 3, 2009

Mathieu Hébert and Roger David Hersch, "Analyzing halftone dot blurring by extended spectral prediction models," J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 27, 6-12 (2010)

Sort:  Author  |  Year  |  Journal  |  Reset  


  1. A. Murray, “Monochrome reproduction in photoengraving,” J. Franklin Inst. 221, 721-744 (1936). [CrossRef]
  2. J. A. C. Yule and W. J. Nielsen, “The penetration of light into paper and its effect on halftone reproduction,” in Proceedings of TAGA (Technical Association of the Graphic Arts, 1951), Vol. 3, 65-76.
  3. J. A. S. Viggiano, “The color of halftone tints,” in Proceedings of TAGA (Technical Association of the Graphic Arts, 1985), Vol. 37, pp. 647-661.
  4. F. R. Ruckdeschel and O. G. Hauser, “Yule-Nielsen effect in printing: a physical analysis,” Appl. Opt. 17, 3376-3383 (1978). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. J. Arney and S. Yamaguchi, “The physics behind the Yule-Nielsen equation,” in Proceedings of PICS 1999: Image Processing, Image Quality, Image Capture, Systems Conference (Society for Imaging Science and Technology, 1999), pp. 381-385.
  6. A. Lewandowski, M. Ludl, G. Byrne, and G. Dorffner, “Applying the Yule-Nielsen equation with negative n,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 23, 1827-1834 (2006). [CrossRef]
  7. F. R. Clapper and J. A. C. Yule, “The effect of multiple internal reflections on the densities of halftone prints on paper,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. 43, 600-603 (1953). [CrossRef]
  8. D. B. Judd, “Fresnel reflection of diffusely incident light,” J. Res. Natl. Bur. Stand. 29, 329-332 (1942).
  9. M. Hébert and R. D. Hersch, “Classical print reflection models: a radiometric approach,” J. Imaging Sci. Technol. 48, 363-374 (2004).
  10. K. Iino and R. Berns, “Building color management modules using linear optimization. I. Desktop color system,” J. Imaging Sci. Technol. 42, 79-94 (1998).
  11. K. Iino and R. Berns, “Building color management modules using linear optimization. II. Prepress system for offset printing,” J. Imaging Sci. Technol. 42, 99-114 (1998).
  12. R. Balasubramanian, “Optimization of the spectral Neugebauer model for printer characterization,” J. Electron. Imaging 8, 156-166 (1999). [CrossRef]
  13. P. Emmel and R. D. Hersch, “Modeling ink spreading for color prediction,” J. Imaging Sci. Technol. 46, 237-246 (2002).
  14. R. D. Hersch, P. Emmel, F. Collaud, and F. Crété (2005), “Spectral reflection and dot surface prediction models for color halftone prints,” J. Electron. Imaging 14, 33001-12. [CrossRef]
  15. G. Rogers, “Optical dot gain in a halftone print,” J. Imaging Sci. Technol. 41, 643-656 (1997).
  16. G. Rogers, “Optical dot gain: lateral scattering probabilities,” J. Imaging Sci. Technol. 42, 341-345 (1998).
  17. J. S. Arney and M. L. Alber, “A probability description of the Yule-Nielsen effect I,” J. Imaging Sci. Technol. 41, 633-636 (1997).
  18. J. S. Arney and M. L. Alber, “Optical effects of ink spread and penetration on halftones printed by thermal ink jet,” J. Imaging Sci. Technol. 42, 331-334 (1998).
  19. L. Yang, R. Lenz, and B. Kruse, “Light scattering and ink penetration effects on tone reproduction,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 18, 360-366 (2001). [CrossRef]
  20. G. Sharma, “Color fundamentals for digital imaging,” in Digital Color Imaging Handbook, G.Sharma, ed. (CRC Press, 2003), pp. 30-36.

Cited By

Alert me when this paper is cited

OSA is able to provide readers links to articles that cite this paper by participating in CrossRef's Cited-By Linking service. CrossRef includes content from more than 3000 publishers and societies. In addition to listing OSA journal articles that cite this paper, citing articles from other participating publishers will also be listed.

« Previous Article  |  Next Article »

OSA is a member of CrossRef.

CrossCheck Deposited