OSA's Digital Library

Journal of the Optical Society of America A

Journal of the Optical Society of America A

| OPTICS, IMAGE SCIENCE, AND VISION

  • Editor: Franco Gori
  • Vol. 29, Iss. 7 — Jul. 1, 2012
  • pp: 1211–1216

Local-feature-based similarity measure for stochastic resonance in visual perception of spatially structured images

Agnès Delahaies, David Rousseau, Jean-Baptiste Fasquel, and François Chapeau-Blondeau  »View Author Affiliations


JOSA A, Vol. 29, Issue 7, pp. 1211-1216 (2012)
http://dx.doi.org/10.1364/JOSAA.29.001211


View Full Text Article

Enhanced HTML    Acrobat PDF (1127 KB)





Browse Journals / Lookup Meetings

Browse by Journal and Year


   


Lookup Conference Papers

Close Browse Journals / Lookup Meetings

Article Tools

Share
Citations

Abstract

For images, stochastic resonance or useful-noise effects have previously been assessed with low-level pixel-based information measures. Such measures are not sensitive to coherent spatial structures usually existing in images. As a result, we show that such measures are not sufficient to properly account for stochastic resonance occurring in visual perception. We introduce higher-level similarity measures, inspired from visual perception, and based on local feature descriptors of scale invariant feature transform (SIFT) type. We demonstrate that such SIFT-based measures allow for an assessment of stochastic resonance that matches the visual perception of images with spatial structures. Constructive action of noise is registered in this way with both additive noise and multiplicative speckle noise. Speckle noise, with its grainy appearance, is particularly prone to introducing spurious spatial structures in images, and the stochastic resonance visually perceived and quantitatively assessed with SIFT-based measures is specially examined in this context.

© 2012 Optical Society of America

OCIS Codes
(000.2690) General : General physics
(030.4280) Coherence and statistical optics : Noise in imaging systems
(030.6140) Coherence and statistical optics : Speckle
(100.2000) Image processing : Digital image processing
(100.5010) Image processing : Pattern recognition
(120.6150) Instrumentation, measurement, and metrology : Speckle imaging

ToC Category:
Image Processing

History
Original Manuscript: January 10, 2012
Manuscript Accepted: March 21, 2012
Published: June 4, 2012

Virtual Issues
Vol. 7, Iss. 9 Virtual Journal for Biomedical Optics

Citation
Agnès Delahaies, David Rousseau, Jean-Baptiste Fasquel, and François Chapeau-Blondeau, "Local-feature-based similarity measure for stochastic resonance in visual perception of spatially structured images," J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 29, 1211-1216 (2012)
http://www.opticsinfobase.org/josaa/abstract.cfm?URI=josaa-29-7-1211


Sort:  Author  |  Year  |  Journal  |  Reset  

References

  1. M. D. McDonnell, N. G. Stocks, C. E. M. Pearce, and D. Abbott, Stochastic Resonance: From Suprathreshold Stochastic Resonance to Stochastic Signal Quantization (Cambridge University, 2008).
  2. B. M. Jost and B. E. A. Saleh, “Signal-to-noise ratio improvement by stochastic resonance in a unidirectional photorefractive ring resonator,” Opt. Lett. 21, 287–289 (1996). [CrossRef]
  3. F. Vaudelle, J. Gazengel, G. Rivoire, X. Godivier, and F. Chapeau-Blondeau, “Stochastic resonance and noise-enhanced transmission of spatial signals in optics: the case of scattering,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. B 15, 2674–2680 (1998). [CrossRef]
  4. K. P. Singh, G. Ropars, M. Brunel, and A. Le Floch, “Stochastic resonance in an optical two-order parameter vectorial system,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 87, 213901 (2001). [CrossRef]
  5. F. Marino, M. Giudici, S. Barland, and S. Balle, “Experimental evidence of stochastic resonance in an excitable optical system,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 88, 040601 (2002). [CrossRef]
  6. D. V. Dylov and J. W. Fleischer, “Nonlinear self-filtering of noisy images via dynamical stochastic resonance,” Nat. Photon. 4, 323–328 (2010). [CrossRef]
  7. S. Blanchard, D. Rousseau, D. Gindre, and F. Chapeau-Blondeau, “Constructive action of the speckle noise in a coherent imaging system,” Opt. Lett. 32, 1983–1985 (2007). [CrossRef]
  8. F. Chapeau-Blondeau, D. Rousseau, S. Blanchard, and D. Gindre, “Optimizing the speckle noise for maximum efficacy of data acquisition in coherent imaging,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 25, 1287–1292 (2008). [CrossRef]
  9. E. Simonotto, M. Riani, C. Seife, M. Roberts, J. Twitty, and F. Moss, “Visual perception of stochastic resonance,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 78, 1186–1189 (1997). [CrossRef]
  10. D. Rousseau, A. Delahaies, and F. Chapeau-Blondeau, “Structural similarity measure to assess improvement by noise in nonlinear image transmission,” IEEE Signal Process. Lett. 17, 36–39 (2010). [CrossRef]
  11. Z. Wang and A. C. Bovik, “A universal image quality index,” IEEE Signal Process. Lett. 9, 81–84 (2002). [CrossRef]
  12. L. Itti, C. Koch, and E. Niebur, “A model of saliency-based visual attention for rapid scene analysis,” IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Machine Intell. 20, 1254–1259 (1998). [CrossRef]
  13. J. Li and N. M. Allison, “A comprehensive review of current local features for computer vision,” Neurocomputing 71, 1771–1787 (2008). [CrossRef]
  14. D. G. Lowe, “Distinctive image features from scale-invariant keypoints,” Int. J. Comput. Vis. 60, 91–110 (2004). [CrossRef]
  15. http://www.vlfeat.org/∼vedaldi/code/sift.html .
  16. J. W. Goodman, Speckle Phenomena in Optics: Theory and Applications (Roberts & Company, 2006).
  17. F. Moss, L. M. Ward, and W. G. Sannita, “Stochastic resonance and sensory information processing: a tutorial and review of application,” Clin. Neurophysiol. 115, 267–281 (2004). [CrossRef]
  18. A. T. Duchowski, Eye Tracking Methodology: Theory and Practice (Springer, 2007).
  19. A. Delahaies, D. Rousseau, and F. Chapeau-Blondeau, “Joint acquisition-processing approach to optimize observation scales in noisy imaging,” Opt. Lett. 36, 972–974 (2011). [CrossRef]
  20. A. Delahaies, D. Rousseau, D. Gindre, and F. Chapeau-Blondeau, “Exploiting the speckle noise for compressive sensing,” Opt. Commun. 284, 3939–3945 (2011). [CrossRef]
  21. D. Ruderman and W. Bialek, “Statistics of natural images: scaling in the woods,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 73, 814–817 (1994). [CrossRef]
  22. P. Isola, J. Xiao, A. Torralba, and A. Oliva, “What makes an image memorable?” in Proceedings of IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (IEEE, 2011), pp. 145–156.

Cited By

Alert me when this paper is cited

OSA is able to provide readers links to articles that cite this paper by participating in CrossRef's Cited-By Linking service. CrossRef includes content from more than 3000 publishers and societies. In addition to listing OSA journal articles that cite this paper, citing articles from other participating publishers will also be listed.


« Previous Article  |  Next Article »

OSA is a member of CrossRef.

CrossCheck Deposited