OSA's Digital Library

Journal of the Optical Society of America A

Journal of the Optical Society of America A

| OPTICS, IMAGE SCIENCE, AND VISION

  • Editor: Franco Gori
  • Vol. 30, Iss. 5 — May. 1, 2013
  • pp: 923–931

Empirical variability in the calibration of slope-based eccentric photorefraction

Shrikant R. Bharadwaj, N. Geetha Sravani, Julie-Anne Little, Asa Narasaiah, Vivian Wong, Rachel Woodburn, and T. Rowan Candy  »View Author Affiliations


JOSA A, Vol. 30, Issue 5, pp. 923-931 (2013)
http://dx.doi.org/10.1364/JOSAA.30.000923


View Full Text Article

Enhanced HTML    Acrobat PDF (702 KB)





Browse Journals / Lookup Meetings

Browse by Journal and Year


   


Lookup Conference Papers

Close Browse Journals / Lookup Meetings

Article Tools

Share
Citations

Abstract

Refraction estimates from eccentric infrared (IR) photorefraction depend critically on the calibration of luminance slopes in the pupil. While the intersubject variability of this calibration has been estimated, there is no systematic evaluation of its intrasubject variability. This study determined the within subject inter- and intra-session repeatability of this calibration factor and the optimum range of lenses needed to derive this value. Relative calibrations for the MCS PowerRefractor and a customized photorefractor were estimated twice within one session or across two sessions by placing trial lenses before one eye covered with an IR transmitting filter. The data were subsequently resampled with various lens combinations to determine the impact of lens power range on the calibration estimates. Mean ( ± 1.96 SD) calibration slopes were 0.99 ± 0.39 for North Americans with the MCS PowerRefractor (relative to its built-in value) and 0.65 ± 0.25 Ls / D and 0.40 ± 0.09 Ls / D for Indians and North Americans with the custom photorefractor, respectively. The ± 95 % limits of agreement of intrasubject variability ranged from ± 0.39 to ± 0.56 for the MCS PowerRefractor and ± 0.03 Ls / D to ± 0.04 Ls / D for the custom photorefractor. The mean differences within and across sessions were not significantly different from zero ( p > 0.38 for all). The combined intersubject and intrasubject variability of calibration is therefore about ± 40 % of the mean value, implying that significant errors in individual refraction/accommodation estimates may arise if a group-average calibration is used. Protocols containing both plus and minus lenses had calibration slopes closest to the gold-standard protocol, suggesting that they may provide the best estimate of the calibration factor compared to those containing either plus or minus lenses.

© 2013 Optical Society of America

OCIS Codes
(330.4460) Vision, color, and visual optics : Ophthalmic optics and devices
(330.7322) Vision, color, and visual optics : Visual optics, accommodation
(330.7327) Vision, color, and visual optics : Visual optics, ophthalmic instrumentation
(330.7328) Vision, color, and visual optics : Visual optics, ophthalmic appliances

ToC Category:
Vision, Color, and Visual Optics

History
Original Manuscript: October 8, 2012
Revised Manuscript: January 25, 2013
Manuscript Accepted: March 7, 2013
Published: April 19, 2013

Virtual Issues
Vol. 8, Iss. 6 Virtual Journal for Biomedical Optics

Citation
Shrikant R. Bharadwaj, N. Geetha Sravani, Julie-Anne Little, Asa Narasaiah, Vivian Wong, Rachel Woodburn, and T. Rowan Candy, "Empirical variability in the calibration of slope-based eccentric photorefraction," J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 30, 923-931 (2013)
http://www.opticsinfobase.org/josaa/abstract.cfm?URI=josaa-30-5-923

You do not have subscription access to this journal. Citation lists with outbound citation links are available to subscribers only. You may subscribe either as an OSA member, or as an authorized user of your institution.

Contact your librarian or system administrator
or
Log in to access OSA Member Subscription

You do not have subscription access to this journal. Cited by links are available to subscribers only. You may subscribe either as an OSA member, or as an authorized user of your institution.

Contact your librarian or system administrator
or
Log in to access OSA Member Subscription

You do not have subscription access to this journal. Figure files are available to subscribers only. You may subscribe either as an OSA member, or as an authorized user of your institution.

Contact your librarian or system administrator
or
Log in to access OSA Member Subscription

You do not have subscription access to this journal. Article level metrics are available to subscribers only. You may subscribe either as an OSA member, or as an authorized user of your institution.

Contact your librarian or system administrator
or
Log in to access OSA Member Subscription

« Previous Article  |  Next Article »

OSA is a member of CrossRef.

CrossCheck Deposited