OSA's Digital Library

Journal of the Optical Society of America A

Journal of the Optical Society of America A

| OPTICS, IMAGE SCIENCE, AND VISION

  • Editor: Franco Gori
  • Vol. 31, Iss. 1 — Jan. 1, 2014
  • pp: 75–80

Bounding the relative errors associated with a complete Stokes polarimeter

Emanuel Chironi and Claudio Iemmi  »View Author Affiliations


JOSA A, Vol. 31, Issue 1, pp. 75-80 (2014)
http://dx.doi.org/10.1364/JOSAA.31.000075


View Full Text Article

Enhanced HTML    Acrobat PDF (309 KB)





Browse Journals / Lookup Meetings

Browse by Journal and Year


   


Lookup Conference Papers

Close Browse Journals / Lookup Meetings

Article Tools

Share
Citations

Abstract

In this paper, we propose a criterion for bounding the relative errors associated with the determination of the Stokes vector that describes the state of polarization of a light beam. No assumptions about the magnitude, origin, or statistical behavior of the errors are made. It is shown that figures of merit such as the condition number and the equally weighted variance naturally arise as optimization parameters. Moreover, a third optimization parameter emerges, which takes into account errors associated with the matrix that represents the selected configuration of analyzers. Finally, a new and more general figure of merit is derived from this analysis and is applied in an optimization process of a very well known polarimeter.

© 2013 Optical Society of America

OCIS Codes
(100.3190) Image processing : Inverse problems
(120.2130) Instrumentation, measurement, and metrology : Ellipsometry and polarimetry
(120.5410) Instrumentation, measurement, and metrology : Polarimetry
(230.5440) Optical devices : Polarization-selective devices

ToC Category:
Instrumentation, Measurement, and Metrology

History
Original Manuscript: July 19, 2013
Revised Manuscript: November 21, 2013
Manuscript Accepted: November 21, 2013
Published: December 6, 2013

Citation
Emanuel Chironi and Claudio Iemmi, "Bounding the relative errors associated with a complete Stokes polarimeter," J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 31, 75-80 (2014)
http://www.opticsinfobase.org/josaa/abstract.cfm?URI=josaa-31-1-75


Sort:  Author  |  Year  |  Journal  |  Reset  

References

  1. N. Ghosh and I. A. Vitkin, “Tissue polarimetry: concepts, challenges, applications and outlook,” J. Biomed. Opt. 16, 110801 (2011). [CrossRef]
  2. P. Shukla and A. Pradhan, “Mueller decomposition images for cervical tissue: potential for discriminating normal and dysplastic states,” Opt. Express 17, 1600–1609 (2009). [CrossRef]
  3. M. F. G. Wood, N. Ghosh, X. Guo, and I. A. Vitkin, “Towards noninvasive glucose sensing using polarization analysis of multiply scattered light,” in Handbook of Optical Sensing of Glucose in Biological Fluids and Tissues, V. V. Tuchin, ed., Vol. 12 of Series in Medical Physics and Biomedical Engineering (Taylor & Francis, 2008), Chap. 17.
  4. D. Côté and I. A. Vitkin, “Robust concentration determination of optically active molecules in turbid media with validated three-dimensional polarization sensitive Monte Carlo calculations,” Opt. Express 13, 148–163 (2005). [CrossRef]
  5. S. Tan and R. M. Narayanan, “Design and performance of a multiwavelength airborne polarimetric lidar for vegetation remote sensing,” Appl. Opt. 43, 2360–2368 (2004). [CrossRef]
  6. G. Horvath, A. Barta, J. Gal, B. Suhai, and O. Haiman, “Ground-based full-sky imaging polarimetry of rapidly changing skies and its use for polarimetric cloud detection,” Appl. Opt. 41, 543–559 (2002). [CrossRef]
  7. D. S. Sabatke, M. R. Descour, E. L. Dereniak, W. C. Sweatt, S. A. Kemme, and G. S. Phipps, “Optimization of retardance for a complete Stokes polarimeter,” Opt. Lett. 25, 802–804 (2000). [CrossRef]
  8. J. S. Tyo, “Design of optimal polarimeters: maximization of signal-to-noise ratio and minimization of systematic error,” Appl. Opt. 41, 619–630 (2002). [CrossRef]
  9. A. Peinado, A. Lizana, J. Vidal, C. Iemmi, and J. Campos, “Optimization and performance criteria of a Stokes polarimeter based on two variable retarders,” Opt. Express 18, 9815–9830 (2010). [CrossRef]
  10. A. Ben-Israel and T. N. E. Greville, Generalized Inverses: Theory and Applications (Springer, 2003).
  11. A. Peinado, A. Lizana, J. Vidal, C. Iemmi, and J. Campos, “Optimized Stokes polarimeters based on a single twisted nematic liquid-crystal device for the minimization of noise propagation,” Appl. Opt. 50, 5437–5445 (2011). [CrossRef]
  12. J. M. Daniels, “Optimum design of a polarimeter for visible light,” Rev. Sci. Instrum. 57, 1570–1573 (1986). [CrossRef]
  13. K. M. Twietmeyer and R. A. Chipman, “Optimization of Mueller matrix polarimeters in the presence of error sources,” Opt. Express 16, 11589–11603 (2008). [CrossRef]
  14. I. J. Vaughn and B. G. Hoover, “Noise reduction in a laser polarimeter based on discrete waveplate rotations,” Opt. Express 16, 2091–2108 (2008). [CrossRef]
  15. D. Layden, M. F. G. Wood, and I. A. Vitkin, “Optimum selection of input polarization states in determining the sample Mueller matrix: a dual photoelastic polarimeter approach,” Opt. Express 20, 20466–20481 (2012). [CrossRef]
  16. T. M. Apostol, Calculus, Volume II: Multi-Variable Calculus and Linear Algebra, with Applications to Differential Equations and Probability (Wiley, 1967).
  17. G. H. Golub and C. F. Van Loan, Matrix Computations (Johns Hopkins University, 1996).
  18. J. T. Schwartz, Introduction to Matrices and Vectors (Dover, 2001).

Cited By

Alert me when this paper is cited

OSA is able to provide readers links to articles that cite this paper by participating in CrossRef's Cited-By Linking service. CrossRef includes content from more than 3000 publishers and societies. In addition to listing OSA journal articles that cite this paper, citing articles from other participating publishers will also be listed.

Figures

Fig. 1. Fig. 2.
 

« Previous Article  |  Next Article »

OSA is a member of CrossRef.

CrossCheck Deposited