OSA's Digital Library

Journal of the Optical Society of America A

Journal of the Optical Society of America A

| OPTICS, IMAGE SCIENCE, AND VISION

  • Vol. 9, Iss. 1 — Jan. 1, 1992
  • pp: 154–166

Experimental test of an analytical model of aberration in an oil-immersion objective lens used in three-dimensional light microscopy

Sarah Frisken Gibson and Frederick Lanni  »View Author Affiliations


JOSA A, Vol. 9, Issue 1, pp. 154-166 (1992)
http://dx.doi.org/10.1364/JOSAA.9.000154


View Full Text Article

Enhanced HTML    Acrobat PDF (3911 KB)





Browse Journals / Lookup Meetings

Browse by Journal and Year


   


Lookup Conference Papers

Close Browse Journals / Lookup Meetings

Article Tools

Share
Citations

Abstract

Oil-immersion microscope objective lenses have been designed and optimized for the study of thin, two-dimensional object sections that are mounted immediately below the coverslip in a medium that is index matched to the immersion oil. It has been demonstrated both experimentally and through geometrical- and physical-optics theory that, when the microscope is not used with the correct coverslip or immersion oil, when the detector is not located at the optimal plane in image space, or when the object does not satisfy specific conditions, aberration will degrade both the contrast and the resolution of the image. In biology the most severe aberration is introduced when an oil-immersion objective lens is used to study thick specimens, such as living cells and tissues, whose refractive indices are significantly different from that of the immersion oil. We present a model of the three-dimensional imaging properties of a fluorescence light microscope subject to such aberration and compare the imaging properties predicted by the model with those measured experimentally. The model can be used to understand and compensate for aberration introduced to a microscope system under nondesign optical conditions so that both confocal laser scanning microscopy and optical serial sectioning microscopy can be optimized.

© 1992 Optical Society of America

History
Original Manuscript: July 11, 1990
Revised Manuscript: April 8, 1991
Manuscript Accepted: April 9, 1991
Published: January 1, 1992

Citation
Sarah Frisken Gibson and Frederick Lanni, "Experimental test of an analytical model of aberration in an oil-immersion objective lens used in three-dimensional light microscopy," J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 9, 154-166 (1992)
http://www.opticsinfobase.org/josaa/abstract.cfm?URI=josaa-9-1-154


Sort:  Author  |  Year  |  Journal  |  Reset  

References

  1. S. Inoue, Video Microscopy (Plenum, New York, 1986).
  2. B. Herman, K. Jacobson, eds., Optical Microscopy for Biology (Wiley, New York, 1990).
  3. Y. Wang, D. L. Taylor, eds., Methods in Cell Biology, Fluorescence Microscopy of Living Cells in Culture (Academic, San Diego, Calif., 1989), Vol. 30, Part B.
  4. G. Brakenhoff, H. T. van der Voort, E. A. van Spronson, N. Nanninga, “3-dimensional imaging of biological structures by high resolution confocal scanning laser microscopy,” Scanning Microsc. 2, 33–40 (1988). [PubMed]
  5. T. Wilson, C. Sheppard, Theory and Practice of Scanning Optical Microscopy (Academic, New York, 1984).
  6. D. Agard, “Optical sectioning microscopy: cellular architecture in three dimensions,” Annu. Rev. Biophys. Bioeng. 13, 191–219 (1984). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. S. Frisken Gibson, F. Lanni, “Measured and analytical point-spread functions of the optical microscope for use in 3-D optical serial sectioning microscopy,” in Optical Microscopy for Biology, B. Herman, K. Jacobson, eds. (Wiley, New York, 1990), pp. 109–118.
  8. M. Born, E. Wolf, Principles of Optics, 8th ed. (Pergamon, New York, 1959).
  9. H. H. Hopkins, “The frequency response of a defocused optical system,” Proc. Phys. Soc. London Sect. A 231, 91–103 (1955). [CrossRef]
  10. P. A. Stokseth, “Properties of a defocused optical system,”J. Opt. Soc. Am. 59, 1314–1321 (1969). [CrossRef]
  11. F. S. Fay, W. Carrington, W. Fogarty, “Three-dimensional molecular distribution in single cells analyzed using the digital imaging microscope,” J. Microsc. (Oxford) Part 2 153, 133–149 (1989). [CrossRef]
  12. L. Tella, “The determination of a microscope’s three-dimensional transfer function for the use in image restoration,” master’s thesis (Worcester Polytechnic Institute, Worcester, Mass., 1985).
  13. D. Agard, Y. Hiraoka, P. Shaw, J. Sedat, “Fluorescence microscopy in three dimensions,” in Methods in Cell Biology, Fluorescence Microscopy of Living Cells in Culture, D. L. Taylor, Y. Wang, eds. (Academic, San Diego, Calif., 1989), Vol. 30, Part B, Chap. 13, pp. 353–377.
  14. Y. Hiraoka, J. W. Sedat, D. Agard, “Determination of the three-dimensional imaging properties of a light microscope system: partial confocal behavior in epifluorescence microscopy,” Biophys. J. 57, 325–333 (1990). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. The accuracy of this assumption can easily be verified for a microscope lens system by the use of a planar diffraction grating object illuminated by a monochromatic, collimated laser and a telescope used to observe the back focal surface. We made these measurements on the microscope objective lenses described in this paper and found that the lenses produced compact images over the back focal surface of the individual diffraction orders formed by the grating and that this surface was planar to ±100 μm across the diameter of the back focal surface. The compact image of each order had the appearance of an Airy pattern, from which we conclude that each is a nearly stigmatic image of the incoming parallel rays. We also verified that the diffraction orders were equispaced in the focal plane, as is expected for a lens that obeys the sine condition. The results of this experiment verify the assumption that parallel rays entering a lens system will travel equal optical paths and cross in the back focal plane as well as the assumption that the back focal surface is planar.
  16. S. Frisken Gibson, “Modeling the 3-D imaging properties of the fluorescence light microscope,” Ph.D. dissertation (Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, Pa., 1990).
  17. R. J. Bracey, “I. The aberrations of microscope objectives and their variations with small departures from optimum working conditions,”J. R. Microsc. Soc. 72, 1–9 (1952). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. B. Spinnel, R. Loveland, “V. Optics of the object space in microscopy,”J. R. Microsc. Soc. 79, 59–80 (1960). [CrossRef]
  19. R. Loveland, Photomicrography: A Comprehensive Treatise (Wiley, New York, 1981).
  20. H. Kraus, “Huygens–Fresnel–Kirchhoff wave-front diffraction formulation: spherical waves,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 6, 1196–1205 (1989). [CrossRef]
  21. B. Richards, E. Wolf, “Electromagnetic diffraction in optical systems II. Structure in the image field of an aplanatic system,” Proc. R. Soc. London 253, 358–379 (1959). [CrossRef]
  22. H. van der Voort, G. Brakenhoff, “3D image formation in high-aperture fluorescence confocal microscopy: a numerical analysis,” J. Microsc. (Oxford) Part 2 158, 43–54 (1990). [CrossRef]
  23. Y. Hiraoka, J. W. Sedat, D. Agard, “The use of a charge-coupled device for quantitative optical microscopy of biological structures,” Science 238, 36–41 (1987). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Rayleigh’s quarter-wave rule states that the quality of the (2-D) image is not seriously affected when the wave-front error in the back aperture of the objective lens is less than 1/4 wavelength.8 However, Bracey17 states that this tolerance may be slightly high for the experienced microscopist and hence both λ/4 and λ/8 have been used as estimates of the maximum tolerable aberration.
  25. R. Barakat, “Computation of the transfer function of an optical system from the design data for rotationally symmetric aberrations,”J. Opt. Soc. Am. 52, 985–997 (1962). [CrossRef]
  26. R. Barakat, D. Lev, “Transfer function and total illuminance of high NA systems obeying the sine condition,”J. Opt. Soc. Am. 53, 324–332 (1963). [CrossRef]
  27. B. Nijboer, “The diffraction theory of optical aberration. Part II. Diffraction in the presence of small aberrations,” Physica 13, 605–620 (1943). [CrossRef]
  28. S. Wang, B. Frieden, “Effects of third order spherical aberration on the diffraction-limited 3-D incoherent optical transfer function,” Appl. Opt. 29, 2424–2432 (1990). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

Cited By

Alert me when this paper is cited

OSA is able to provide readers links to articles that cite this paper by participating in CrossRef's Cited-By Linking service. CrossRef includes content from more than 3000 publishers and societies. In addition to listing OSA journal articles that cite this paper, citing articles from other participating publishers will also be listed.


« Previous Article  |  Next Article »

OSA is a member of CrossRef.

CrossCheck Deposited