OSA's Digital Library

Journal of the Optical Society of America A

Journal of the Optical Society of America A


  • Vol. 10, Iss. 3 — Mar. 1, 1993
  • pp: 395–404

Simultaneous discrimination of the spatial frequency and contrast of periodic stimuli

Mark W. Greenlee and James P. Thomas  »View Author Affiliations

JOSA A, Vol. 10, Issue 3, pp. 395-404 (1993)

View Full Text Article

Enhanced HTML    Acrobat PDF (1106 KB)

Browse Journals / Lookup Meetings

Browse by Journal and Year


Lookup Conference Papers

Close Browse Journals / Lookup Meetings

Article Tools



Discrimination thresholds for spatial frequency and contrast were measured as a function of (1) the spatial-frequency bandwidth of the stimuli, (2) the reference contrast of the stimuli, and (3) whether the observer knew on which dimension, spatial frequency or contrast, the stimuli would differ. Relative bandwidth was manipulated by a one-dimensional Gaussian window and varied from 0.25 to 2.0 octaves. The results of two different tasks were compared. In a single-judgment task the observer knew on which dimension the stimuli would differ, and discrimination thresholds were measured in a standard two-interval forced-choice staircase procedure. In a dual-judgment task the dimension on which the stimuli differed varied from trial to trial. In this task the observer made two judgments on each trial in a modified two-interval forced-choice procedure: (1) on which dimension the stimuli differed and (2) in which interval the stimulus with the higher spatial frequency or contrast appeared. Thresholds were measured by five interleaved staircases for five reference contrast levels that varied from 0.02 to 0.32. Thresholds for both spatial frequency and contrast increased with increasing stimulus bandwidth and decreased with increasing stimulus contrast. Thresholds were, on average, 1.8 times higher in the dual-judgment task than in the single-judgment task, independent of the stimulus contrast and the bandwidth. A stimulus-uncertainty model is described that accounts for the difference between thresholds in the single- and the dual-judgment tasks.

© 1993 Optical Society of America

Original Manuscript: November 22, 1991
Revised Manuscript: October 14, 1992
Manuscript Accepted: August 26, 1992
Published: March 1, 1993

Mark W. Greenlee and James P. Thomas, "Simultaneous discrimination of the spatial frequency and contrast of periodic stimuli," J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 10, 395-404 (1993)

Sort:  Author  |  Year  |  Journal  |  Reset  


  1. F. W. Campbell, J. Nachmias, J. Jukes, “Spatial frequency discrimination in human vision,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. 60, 555–559 (1970). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. J. Hirsch, R. Hylton, “Limits of spatial frequency discrimination as evidence of neural interpolation,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. 72, 1367–1374 (1982). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. M. J. Mayer, C. B. Y. Kim, “Smooth frequency discrimination functions for foveal, high-contrast, mid spatial frequencies,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 3, 1957–1969 (1986). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. T. Cohn, E. D. J. Lasley, “Detectability of a luminance increment: effect of spatial uncertainty,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. 64, 1715–1719 (1974). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. E. T. Davis, P. Kramer, N. Graham, “Uncertainty about spatial frequency, spatial position, or contrast of visual patterns,” Percept. Psychophys. 33, 20–28 (1983). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. E. T. Davis, N. Graham, “Spatial frequency uncertainty effects in the detection of sinusoidal gratings,” Vis. Res. 21, 705–712 (1981). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. N. Graham, J. Nachmias, “Detection of grating patterns containing two spatial frequencies: a comparison of single-channel and multiple-channel models,” Vis. Res. 11, 251–259 (1971). [CrossRef]
  8. N. Graham, J. G. Robson, J. Nachmias, “Grating summation in fovea and periphery,” Vis. Res. 18, 815–826 (1978). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. N. Graham, Visual Pattern Analyzers (Oxford U. Press, New York, 1989). [CrossRef]
  10. G. Sperling, B. A. Dosher, “Strategy and optimization in human information processing,” in Handbook of Perception and Human Performance, K. R. Boff, L. Kaufman, J. P. Thomas, eds. (Wiley, New York, 1986).
  11. E. Howard, Perception of Sinusoidal Gratings as a Function of Gaussian Truncation (U. California Press, Los Angeles, Calif., 1989).
  12. M. W. Greenlee, “Spatial frequency discrimination of band-limited periodic targets: effects of stimulus contrast, bandwidth and retinal eccentricity,” Vis. Res. 32, 275–283 (1992). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. C. S. Furchner, J. P. Thomas, F. W. Campbell, “Detection and discrimination of simple and complex patterns at low spatial frequencies,” Vis. Res. 17, 827–836 (1977). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. A. B. Watson, J. G. Robson, “Discrimination at threshold: labelled detectors in human vision,” Vis. Res. 21, 1115–1122 (1981). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. J. P. Thomas, “Underlying psychometric functions for detecting gratings and identifying spatial frequency,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. 73, 751–758 (1983). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. S. Marcelja, “Mathematical description of the responses of simple cortical cells,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. 70, 1297–1300 (1980). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. H. Lieberman, A. P. Pentland, “Microcomputer-based estimation of psychophysical thresholds: the best PEST,” Behav. Res. Methods Instrum. Computers 14, 21–25 (1982). [CrossRef]
  18. B. Gouled Smith, J. P. Thomas, “Why are some spatial discriminations independent of contrast?” J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 6, 713–724 (1989). [CrossRef]
  19. D. G. Pelli, “Uncertainty effects explain many aspects of visual contrast detection and discrimination,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 2, 1508–1531 (1985). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. W. P. Tanner, “Theory of recognition,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 28, 882–888 (1956). [CrossRef]
  21. J. P. Thomas, J. Gille, R. A. Barker, “Simultaneous visual detection and identification,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. 72, 1642–1651 (1982). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. J. P. Thomas, L. A. Olzak, “Simultaneous detection and identification,” in Multidimensional Models of Perception and Cognition, F. G. Ashby, ed. (Erlbaum, Hillsdale, N.J., to be published).
  23. The error distribution was tested with the χ2 statistic(2)χ2=∑i=1n((fobserved−fexpected)2fexpected),with df = 1, when we compared errors made with respect to the interval to those made with respect to the dimension (summed over correct and incorrect interval judgments). In its more general form the χ2 statistic can be used to test the frequency distribution in an n × m contingency table,(3)c2=∑i=1n∑j=1m((fobserved−fexpected)2fexpected),where fexpected = NiXj/N and df = (n − 1)(m − 1). This more general form of the χ2 statistic was used to test the effects of stimulus contrast and bandwidth on the error distributions.
  24. S. A. Klein, “Double-judgment psychophysics: problems and solutions,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 2, 1560–1585 (1985). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. J. P. Thomas, L. A. Olzak, “Cue summation in spatial discriminations,” Vis. Res. 30, 1865–1875 (1990). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

Cited By

Alert me when this paper is cited

OSA is able to provide readers links to articles that cite this paper by participating in CrossRef's Cited-By Linking service. CrossRef includes content from more than 3000 publishers and societies. In addition to listing OSA journal articles that cite this paper, citing articles from other participating publishers will also be listed.

Next Article »

OSA is a member of CrossRef.

CrossCheck Deposited