OSA's Digital Library

Journal of the Optical Society of America A

Journal of the Optical Society of America A

| OPTICS, IMAGE SCIENCE, AND VISION

  • Vol. 10, Iss. 8 — Aug. 1, 1993
  • pp: 1841–1848

Binocular enhancement of visual acuity

Ron Cagenello, Aries Arditi, and D. Lynn Halpern  »View Author Affiliations


JOSA A, Vol. 10, Issue 8, pp. 1841-1848 (1993)
http://dx.doi.org/10.1364/JOSAA.10.001841


View Full Text Article

Enhanced HTML    Acrobat PDF (1133 KB)





Browse Journals / Lookup Meetings

Browse by Journal and Year


   


Lookup Conference Papers

Close Browse Journals / Lookup Meetings

Article Tools

Share
Citations

Abstract

Using a computerized test system, we compared binocular and monocular visual optotype acuity, varying both contrast and contrast disparity between the two eyes. When contrast was the same in the two eyes, binocular acuity was better than best monocular acuity by an average of 0.045 log minimum angle of resolution, or 11%. When contrast differed in the two eyes, binocular acuity in most but not all cases was still better than the monocular acuity of the eye that received the higher contrast. This binocular advantage became smaller but remained significant as contrast disparity became larger. These results are most simply explained by threshold contrast summation of high-spatial-frequency letter components.

© 1993 Optical Society of America

History
Original Manuscript: July 10, 1992
Revised Manuscript: October 26, 1992
Manuscript Accepted: December 9, 1992
Published: August 1, 1993

Citation
Ron Cagenello, D. Lynn Halpern, and Aries Arditi, "Binocular enhancement of visual acuity," J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 10, 1841-1848 (1993)
http://www.opticsinfobase.org/josaa/abstract.cfm?URI=josaa-10-8-1841


Sort:  Author  |  Year  |  Journal  |  Reset  

References

  1. F. W. Campbell, D. G. Green, “Monocular versus binocular visual acuity,” Nature (London) 208, 191–192 (1965). [CrossRef]
  2. J. H. Bacon, “The interaction of dichoptically presented spatial gratings,” Vision Res. 16, 337–344 (1976). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. R. Blake, E. Levinson, “Spatial properties of binocular neurons in the human visual system,” Exp. Brain Res. 27, 221–232 (1977). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. C. Braccini, G. Gambardella, G. Suetta, “A noise masking experiment in grating perception at threshold: the implications on binocular summation,” Vision Res. 20, 373–376 (1980). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. G. E. Legge, “Binocular contrast summation. I. Detection and discrimination,” Vision Res. 24, 373–383 (1984). [CrossRef]
  6. J. Gilchrist, S. Pardhan, “Binocular contrast detection with unequal monocular illuminance,” Ophthalmol. Physiol. Opt. 7, 373–377 (1987). [CrossRef]
  7. W. J. M. Levelt, On Binocular Rivalry (Mouton, The Hague, 1965).
  8. D. Y. Teller, E. Galanter, “Brightness, luminances, and Fechner’s paradox,” Percept. Psychophys. 2, 297–300 (1967). [CrossRef]
  9. G. R. Engel, “The visual process underlying binocular brightness summation,” Vision Res. 7, 753–767 (1967). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. D. W. Curtis, S. J. Rule, “Binocular processing of brightness information: a vector-sum model,”J. Exp. Psychol. 4, 132–143 (1978).
  11. G. E. Legge, “Spatial frequency masking in human vision: binocular interactions,”J. Opt. Soc. Am. 69, 838–847 (1979). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. G. E. Legge, G. S. Rubin, “Binocular interaction in suprathreshold contrast interactions,” Percept. Psychophys. 30, 49–61 (1981). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. R. Blake, W. Martens, A. Di Gianfillipo, “Reaction time as a measure of binocular interaction in human vision,” Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 19, 930–941 (1980). [PubMed]
  14. R. S. Harwerth, E. L. Smith, D. M. Levi, “Suprathreshold binocular interactions for grating patterns,” Percept. Psychophys. 27, 43–50 (1980). [CrossRef]
  15. R. Blake, R. Fox, “The psychophysical inquiry into binocular summation,” Percept. Psychophys. 14, 161–185 (1973). [CrossRef]
  16. R. Blake, M. Sloane, R. Fox, “Further developments in binocular summation,” Percept. Psychophys. 30, 266–276 (1981). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. A. Arditi, “Binocular vision,” in Handbook of Perception and Human Performance, K. R. Boff, L. Kaufman, J. P. Thomas, eds. (Wiley, New York, 1986).
  18. L. Frisen, B. Lindblom, “Binocular summation in humans: evidence for a hierarchic model,”J. Physiol. (London) 402, 773–782 (1988).
  19. A. P. Ginsburg, “Specifying relevant spatial information for image evaluation and display designs: an explanation of how we see certain objects,” Proc. Soc. Inf. Disp. 21, 219–227 (1980).
  20. S. Pardhan, J. Gilchrist, W. Douthwaite, “The effect of spatial frequency on binocular contrast inhibition,” Ophthalmol. Physiol. Opt. 9, 46–49 (1989). [CrossRef]
  21. E. Faye, Clinical Low Vision (Little, Brown, Toronto, 1984).
  22. E. Barany, “A theory of binocular visual acuity and an analysis of the variability of visual acuity,” Acta Ophthalmol. 24, 63–92 (1946).
  23. M. W. Horowitz, “An analysis of the superiority of binocular over, monocular visual acuity,”J. Exp. Psychol. 39, 581–596 (1949). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. D. Kahneman, J. Norman, M. Kubovy, “Critical duration for the resolution of form: centrally or peripherally determined?”J. Exp. Psychol. 73, 323–327 (1967). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. R. Home, “Binocular summation: a study of contrast sensitivity, visual acuity and recognition,” Vision Res. 18, 579–585 (1984). [CrossRef]
  26. S. Pardhan, D. B. Elliott, “Clinical measurements of binocular summation and inhibition in patients with cataract,” Clin. Vision Sci. 6, 355–359 (1991).
  27. F. L. Ferris, A. Kassoff, G. H. Bresnick, I. L. Bailey, “New visual acuity charts for clinical research,” Am. J. Ophthalmol. 94, 91–96 (1982). [PubMed]
  28. A. Arditi, R. Cagenello, “A computer-based optotype acuity test system suitable for evaluation of acuity charts,” in Noninuasive Assessment of the Visual System, Vol. 1 of 1992 OSA Technical Digest Series (Optical Society of America, Washington, D.C., 1992), pp. 88–91.
  29. A. Arditi, R. Cagenello, “On the statistical reliability of letter-chart visual acuity measurements,” Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 34, 120–124 (1993). [PubMed]
  30. I. L. Bailey, J. E. Lovie, “New design principles for visual acuity letter charts,” Am. J. Optom. Physiol. Opt. 53, 740–745 (1976). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  31. E. E. Birch, “Binocular processing of contrast: a vector sum model,” Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. Suppl. 18, 246 (1979).
  32. G. J. Iverson, J. A. Movshon, A. Arditi, “Binocular additivity of monocular contrasts,” Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. Suppl. 20, 224 (1981).
  33. V. Virsu, J. Rovamo, “Visual resolution, contrast sensitivity, and the cortical magnification factor,” Exp. Brain Res. 37, 475–494 (1979). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. P. R. Herse, H. E. Bedell, “Contrast sensitivity for letter and grating targets under various stimulus conditions,” Optom. Vision Sci. 69, 774–781 (1989). [CrossRef]
  35. D. H. Parish, G. Sperling, “Object spatial frequencies, retinal spatial frequencies, noise, and the efficiency of letter discrimination,” Vision Res. 31, 1399–1415 (1991). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. G. E. Legge, “Binocular contrast summation. II. Quadratic summation,” Vision Res. 24, 385–394 (1984). [CrossRef]
  37. P. A. Anderson, A. J. Movshon, “Binocular combination of contrast signals,” Vision Res. 29, 1115–1132 (1989). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. F. W. Campbell, D. G. Green, “Optical and retinal factors affecting visual resolution,”J. Physiol. (London) 181, 576–593 (1965).
  39. M. E. Sloane, C. Owsley, S. L. Alvarez, “Aging, senile miosis and spatial contrast sensitivity at low luminance,” Vision Res. 28, 1235–1246 (1988). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  40. C. D. Kay, J. D. Morrison, “A quantitative investigation into the effects of pupil diameter and defocus on contrast sensitivity for an extended range of spatial frequencies in natural and homatropinized eyes,” Ophthalmol. Physiol. Opt. 7, 21–30 (1987). [CrossRef]
  41. R. D. Freeman, I. Ohzawa, “On the neurophysiological organization of binocular vision,” Vision Res. 30, 1661–1676 (1990). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

Cited By

Alert me when this paper is cited

OSA is able to provide readers links to articles that cite this paper by participating in CrossRef's Cited-By Linking service. CrossRef includes content from more than 3000 publishers and societies. In addition to listing OSA journal articles that cite this paper, citing articles from other participating publishers will also be listed.


« Previous Article  |  Next Article »

OSA is a member of CrossRef.

CrossCheck Deposited