OSA's Digital Library

Journal of the Optical Society of America A

Journal of the Optical Society of America A

| OPTICS, IMAGE SCIENCE, AND VISION

  • Vol. 11, Iss. 5 — May. 1, 1994
  • pp: 1680–1684

Images, statistics, and textures: implications of triple correlation uniqueness for texture statistics and the Julesz conjecture: comment

Jonathan D. Victor  »View Author Affiliations


JOSA A, Vol. 11, Issue 5, pp. 1680-1684 (1994)
http://dx.doi.org/10.1364/JOSAA.11.001680


View Full Text Article

Enhanced HTML    Acrobat PDF (728 KB)





Browse Journals / Lookup Meetings

Browse by Journal and Year


   


Lookup Conference Papers

Close Browse Journals / Lookup Meetings

Article Tools

Share
Citations

Abstract

The mathematical framework for studies of texture perception is discussed. Textures correspond to statistical ensembles, whereas images are spatially finite samples of a texture. The main ideas underlying the use of visual textures in experimental and theoretical analyses of preattentive vision are summarized, with an emphasis on the distinction between texture ensembles and images. The Julesz conjecture [ Perception 2, 391 ( 1973)] is that preattentive discrimination of textures is possible only for textures that have different second-order correlation statistics. Recently Yellot [ J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 10, 777 ( 1993)] claimed that the triple correlation uniqueness (TCU) theorem, a mathematical result that every monochromatic image of finite size is uniquely determined (up to translation) by its third-order statistics, makes higher-order variants of the Julesz conjecture trivial. However, the TCU theorem applies to individual images, and not to texture ensembles, and thus is of limited relevance to the study of texture perception.

© 1994 Optical Society of America

History
Original Manuscript: June 4, 1993
Revised Manuscript: December 8, 1993
Manuscript Accepted: December 8, 1993
Published: May 1, 1994

Citation
Jonathan D. Victor, "Images, statistics, and textures: implications of triple correlation uniqueness for texture statistics and the Julesz conjecture: comment," J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 11, 1680-1684 (1994)
http://www.opticsinfobase.org/josaa/abstract.cfm?URI=josaa-11-5-1680


Sort:  Author  |  Year  |  Journal  |  Reset  

References

  1. J. Yellott, “Implications of triple correlation uniqueness for texture statistics and the Julesz conjecture,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 10, 777–793 (1993).
  2. B. Julesz, E. N. Gilbert, L. A. Shepp, H. L. Frisch, “Inability of humans to discriminate between visual textures that agree in second-order statistics—revisited,” Perception 2, 391–405 (1973).
  3. T. Caelli, B. Julesz, “On perceptual analyzers underlying visual texture discrimination. Part I,” Biol. Cybern. 28, 167–175 (1978).
  4. T. Caelli, B. Julesz, E. N. Gilbert, “On perceptual analyzers underlying visual texture discrimination. Part II,” Biol. Cybern. 29, 201–214 (1978).
  5. J. D. Victor, S. Brodie, “Discriminable textures with identical Buffon needle statistics,” Biol. Cybern. 31, 231–234 (1978).
  6. C. Chubb, M. S. Landy, “Orthogonal distribution analysis: a new approach to the study of texture perception,” in Computational Models of Visual Processing, M. S. Landy, J. A. Movshon, eds. (MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass., 1991), pp. 201–230.
  7. B. Julesz, E. N. Gilbert, J. D. Victor, “Visual discrimination of textures with identical third-order statistics,” Biol. Cybern. 31, 137–149 (1978).
  8. E. N. Gilbert, “Random colorings of a lattice on squares in the plane,” SIAM J. Alg. Discr. Meth. 1, 152–159 (1980).
  9. J. A. Movshon, E. H. Adelson, M. S. Gizzi, W. T. Newsome, “The analysis of moving visual patterns,” in Pattern Recognition Mechanisms, Exp. Brain Res. Suppl.11, C. Chagas, R. Gattass, C. Gross, eds. (Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1985), pp. 117–151.
  10. T. Poggio, V. Torre, C. Koch, “Computational vision and regularization theory,” Nature 317, 314–319 (1985).
  11. P. Z. Marmarelis, V. Z. Marmarelis, Analysis of Physiological Systems: The White-Noise Approach (Plenum, New York, 1978).
  12. J. D. Victor, “Complex visual textures as a tool for studying the VEP,” Vision Res. 25, 1811–1827 (1985).
  13. J. D. Victor, V. Zemon, “The human visual evoked potential: analysis of components due to elementary and complex aspects of form,” Vision Res. 25, 1829–1844 (1985).
  14. J. D. Victor, M. M. Conte, “Cortical interactions in texture processing: scale and dynamics,” Vis. Neurosci. 2, 297–313 (1989).
  15. J. D. Victor, M. M. Conte, “Spatial organization of nonlinear interactions in form perception,” Vision Res. 31, 1457–1488 (1991).
  16. A. Gagalowitz, “A new method for texture fields synthesis: some applications to the study of human vision,” IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. PAMI-3, 520–523 (1981).
  17. B. Julesz, “Early vision and focal attention,” Rev. Mod. Phys. 63, 735–772 (1991).

Cited By

Alert me when this paper is cited

OSA is able to provide readers links to articles that cite this paper by participating in CrossRef's Cited-By Linking service. CrossRef includes content from more than 3000 publishers and societies. In addition to listing OSA journal articles that cite this paper, citing articles from other participating publishers will also be listed.

Figures

Fig. 1
 

« Previous Article  |  Next Article »

OSA is a member of CrossRef.

CrossCheck Deposited