OSA's Digital Library

Journal of the Optical Society of America A

Journal of the Optical Society of America A


  • Vol. 11, Iss. 7 — Jul. 1, 1994
  • pp: 1940–1948

Correspondence-based and energy-based detection of second-order motion in human vision

Andrew T. Smith  »View Author Affiliations

JOSA A, Vol. 11, Issue 7, pp. 1940-1948 (1994)

View Full Text Article

Enhanced HTML    Acrobat PDF (1995 KB)

Browse Journals / Lookup Meetings

Browse by Journal and Year


Lookup Conference Papers

Close Browse Journals / Lookup Meetings

Article Tools



Motion in the retinal image may occur either in the form of spatiotemporal variations in luminance (first-order motion) or as spatiotemporal variations in characteristics derived from luminance, such as contrast (second-order motion). Second-order motion patterns were employed in an attempt to establish the principles used for the detection of image motion in the human visual system. In principle, one can detect motion at a high level of visual analysis by identifying features of the image and tracking their positions (correspondence-based detection) or at a low level by analysis of spatiotemporal luminance variations without reference to features (intensity-based detection). Prevailing models favor the latter approach, which has been adapted to account for the visibility of second-order motion by postulation of a stage of rectification that precedes motion energy detection [ J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 5, 1986 ( 1988)]. In two experiments it is shown that second-order motion is indeed detected normally by use of the strategy of transformation plus energy detection but that detection can also be achieved by use of the feature-correspondence strategy when the intensity strategy fails. In the first experiment, a stimulus is employed in which opposite directions of motion perception are predicted by the two strategies. It is shown that normally the direction associated with motion energy in the rectified image is seen but that the direction associated with feature motion is seen when the energy system is disabled by the use of an interstimulus interval. In the second experiment, masking of features is shown to have little effect on motion detection under normal conditions but a marked effect when an interstimulus interval is employed, suggesting that features are used in the latter case but not in the former.

© 1994 Optical Society of America

Original Manuscript: October 25, 1993
Revised Manuscript: February 2, 1994
Manuscript Accepted: February 14, 1994
Published: July 1, 1994

Andrew T. Smith, "Correspondence-based and energy-based detection of second-order motion in human vision," J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 11, 1940-1948 (1994)

Sort:  Author  |  Year  |  Journal  |  Reset  


  1. S. Ullman, The Interpretation of Visual Motion (MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass., 1979).
  2. E. H. Adelson, J. R. Bergen, “Spatiotemporal energy models for the perception of motion,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 2, 284–299 (1985). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. O. Braddick, “A short-range process in apparent motion,” Vision Res. 14, 519–527 (1974). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. O. J. Braddick, “Low-level and high-level processes in apparent motion,” Phil. Trans. R. Soc. London B 290, 137–151 (1980). [CrossRef]
  5. S. M. Anstis, “The perception of apparent movement,” Phil. Trans. R. Soc. London B 290, 153–168 (1980). [CrossRef]
  6. P. Cavanagh, G. Mather, “Motion: the long and short of it,” Spatial Vis. 4, 103–129 (1989). [CrossRef]
  7. P. Cavanagh, “Short-range vs. long-range motion: not a valid distinction,” Spatial Vis. 5, 303–309 (1991). [CrossRef]
  8. P. Cavanagh, “Attention-based motion perception,” Science 257, 1563–1565 (1992). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. C. Chubb, G. Sperling, “Drift-balanced random stimuli: a general basis for studying non-Fourier motion perception,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 5, 1986–2006 (1988). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. H. R. Wilson, V. P. Ferrera, C. Yo, “A psychophysically motivated model for two-dimensional motion perception,” Vis. Neurosci. 9, 79–97 (1992). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. E. H. Adelson, “Some new motion illusions, and some old ones, analyzed in terms of their Fourier components,” Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. Suppl. 34, 144 (1982).
  12. M. A. Georgeson, T. M. Shackleton, “Monocular motion sensing, binocular motion perception,” Vision Res. 29, 1511–1523 (1989). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. M. A. Georgeson, M. G. Harris, “The temporal range of motion sensing and motion perception,” Vision Res. 30, 615–619 (1990). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. S. T. Hamett, T. Ledgeway, A. T. Smith, “Transparent motion from feature and luminance-based processes,” Vision Res. 33, 1119–1122 (1993). [CrossRef]
  15. G. B. Henning, B. G. Hertz, D. E. Broadbent, “Some experiments bearing on the hypothesis that the visual system analyses spatial patterns in independent bands of spatial frequency,” Vision Res. 15, 887–897 (1975). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. W. Weibull, “A statistical distribution function of wide applicability,” J. Appl. Mech. 18, 292–297 (1951).
  17. A. T. Smith, R. F. Hess, J. C. L. Baker, “Direction identification thresholds for second-order motion in central and peripheral vision,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 11, 506–514 (1994). [CrossRef]
  18. S. J. Anderson, D. C. Burr, “Spatial and temporal selectivity of the human motion detecting system,” Vision Res. 25, 1147–1154 (1985). [CrossRef]
  19. A. Johnston, P. W. McOwen, H. Buxton, “A computational model of the analysis of some first-order and second-order motion patterns by simple and complex cells,” Proc. R. Soc. London B 250, 297–306 (1992). [CrossRef]
  20. N. M. Grzywacz, “One-path model for contrast-independent perception of Fourier and non-Fourier motions,” Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 33, 954 (1992).
  21. A. M. Derrington, D. Badcock, “Separate detectors for simple and complex patterns?” Vision Res. 25, 1869–1878 (1985). [CrossRef]
  22. G. Mather, S. West, “Evidence for second-order motion detectors,” Vision Res. 33, 1109–1112 (1993). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. T. Ledgeway, A. T. Smith, “Evidence for separate motion-detecting mechanisms for first- and second-order motion in human vision,” Vision Res. (to be published).
  24. L. R. Harris, A. T. Smith, “Motion defined exclusively by second-order characteristics does not evoke optokinetic nystagmus,” Visual Neurosci. 9, 565–570 (1992). [CrossRef]
  25. K.-P. Hoffmann, “Visual input relevant for the optokinetic nystagmus in mammals,” in Progress in Brain Research, H. -J. Freund, U. Büttner, B. Cohen, J. Noth, eds. (Elsevier, Amsterdam, 1986). [CrossRef]
  26. K. Turano, “Evidence for a common motion mechanism of luminance-modulated and contrast-modulated patterns: selective adaptation,” Perception 20, 455–466 (1991). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. T. D. Albright, “Form-cue invariant motion processing in primate visual cortex,” Science 255, 1141–1143 (1992). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Y.-X. Zhou, C. L. Baker, “A processing stream in mammalian visual cortex neurons for non-Fourier responses,” Science 261, 98–100 (1993). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. A. T. Smith, “Two mechanisms for detecting second-order motion,” Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 34, 1363 (1993).
  30. A. T. Smith, “Energy-based and feature-based mechanisms for detecting second-order motion,” Perception 22, 31 (1993).

Cited By

Alert me when this paper is cited

OSA is able to provide readers links to articles that cite this paper by participating in CrossRef's Cited-By Linking service. CrossRef includes content from more than 3000 publishers and societies. In addition to listing OSA journal articles that cite this paper, citing articles from other participating publishers will also be listed.

« Previous Article  |  Next Article »

OSA is a member of CrossRef.

CrossCheck Deposited