OSA's Digital Library

Journal of the Optical Society of America A

Journal of the Optical Society of America A


  • Vol. 12, Iss. 10 — Oct. 1, 1995
  • pp: 2358–2366

Double-pass measurements of the retinal-image quality with unequal entrance and exit pupil sizes and the reversibility of the eye’s optical system

Pablo Artal, Ignacio Iglesias, Norberto López-Gil, and Daniel G. Green  »View Author Affiliations

JOSA A, Vol. 12, Issue 10, pp. 2358-2366 (1995)

View Full Text Article

Enhanced HTML    Acrobat PDF (3470 KB)

Browse Journals / Lookup Meetings

Browse by Journal and Year


Lookup Conference Papers

Close Browse Journals / Lookup Meetings

Article Tools



We have used a modified double-pass apparatus with unequal entrance and exit pupil sizes to measure the optical transfer function in the human eye and have applied the technique to three different problems. First, we confirm that in the eye the double-pass spread function is the cross correlation of the input spread function with the output spread function [ J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 12, 195 ( 1995)]. Consequently, when entrance and exit pupil sizes are equal, phase information is lost from the double-pass images. Second, we show that in double-pass measurements the eye behaves like a reversible optical system. That is, when entrance and exit pupils are equal, the double-pass image results from two passes through an optical system having a transfer function that is the same in both directions. To test for reversibility in the living eye we have used a double-pass apparatus with different exit and entrance pupil sizes (one of them small enough to consider the eye diffraction limited), so that the ingoing and the outgoing transfer functions are different. The measured image quality was unchanged when the pupils were interchanged, i.e., when the first-pass entrance pupil size becomes the second-pass exit pupil size, and vice versa. Third, the technique provides a means for inferring the complete optical transfer function of the eye, including the phase transfer function, and the shape of the point-spread function.

© 1995 Optical Society of America

Original Manuscript: January 17, 1995
Revised Manuscript: May 15, 1995
Manuscript Accepted: May 25, 1995
Published: October 1, 1995

Pablo Artal, Daniel G. Green, Ignacio Iglesias, and Norberto López-Gil, "Double-pass measurements of the retinal-image quality with unequal entrance and exit pupil sizes and the reversibility of the eye’s optical system," J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 12, 2358-2366 (1995)

Sort:  Author  |  Year  |  Journal  |  Reset  


  1. M. F. Flamant, “Étude de la repartition de lumière dans l’image retinienne d’une fente,” Rev. Opt. 34, 433–459 (1955).
  2. F. W. Campbell, R. W. Gubisch, “Optical image quality of the human eye,” J. Physiol. (London) 186, 558–578 (1966).
  3. J. Santamaría, P. Artal, J. Bescós, “Determination of the point-spread function of human eyes using a hybrid optical–digital method,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 4, 1109–1114 (1987). [CrossRef]
  4. R. Navarro, P. Artal, D. R. Williams, “Modulation transfer of the human eye as a function of retinal eccentricity,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 10, 201–212 (1993). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. P. Artal, R. Navarro, “Monochromatic modulation transfer function of the human eye for different pupil diameters: an analytical expression,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 11, 246–249 (1994). [CrossRef]
  6. P. Artal, S. Marcos, R. Navarro, M. Ferro, I. Miranda, “Through focus image quality with monofocal and multifocal intraocular lenses,” Opt. Eng. 34, 772–779 (1995). [CrossRef]
  7. P. Artal, S. Marcos, R. Navarro, D. R. Williams, “Odd aberrations and double-pass measurements of retinal image quality,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 12, 195–201 (1995). [CrossRef]
  8. M. Born, E. Wolf, Principles of Optics, 6th ed. (Pergamon, Oxford, 1980).
  9. G. J. van Blokland, D. van Norren, “Intensity and polarization of light scattered at small angles from the human fovea,” Vision Res. 26, 485–494 (1986). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. D. R. Williams, D. Brainard, M. MacHahon, R. Navarro, “Double-pass and interferometric measures of the optical quality of the eye,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 11, 3123–3135 (1994). [CrossRef]
  11. D. Sliney, M. Wolbarsht, Safety with Laser and Other Optical Sources (Plenum, New York, 1980).
  12. H. C. Howland, B. Howland, “Subjective method for the measurement of monochromatic aberrations of the eye,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. 67, 1508–1518 (1977). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. M. C. W. Campbell, E. M. Harrison, P. Simonet, “Psychophysical measurements of the blur on the retina due to the optical aberrations of the eye,” Vision Res. 30, 1587–1602 (1990). [CrossRef]
  14. D. G. Green, “Visual resolution when light enters through different parts of the pupil,” J. Physiol. (London) 190, 583–593 (1967).
  15. S. Marcos, P. Artal, D. G. Green, “The effect of decentered small pupils on ocular modulation transfer and contrast sensitivity,” Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. Suppl. 35, 1258 (1994).
  16. P. Artal, R. Navarro, “Simultaneous measurement of two-point-spread functions at different locations across the human fovea,” Appl. Opt. 31, 3646–3656 (1992). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. P. Artal, J. Santamaría, J. Bescós, “Retrieval of the wave aberration of human eyes from actual point-spread function data,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 5, 1201–1206 (1988). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

Cited By

Alert me when this paper is cited

OSA is able to provide readers links to articles that cite this paper by participating in CrossRef's Cited-By Linking service. CrossRef includes content from more than 3000 publishers and societies. In addition to listing OSA journal articles that cite this paper, citing articles from other participating publishers will also be listed.

« Previous Article  |  Next Article »

OSA is a member of CrossRef.

CrossCheck Deposited