OSA's Digital Library

Journal of the Optical Society of America A

Journal of the Optical Society of America A


  • Vol. 13, Iss. 10 — Oct. 1, 1996
  • pp: 1953–1959

Contrast perception across changes in luminance and spatial frequency

Eli Peli, Lawrence Arend, and Angela T. Labianca  »View Author Affiliations

JOSA A, Vol. 13, Issue 10, pp. 1953-1959 (1996)

View Full Text Article

Enhanced HTML    Acrobat PDF (250 KB)

Browse Journals / Lookup Meetings

Browse by Journal and Year


Lookup Conference Papers

Close Browse Journals / Lookup Meetings

Article Tools



The interaction of the effects of luminance and spatial frequency on perception of suprathreshold contrast was studied with use of a contrast-matching paradigm. Four subjects matched the appearance of Gabor patches at different luminances and spatial frequencies. The contrast of a 1-octave Gabor test patch at one of five frequencies [1–16 cycles/degree (c/deg) in 1-octave steps] and at one of seven mean luminance levels (0.5–50 cd/m2 in 1/3-log-unit steps) was matched, by the method of adjustment to a standard patch of 3 c/deg at 50 cd/m2 at a nominal contrast of 0.3. For each block of trials the spatial frequency of the test patch was randomly changed (three repetitions at each frequency per block) while the luminance was fixed. The subject regularly shifted fixation between the two targets in response to a metronome tone every 1.5 s. Contrast constancy was demonstrated across the entire luminance range tested for all but the two highest frequencies. For 8 c/deg the perceived test contrast was reduced only when the luminance was less than 2 cd/m2. For 16 c/deg, perceived contrast decreased linearly (with a slope of −1/2 on a log scale) with decreases in luminance across the entire luminance range. As at threshold, reduction in luminance across the levels commonly available on a CRT display has only minimal effects on low-frequency suprathreshold contrast perception. However, the apparent contrast of high-frequency features, in binocular free-viewing conditions, is rapidly reduced with a local reduction in screen luminance. This effect has important implications for visual models used in image-quality analysis.

© 1996 Optical Society of America

Original Manuscript: January 31, 1996
Revised Manuscript: May 28, 1996
Manuscript Accepted: May 31, 1996
Published: October 1, 1996

Eli Peli, Lawrence Arend, and Angela T. Labianca, "Contrast perception across changes in luminance and spatial frequency," J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 13, 1953-1959 (1996)

Sort:  Author  |  Year  |  Journal  |  Reset  


  1. M. A. Georgeson, G. D. Sullivan, “Contrast constancy: deblurring in human vision by spatial frequency channels,” J. Physiol. (London) 252, 627–656 (1975).
  2. J. J. Kulikowski, “Effective contrast constancy and linearity of contrast sensation,” Vision Res. 16, 1419–1431 (1976). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. M. W. Cannon, “Perceived contrast in the fovea and periphery,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 2, 1760–1768 (1985). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. R. F. Hess, “The Edridge-Green Lecture: Vision at low light levels: role of spatial, temporal and contrast filters,” Ophthalmic Physiol. Opt. 10, 351–359 (1990). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. E. Peli, J. Yang, R. Goldstein, A. Reeves, “Effect of luminance on suprathreshold contrast perception,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 8, 1352–1359 (1991). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. D. A. Burkhardt, J. Gottesman, D. Kersten, G. E. Legge, “Symmetry and constancy in the perception of negative and positive luminance contrast,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 1, 309–316 (1984). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. F. L. van Nes, M. A. Bouman, “Spatial modulation transfer in the human eye,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. 57, 401–406 (1967). [CrossRef]
  8. E. Peli, “Simulating normal and low vision,” in Vision Models for Target Detection and Recognition, E. Peli, ed. (World Scientific, Singapore, 1995), Vol. 2, pp. 63–87. [CrossRef]
  9. J. Lubin, “A visual discrimination model for imaging system design and evaluation,” in Vision Models for Target Detection and Recognition, E. Peli, ed. (World Scientific, Singapore, 1995), Vol. 2, pp. 245–283. [CrossRef]
  10. A. B. Watson, H. B. Barlow, J. G. Robson, “What does the eye see best?” Nature 302, 419–422 (1983). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. E. Peli, “Suprathreshold contrast perception across differences in mean luminance: effects of stimulus size, dichoptic presentation, and length of adaptation,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 12, 817–823 (1995). [CrossRef]
  12. A. S. Patel, “Spatial resolution by the human visual system. The effect of mean retinal illuminance,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. 56, 689–694 (1966). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. A. R. Biondini, M. L. F. de Mattiello, “Suprathreshold contrast perception at different luminance levels,” Vision Res. 25, 1–9 (1985). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. B. R. Stephens, M. S. Banks, “The development of contrast constancy,” J. Exp. Child. Psychol. 40, 528–547 (1985). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Gordon Legge, University of Minnesota, 75 E. River Rd., Minneapolis, Minn. 55455 (personal communication, December1994).
  16. L. E. Arend, B. Spehar, “Lightness, brightness, and brightness contrast: 1. Illuminance variation,” Percept. Psychophys. 54, 446–456 (1993). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

Cited By

Alert me when this paper is cited

OSA is able to provide readers links to articles that cite this paper by participating in CrossRef's Cited-By Linking service. CrossRef includes content from more than 3000 publishers and societies. In addition to listing OSA journal articles that cite this paper, citing articles from other participating publishers will also be listed.

Next Article »

OSA is a member of CrossRef.

CrossCheck Deposited