OSA's Digital Library

Journal of the Optical Society of America A

Journal of the Optical Society of America A


  • Vol. 15, Iss. 12 — Dec. 1, 1998
  • pp: 2951–2965

Use of image-based information in judgments of surface-reflectance properties

Shin’ya Nishida and Mikio Shinya  »View Author Affiliations

JOSA A, Vol. 15, Issue 12, pp. 2951-2965 (1998)

View Full Text Article

Acrobat PDF (2151 KB)

Browse Journals / Lookup Meetings

Browse by Journal and Year


Lookup Conference Papers

Close Browse Journals / Lookup Meetings

Article Tools



We examined how well we can recover surface-reflectance properties from shading patterns under changes in surface shape. The stimulus we used was a square surface modulated in depth by a low-pass-filtered random field and rendered by the Phong illumination model [Commun. ACM <b>18</b>, 311 (1975)]. Two different surface images (target and match) were presented side by side, with either the viewing direction or the surface-normal direction rotating around the horizontal axis. The target shape was manipulated by changing the spatial spectrum, and the target reflectance was manipulated by changing the diffuse-reflection coefficient and the specular-reflection exponent (shininess) of the Phong model. The shape parameters of the match stimulus were fixed, but its reflectance parameters were under the control of subjects, who had to make the apparent reflectance of the two surfaces as similar as possible. The results showed that the constant error (difference between simulated and matched values) was large except when the two surfaces had the same shape parameters or when they differed only in scale. The pattern of the constant errors and response variabilities suggests that the judgments of the subjects were based on the similarity of the luminance histogram of the surface image. Our results demonstrate a limitation of surface-reflectance constancy for changes in shape and the importance of image-based information in reflectance judgments. The results are discussed in relation to previous studies that showed effects of spatial layout on surface-reflectance perception.

© 1998 Optical Society of America

OCIS Codes
(330.5000) Vision, color, and visual optics : Vision - patterns and recognition
(330.5510) Vision, color, and visual optics : Psychophysics
(330.6100) Vision, color, and visual optics : Spatial discrimination

Shin’ya Nishida and Mikio Shinya, "Use of image-based information in judgments of surface-reflectance properties," J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 15, 2951-2965 (1998)

Sort:  Author  |  Year  |  Journal  |  Reset


  1. A. L. Gilchrist, “When does perceived lightness depend on perceived spatial arrangement?” Percept. Psychophys. 28, 527–538 (1980).
  2. M. D’Zmura, “Shading ambiguity: reflectance and illumination,” in Computational Models of Visual Processing, M. S. Landy and J. A. Movshon, eds. (MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass., 1991), pp. 187–208.
  3. M. Cohen and J. Wallace, Radiosity and Realistic Image Synthesis (Academic Press Professional, Cambridge, Mass., 1993).
  4. E. H. Land, “Recent advances in retinex theory,” Vision Res. 26, 7–22 (1986).
  5. D. H. Brainard and B. A. Wandell, “Asymmetric color matching: how color appearance depends on the illuminant,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 9, 1433–1448 (1992).
  6. A. L. Gilchrist, “Perceived lightness depends on perceived spatial arrangement,” Science 195, 185–187 (1977).
  7. A. L. Gilchrist, “The perception of surface blacks and whites,” Sci. Am. 240, 112–124 (1979).
  8. E. H. Adelson, “Perceptual organization and the judgement of brightness,” Science 262, 2042–2044 (1993).
  9. D. C. Knill and D. Kersten, “Apparent surface curvature affects lightness perception,” Nature (London) 351, 228–230 (1991).
  10. A. Blake and H. Bülthoff, “Does the brain know the physics of specular reflection?” Nature (London) 343, 165–168 (1990).
  11. A. Gilchrist and A. Jacobsen, “Perception of lightness and illumination in a world of one reflectance,” Perception 13, 5–19 (1984).
  12. B. T. Phong, “Illumination for computer generated pictures,” Commun. ACM 18, 311–317 (1975).
  13. J. D. Foley, A. van Dam, S. K. Feiner, and J. F. Hughes, Computer Graphics: Principles and Practice (Addison-Wesley, Reading, Mass., 1990).
  14. E. Hall, Computer Image Processing and Recognition (Academic, New York, 1979).
  15. C. Chubb and M. Landy, “Orthogonal distribution analysis: a new approach to the study of texture perception,” in Computational Models of Visual Processing, M. S. Landy and J. A. Movshon, eds. (MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass., 1991), pp. 291–301.
  16. A. Johnston and W. Curran, “Investigating shape-from-shading illusions using solid objects,” Vision Res. 36, 2827–2835 (1996).
  17. J. T. Todd and F. D. Reichel, “Ordinal structure in the vi-sual perception and cognition of smoothly curved surfaces,” Psychol. Rev. 96, 643–657 (1989).
  18. J. T. Todd and P. Bressan, “The perception of 3-dimensional affine structure from minimal apparent motion sequences,” Percept. Psychophys. 48, 419–430 (1990).
  19. F. E. Pollick, S. Nishida, Y. Koike, and M. Kawato, “Perceived motion in structure from motion: pointing responses to the axis of rotation,” Percept. Psychophys. 56, 91–109 (1994).
  20. A. Johnston and P. J. Passmore, “Independent encoding of surface orientation and surface curvature,” Vision Res. 34, 3005–3012 (1994).
  21. D. Kersten and A. C. Hurlbert, “Discounting the color of mutual illumination: a 3D-shape-induced color phenomenon,” Invest. Ophthalmol. Visual Sci. 37, S1065 (1996).

Cited By

Alert me when this paper is cited

OSA is able to provide readers links to articles that cite this paper by participating in CrossRef's Cited-By Linking service. CrossRef includes content from more than 3000 publishers and societies. In addition to listing OSA journal articles that cite this paper, citing articles from other participating publishers will also be listed.

« Previous Article  |  Next Article »

OSA is a member of CrossRef.

CrossCheck Deposited