OSA's Digital Library

Journal of the Optical Society of America A

Journal of the Optical Society of America A

| OPTICS, IMAGE SCIENCE, AND VISION

  • Vol. 15, Iss. 2 — Feb. 1, 1998
  • pp: 289–296

Insights into motion perception by observer modeling

Roland Baddeley and Srimant P. Tripathy  »View Author Affiliations


JOSA A, Vol. 15, Issue 2, pp. 289-296 (1998)
http://dx.doi.org/10.1364/JOSAA.15.000289


View Full Text Article

Acrobat PDF (335 KB)





Browse Journals / Lookup Meetings

Browse by Journal and Year


   


Lookup Conference Papers

Close Browse Journals / Lookup Meetings

Article Tools

Share
Citations

Abstract

The statistical efficiency of human observers performing a simplified version of the motion detection task of Salzman and Newsome [Science 264, 231 (1994)] is high but not perfect. This reduced efficiency may be caused by noise internal to the observers or by the observers’ using strategies that are different from that used by an ideal machine. We therefore investigated which of three simple models best accounts for the observers’ performance. The models compared were a motion detector that uses the proportion of dots in the first frame that move coherently (as would an ideal machine), a model that bases its decision on the number of dots that move, and a model that differentially weights motions that occur at different locations in the visual field (for instance, differentially weights the point of fixation and the periphery). We compared these models by explicitly modeling the human observers’ performance. We recorded the exact stimulus configuration on each trial together with the observer’s response, and, for the different models, we found the parameters that best predicted the observer’s performance in a least-squares sense. We then used N-fold cross validation to compare the models and hence the associated hypotheses. Our results show that the performance of observers is based on the proportion, not the absolute number, of dots that are moving and that there was no evidence of any differential spatial weighting. Whereas this method of modeling the observers’ response is demonstrated only for one simple psychophysical paradigm, it is general and can be applied to any psychophysical framework in which the entire stimulus can be recorded.

© 1998 Optical Society of America

OCIS Codes
(000.4920) General : Other life sciences
(000.5490) General : Probability theory, stochastic processes, and statistics
(100.3190) Image processing : Inverse problems
(330.4060) Vision, color, and visual optics : Vision modeling
(330.4150) Vision, color, and visual optics : Motion detection
(330.5020) Vision, color, and visual optics : Perception psychology

Citation
Roland Baddeley and Srimant P. Tripathy, "Insights into motion perception by observer modeling," J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 15, 289-296 (1998)
http://www.opticsinfobase.org/josaa/abstract.cfm?URI=josaa-15-2-289

You do not have subscription access to this journal. Citation lists with outbound citation links are available to subscribers only. You may subscribe either as an OSA member, or as an authorized user of your institution.

Contact your librarian or system administrator
or
Log in to access OSA Member Subscription

You do not have subscription access to this journal. Cited by links are available to subscribers only. You may subscribe either as an OSA member, or as an authorized user of your institution.

Contact your librarian or system administrator
or
Log in to access OSA Member Subscription

You do not have subscription access to this journal. Article level metrics are available to subscribers only. You may subscribe either as an OSA member, or as an authorized user of your institution.

Contact your librarian or system administrator
or
Log in to access OSA Member Subscription

Next Article »

OSA is a member of CrossRef.

CrossCheck Deposited