OSA's Digital Library

Journal of the Optical Society of America A

Journal of the Optical Society of America A


  • Vol. 15, Iss. 2 — Feb. 1, 1998
  • pp: 297–306

No role for motion blur in either motion detection or motion-based image segmentation

Felix A. Wichmann and G. Bruce Henning  »View Author Affiliations

JOSA A, Vol. 15, Issue 2, pp. 297-306 (1998)

View Full Text Article

Enhanced HTML    Acrobat PDF (1997 KB)

Browse Journals / Lookup Meetings

Browse by Journal and Year


Lookup Conference Papers

Close Browse Journals / Lookup Meetings

Article Tools



The human contrast sensitivity function is bandpass in form for stimuli of low temporal frequency but low pass for flickering or moving stimuli. Because the loss in sensitivity to moving stimuli is large, images moving on the retina have little perceptible high-spatial-frequency content. The loss of high-spatial-frequency content—often referred to as motion blur—provides a potential cue to motion. The amount of motion blur is a function of stimulus velocity but is significant at velocities encountered by the visual system in everyday situations. Our experiments determined the influence of high-spatial-frequency losses induced by motion of this order on motion detection and on motion-based image segmentation. Motion detection and motion-based segmentation tasks were performed with either spectrally low-pass or spectrally broadband stimuli. Performance on these tasks was compared with a condition having no motion but in which form differences mimicked the perceptual loss of high spatial frequencies produced by motion. This allowed the relative salience of motion and motion-induced blur to be determined. Neither image segmentation nor motion detection was sensitive to the high-spatial-frequency content of the stimuli. Thus the change in perceptual form produced in moving stimuli is not normally used as a cue either for motion detection or for motion-based image segmentation in ordinary situations.

© 1998 Optical Society of America

OCIS Codes
(330.1800) Vision, color, and visual optics : Vision - contrast sensitivity
(330.4150) Vision, color, and visual optics : Motion detection
(330.5000) Vision, color, and visual optics : Vision - patterns and recognition

Original Manuscript: April 24, 1997
Manuscript Accepted: September 8, 1997
Published: February 1, 1998

Felix A. Wichmann and G. Bruce Henning, "No role for motion blur in either motion detection or motion-based image segmentation," J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 15, 297-306 (1998)

Sort:  Author  |  Year  |  Journal  |  Reset  


  1. Z.-L. Lu, G. Sperling, “The functional architecture of human visual motion perception,” Vision Res. 35, 2697–2722 (1995). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. D. J. Field, “Relations between the statistics of natural images and the response properties of cortical cells,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 4, 2379–2394 (1987). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. D. H. Kelly, “Motion and vision. II. Stabilized spatio-temporal threshold surface,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. 69, 1340–1349 (1979). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. D. H. Kelly, “Theory of flicker and transient responses. II. Counterphase gratings,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. 61, 632–640 (1971). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. D. H. Kelly, “Theory of flicker and transient responses. I. Uniform fields,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. 61, 537–546 (1971). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. D. H. Kelly, “Adaptation effects on spatio-temporal sine-wave thresholds,” Vision Res. 12, 89–101 (1972). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. G. B. Henning, “Spatial-frequency tuning as a function of temporal frequency and stimulus motion,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 5, 1362–1373 (1988). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. J. G. Robson, “Spatial and temporal contrast-sensitivity functions of the visual system,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. 56, 1141–1142 (1966). [CrossRef]
  9. O. H. Schade, “Optical and photoelectric analogue of the eye,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. 46, 721–739 (1956). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. A. Logvinenko, “Linear-motion blur as spatial-frequency filtering,” Perception (Suppl.) 24, 126 (1995).
  11. A. B. Watson, “Temporal sensitivity,” in Handbook of Perception and Human Performance, K. R. Boff, L. Kaufman, J. P. Thomas, eds. (Wiley, New York, 1986), pp. 6.1–6.43.
  12. A. B. Watson, A. J. Ahumada, J. E. Farrell, “The window of visibility: a psychophysical theory of fidelity in time-sampled visual motion displays,” (NASA, Washington, D.C., 1983).
  13. A. B. Watson, A. J. Ahumada, J. E. Farrell, “Window of visibility—a psychophysical theory of fidelity in time-sampled visual-motion displays,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 3, 300–307 (1986). [CrossRef]
  14. M. Fahle, T. Poggio, “Visual hyperacuity: spatiotemporal interpolation in human vision,” Proc. R. Soc. London, Ser. B 213, 451–477 (1981). [CrossRef]
  15. D. E. Pearson, Transmission and Display of Pictorial Information (Wiley, New York, 1975).
  16. J. J. Koenderink, A. J. van Doorn, “Spatiotemporal contrast detection threshold surface is bimodal,” Opt. Lett. 4, 32–34 (1979). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. M. P. Eckert, G. Buchsbaum, “The significance of eye movements and image acceleration for coding television image sequences,” in Digital Images and Human Vision, A. B. Watson, ed. (MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass.,1993), pp. 89–98.
  18. B. Girod, “Eye movements and coding of video sequences,” in Visual Communications and Image Processing ’88: Third in a Series, T. R. Hsing, ed., Proc. SPIE1001, 398–405 (1988). [CrossRef]
  19. B. Girod, “What’s wrong with mean-squared error?” in Digital Images and Human Vision, A. B. Watson, ed. (MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass.1993), pp. 207–220.
  20. D. A. Robinson, “The mechanics of human smooth pursuit eye movement,” J. Physiol. (London) 180, 569–591 (1965).
  21. G. Westheimer, “Eye movement responses to horizontally moving stimulus,” Arch. Opthalmol. 52, 932–941 (1954). [CrossRef]
  22. M. J. Morgan, S. Benton, “Motion-deblurring in human vision,” Nature (London) 340, 385–386 (1989). [CrossRef]
  23. G. Westheimer, S. P. McKee, “Visual acuity in the presence of retinal image motion,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. 65, 847–850 (1975). [CrossRef]
  24. J. M. Wolfe, K. R. Cave, S. L. Franzel, “Guided search: an alternative to the feature integration model for visual search,” J. Exp. Psychol. 15, 419–433 (1989).
  25. A. Treisman, G. Gelade, “A feature integration theory of attention,” Cogn. Psychol. 12, 97–136 (1980). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. A. Treisman, “Preattentive processing in vision,” Comput. Vision Graph. Image Process. 31, 156–177 (1985). [CrossRef]
  27. B. Julesz, “A brief outline of the texton theory of human vision,” Trends Neurosci. 7, 41–45 (1984). [CrossRef]
  28. B. Julesz, J. R. Bergen, “Textons, the fundamental elements in preattentive vision and perceptions of textures,” Bell Syst. Tech. J. 62, 1619–1646 (1983). [CrossRef]
  29. We are indebted to S. Klein, who pointed this out to us. To solve such a task, subjects would presumably perform a contrast discrimination between two subjectively static gratings.
  30. J. Walraven, C. Enroth-Cugell, D. C. Hood, D. I. A. MacLeod, J. L. Schnapf, “The control of visual sensitivity: receptoral and postreceptoral processes,” in Visual Perception: The Neurophysiological Foundations, L. Spillmann, J. S. Werner, eds. (Academic, San Diego, Calif., 1990), pp. 53–101.
  31. F. A. Wichmann, G. B. Henning, “Image segmentation from motion: just the loss of high-spatial-frequency content?” Perception (Suppl.) 24, 19 (1995).
  32. F. A. Wichmann, G. B. Henning, “Does motion-blur facilitate motion detection?” presented at the OSA Annual Meeting, Rochester, New York, October 20–24, 1996.

Cited By

Alert me when this paper is cited

OSA is able to provide readers links to articles that cite this paper by participating in CrossRef's Cited-By Linking service. CrossRef includes content from more than 3000 publishers and societies. In addition to listing OSA journal articles that cite this paper, citing articles from other participating publishers will also be listed.

« Previous Article  |  Next Article »

OSA is a member of CrossRef.

CrossCheck Deposited