Abstract
We present efficient algorithms for image restoration by means of Good’s roughness penalty. We assume Gaussian or Poisson statistics for the noise and derive an algorithm for each case. Performance is tested by simulated three-dimensional imaging with a fluorescence confocal laser scanning microscope. Results are compared with those for algorithms that use Gaussian or entropy penalty terms, which we derived previously [J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 14, 1696 (1997)]. The algorithms based on Good’s roughness yield superior results. An example is given of the restoration of an image of a biological specimen.
© 1998 Optical Society of America
Full Article |
PDF Article
More Like This
Cited By
You do not have subscription access to this journal. Cited by links are available to subscribers only. You may subscribe either as an Optica member, or as an authorized user of your institution.
Contact your librarian or system administrator
or
Login to access Optica Member Subscription
Figures (6)
You do not have subscription access to this journal. Figure files are available to subscribers only. You may subscribe either as an Optica member, or as an authorized user of your institution.
Contact your librarian or system administrator
or
Login to access Optica Member Subscription
Tables (1)
You do not have subscription access to this journal. Article tables are available to subscribers only. You may subscribe either as an Optica member, or as an authorized user of your institution.
Contact your librarian or system administrator
or
Login to access Optica Member Subscription
Equations (27)
You do not have subscription access to this journal. Equations are available to subscribers only. You may subscribe either as an Optica member, or as an authorized user of your institution.
Contact your librarian or system administrator
or
Login to access Optica Member Subscription