OSA's Digital Library

Journal of the Optical Society of America A

Journal of the Optical Society of America A

| OPTICS, IMAGE SCIENCE, AND VISION

  • Vol. 15, Iss. 7 — Jul. 1, 1998
  • pp: 1723–1732

Intrinsic two-dimensional features as textons

Erhardt Barth, Christoph Zetzsche, and Ingo Rentschler  »View Author Affiliations


JOSA A, Vol. 15, Issue 7, pp. 1723-1732 (1998)
http://dx.doi.org/10.1364/JOSAA.15.001723


View Full Text Article

Enhanced HTML    Acrobat PDF (492 KB)





Browse Journals / Lookup Meetings

Browse by Journal and Year


   


Lookup Conference Papers

Close Browse Journals / Lookup Meetings

Article Tools

Share
Citations

Abstract

We suggest that intrinsic two-dimensional (i2D) features, computationally defined as the outputs of nonlinear operators that model the activity of end-stopped neurons, play a role in preattentive texture discrimination. We first show that for discriminable textures with identical power spectra the predictions of traditional models depend on the type of nonlinearity and fail for energy measures. We then argue that the concept of intrinsic dimensionality, and the existence of end-stopped neurons, can help us to understand the role of the nonlinearities. Furthermore, we show examples in which models without strong i2D selectivity fail to predict the correct ranking order of perceptual segregation. Our arguments regarding the importance of i2D features resemble the arguments of Julesz and co-workers regarding textons such as terminators and crossings. However, we provide a computational framework that identifies textons with the outputs of nonlinear operators that are selective to i2D features.

© 1998 Optical Society of America

OCIS Codes
(100.2960) Image processing : Image analysis
(330.7310) Vision, color, and visual optics : Vision

History
Original Manuscript: October 8, 1997
Revised Manuscript: February 23, 1998
Manuscript Accepted: March 2, 1998
Published: July 1, 1998

Citation
Erhardt Barth, Christoph Zetzsche, and Ingo Rentschler, "Intrinsic two-dimensional features as textons," J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 15, 1723-1732 (1998)
http://www.opticsinfobase.org/josaa/abstract.cfm?URI=josaa-15-7-1723


Sort:  Author  |  Year  |  Journal  |  Reset  

References

  1. B. Julesz, B. Kröse, “Features and spatial filters,” Nature 333, 302–303 (1988). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. B. Julesz, “Textons, the elements of texture perception, and their interactions,” Nature 290, 91–97 (1981). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. J. R. Bergen, E. H. Adelson, “Early vision and texture perception,” Nature 333, 363–364 (1988). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. D. Wermser, C.-E. Liedtke, “Texture analysis using a model of the visual system,” in Proceedings of the Sixth International Conference on Pattern Recognition (Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Piscataway, N.J., 1982), pp. 1078–1080.
  5. J. M. Coggins, A. K. Jain, “A spatial filtering approach to texture analysis,” Pattern Recogn. Lett. 3, 195–203 (1985). [CrossRef]
  6. M. R. Turner, “Texture discrimination by Gabor functions,” Biol. Cybern. 55, 71–82 (1986). [PubMed]
  7. C. Zetzsche, W. Schönecker, “Orientation selective filters lead to entropy reduction in the processing of natural images,” Perception 16, 229 (1987).
  8. U. Kriegeskotten-Thiede, C. Zetzsche, “Local amplitude of filter outputs predicts the influence of micropattern spacing, orientation, and elongation on texture discrimination,” Perception 17, 398 (1988).
  9. I. Fogel, D. Sagi, “Gabor filters as texture discriminators,” Biol. Cybern. 61, 103–113 (1989). [CrossRef]
  10. A. Sutter, J. Beck, N. Graham, “Contrast and spatial variables in texture segregation: testing a simple spatial-frequency channels model,” Percept. Psychophys. 46, 312–332 (1989). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. A. C. Bovik, M. Clark, W. S. Geisler, “Multi-channel texture analysis using localized spatial filters,” IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 12, 55–73 (1990). [CrossRef]
  12. J. Malik, P. Perona, “Preattentive texture discrimination with early vision mechanisms,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 7, 923–932 (1990). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. M. S. Landy, J. R. Bergen, “Texture segregation and orientation gradient,” Vision Res. 31, 679–691 (1991). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. N. Graham, J. Beck, A. Sutter, “Nonlinear processes in spatial-frequency channel models of perceived texture segregation: effects of sign and amount of contrast,” Vision Res. 32, 719–743 (1992). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. A. Gorea, T. V. Papathomas, “Double opponency as a generalized concept in texture segregation illustrated with stimuli defined by color, luminance, and orientation,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 10, 1450–1462 (1993). [CrossRef]
  16. T. M. Caelli, “Three processing characteristics of visual texture segmentation,” Spatial Vis. 1, 19–30 (1985). [CrossRef]
  17. T. M. Caelli, “An adaptive computational model for texture segmentation,” IEEE Trans. Semicond. Manuf. 18, 9–17 (1988).
  18. D. Carević, T. Caelli, “Application of partial modelling techniques for texture segmentation,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 14, 2924–2937 (1997). [CrossRef]
  19. H. C. Nothdurft, “Texton segregation by associated differences in global and local luminance distribution,” Proc. R. Soc. London Ser. B 239, 295–320 (1990). [CrossRef]
  20. B. Julesz, “Early vision and focal attention,” Review Mod. Phys. 63, 735–772 (1991). [CrossRef]
  21. J. R. Bergen, “Theories of visual texture perception,” in Vision and Visual Disfunction, D. Regan, ed. (Macmillan, New York, 1991), Vol. 10B, pp. 114–134.
  22. A. Dobbins, S. W. Zucker, M. S. Cynader, “Endstopped neurons in the visual cortex as a substrate for calculating curvature,” Nature 329, 438–441 (1987). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. C. Zetzsche, “Statistical properties of the representation of natural images at different levels in the visual system,” Perception 17, 359 (1988).
  24. J. J. Koenderink, W. Richards, “Two-dimensional curvature operators,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 5, 1136–1141 (1988). [CrossRef]
  25. H. R. Wilson, W. A. Richards, “Mechanisms of contour curvature discrimination,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 6, 106–115 (1989). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. C. Zetzsche, E. Barth, “Fundamental limits of linear filters in the visual processing of two-dimensional signals,” Vision Res. 30, 1111–1117 (1990). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. C. Zetzsche, E. Barth, “Image surface predicates and the neural encoding of two-dimensional signal variation,” in Human Vision and Electronic Imaging: Models, Methods, and Applications, B. Rogowitz, ed., Proc. SPIE1249, 160–177 (1990).
  28. F. Heitger, L. Rosenthaler, R. von der Heydt, E. Peterhans, O. Kübler, “Simulation of neural contour mechanisms: from simple to end-stopped cells,” Vision Res. 32, 63–981 (1992). [CrossRef]
  29. C. Zetzsche, E. Barth, “Detection of intrinsic signal dimensionality in images and optic flow fields,” Perception 20, 71 (1991).
  30. C. Zetzsche, E. Barth, B. Wegmann, “The importance of intrinsically two-dimensional image features in biological vision and picture coding,” in Digital Images and Human Vision, A. Watson, ed. (MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass., 1993), pp. 109–138.
  31. E. Barth, T. Caelli, C. Zetzsche, “Image encoding, labelling and reconstruction from differential geometry,” CVGIP: Graph. Models Image Process. 55, 428–446 (1993).
  32. G. Krieger, C. Zetzsche, E. Barth, “2D-detectors in biological vision: Volterra–Wiener kernels for end-stopped, dot-responsive, and motion-specific cells,” Perception 22 (Suppl.), 143 (1993).
  33. G. Krieger, C. Zetzsche, E. Barth, “Nonlinear image operators for the detection of local intrinsic dimensionality,” in Proceedings of the IEEE Workshop Nonlinear Signal and Image Processing (Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Piscataway, N.J., 1995), pp. 182–185.
  34. G. Krieger, C. Zetzsche, “Nonlinear image operators for the evaluation of local intrinsic dimensionality,” Special issue on Nonlinear Image Processing, IEEE Trans. Image Process. 5, 1026–1042 (1996). [CrossRef]
  35. T. M. Caelli, M. Hübner, I. Rentschler, “On the discrimination of micropatterns and textures,” Hum. Neurobiol. 5, 129–136 (1986). [PubMed]
  36. A. Papoulis, The Fourier Integral and its Applications (McGraw-Hill, New York, 1962).
  37. B. Julesz, “Experiments in the visual perception of texture,” Sci. Am. 232, 34–43 (1975). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. J. A. Solomon, A. B. Watson, “Cinematica: a system for calibrated, Macintosh-driven displays from within Mathematica,” Behav. Res. Methods Instrum. Comput. 28, 607–610 (1996). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. I. Rentschler, B. Treutwein, “Loss of spatial phase relationships in extrafoveal vision,” Nature 313, 308–310 (1985). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  40. I. Rentschler, M. Huebner, T. Caelli, “On the discrimination of compound Gabor signals and textures,” Vision Res. 28, 279–291 (1988). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  41. S. A. Klein, C. W. Tyler, “Phase discrimination of compound gratings: generalized autocorrelation analysis,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 3, 868–879 (1986). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. C. Zetzsche, B. Wegmann, “Coding properties of local amplitude and phase of two-dimensional filter outputs,” Perception 17, 396 (1988).
  43. T. M. Caelli, B. Julesz, E. Gilbert, “On perceptual analysers underlying visual texture discrimination. Part II,” Biol. Cybern. 29, 201–214 (1978). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. D. S. Simmons, D. H. Foster, “Segmenting textures of curved-line elements,” in Artificial and Biological Vision Systems, G. A. Orban, H.-H. Nagel, eds. (Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1992), pp. 324–349.
  45. B. S. Rubenstein, D. Sagi, “Preattentive texture segmentation: the role of line terminations, size, and filter wavelength,” Percept. Psychophys. 58, 489–509 (1996). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. E. Barth, G. Krieger, I. Rentschler, B. Treutwein, “Receptor-horizontal cell interactions may induce endstopping,” Invest. Ophthalmol. Visual Sci. 37 (Suppl.), 1056 (1996).
  47. E. Barth, C. Zetzsche, “Endstopped operators based on iterated nonlinear center-surround inhibition,” in Human Vision and Electronic Imaging III, B. Rogowitz, ed., Proc. SPIE3299, pp. 41–53 (1998).
  48. E. Barth, M. Ferraro, C. Zetzsche, I. Rentschler, “Computational models for the topological selectivity in early and primitive vision systems,” OSA Annual Meeting, Vol. 16 of 1993 OSA Technical Digest Series (Optical Society of America, Washington, D.C., 1993), p. 186.
  49. K. Koffka, Principles of Gestalt Psychology (Harcourt, Brace, New York, 1935).
  50. B. Julesz, “Spatial nonlinearities in the instantaneous perception of textures with identical power spectra,” Philos. Trans. R. Soc. London Ser. B 290, 83–94 (1980). [CrossRef]
  51. J. Elder, S. Zucker, “The effect of contour closure on the rapid discrimination of two-dimensional shapes,” Vision Res. 33, 981–991 (1993). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  52. J. Elder, S. Zucker, “A measure of closure,” Vision Res. 34, 3361–3369 (1994). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. E. Barth, C. Zetzsche, I. Rentschler, “End-stopping may yield textons,” Perception 24 (Suppl.), 19 (1995).

Cited By

Alert me when this paper is cited

OSA is able to provide readers links to articles that cite this paper by participating in CrossRef's Cited-By Linking service. CrossRef includes content from more than 3000 publishers and societies. In addition to listing OSA journal articles that cite this paper, citing articles from other participating publishers will also be listed.


Next Article »

OSA is a member of CrossRef.

CrossCheck Deposited