OSA's Digital Library

Journal of the Optical Society of America A

Journal of the Optical Society of America A


  • Vol. 15, Iss. 7 — Jul. 1, 1998
  • pp: 1756–1766

Color-luminance interaction: data produced by oblique cross masking

Ram L. Pandey Vimal  »View Author Affiliations

JOSA A, Vol. 15, Issue 7, pp. 1756-1766 (1998)

View Full Text Article

Acrobat PDF (274 KB)

Browse Journals / Lookup Meetings

Browse by Journal and Year


Lookup Conference Papers

Close Browse Journals / Lookup Meetings

Article Tools



Threshold-elevation (TE-) versus-mask-spatial-frequency (SF) curves and TE-versus-mask-contrast curves, produced by the oblique-masking technique, were reported for uncrossed stimuli (color-test-on-color-mask and luminance-test-on-luminance-mask) [Invest. Ophthalmol. Visual Sci. Suppl. 34, 751 (1993) and Vision. Res. 23, 873 (1983)]. The technique minimizes the artifacts that are due to spatial phase effects, spatial beats, spatial probability summation, and local cues. My goal was to measure these curves for crossed stimuli (color-test-on-luminance-mask and luminance-test-on-color-mask) by this oblique-masking technique and to compare the curves with those reported in previous studies. For this purpose threshold contrasts were measured by a yes–no procedure with randomized double staircases. Test targets were vertical spatially localized (D6) patterns, and masks were oblique sinusoidal patterns; both the test and the mask were presented simultaneously, for 2 s (Gaussian window), on a color monitor interfaced with an ATVista system and a Powell achromatizing lens. The test SF’s were 0.125, 0.5, 2, 4, and 8 cycles per degree (cpd); mask SF’s were 0.031–16 cpd; and mask contrasts were 6.25%–50%. Furthermore, the Red–Green channel was defined by the minimum flicker and the hue cancellation techniques. Results show mostly masking effect (TE>1) at contrasts above threshold; sometimes, separability (TE=1) and above-threshold facilitation (TE<1) effects were also observed, depending on the test SF, the mask SF, the mask contrast, and the subject. In general, the magnitudes of TE’s are smaller and the TE-versus-mask-SF curves are slightly narrower for the oblique-cross-masking conditions than those for the respective oblique uncross masking. In addition, the TE-versus-mask-contrast curves for the crossed conditions are mostly shallower than those for the respective uncrossed conditions. Furthermore, mostly the color–luminance asymmetry (color masks luminance more than luminance masks color) is found, in mild form, for SF’s≥0.5 cpd. For the lower SF of 0.125 cpd, there is either a lack of asymmetry or a very mild asymmetry of the opposite kind (luminance masks color slightly more than color masks luminance) seems to prevail. In general, the oblique-masking data shows mild asymmetry and reduced facilitation; both are consistent with reduced local cues, similar to those shown by randomized phase data, thus making the data suitable for SF analysis; moreover, at high contrast, the masking data are consistent with those reported in previous studies.

© 1998 Optical Society of America

OCIS Codes
(330.1720) Vision, color, and visual optics : Color vision
(330.1800) Vision, color, and visual optics : Vision - contrast sensitivity
(330.1880) Vision, color, and visual optics : Detection
(330.5510) Vision, color, and visual optics : Psychophysics
(330.6100) Vision, color, and visual optics : Spatial discrimination

Ram L. Pandey Vimal, "Color-luminance interaction: data produced by oblique cross masking," J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 15, 1756-1766 (1998)

Sort:  Author  |  Year  |  Journal  |  Reset


  1. R. L. P. Vimal, “Orientation tuning of the spatial-frequency-tuned mechanisms of the Red–Green channel,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 14, 2622–2632 (1997).
  2. M. A. Losada and K. T. Mullen, “The spatial tuning of chromatic mechanisms identified by simultaneous masking,” Vision Res. 34, 331–334 (1994).
  3. E. Switkes, A. Bradley, and K. K. De Valois, “Contrast dependence and mechanisms of masking interactions among chromatic and luminance gratings,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 5, 1149–1162 (1988).
  4. H. R. Wilson, D. K. McFarlane, and G. C. Phillips, “Spatial frequency tuning of orientation selective units estimated by oblique masking,” Vision Res. 23, 873–882 (1983); G. C. Phillips and H. R. Wilson, “Orientation bandwidths of spatial mechanisms measured by masking,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 1, 226–232 (1984).
  5. K. T. Mullen and M. A. Losada, “Evidence for separate pathways for color and luminance detection mechanisms,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 11, 3136–3151 (1994).
  6. R. Pandey and R. L. P. Vimal, “Threshold elevation curves for the Red–Green channel estimated by oblique masking,” Invest. Ophthalmol. Visual Sci. Suppl. 34, 751 (1993).
  7. R. L. P. Vimal, “Spatial-frequency tuning of sustained nonoriented units of the Red–Green channel,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 15, 1–15 (1998).
  8. K. T. Mullen, “The contrast sensitivity of human colour vision to red/green and blue/yellow chromatic gratings,” J. Physiol. (London) 359, 381–400 (1985).
  9. A. Bradley, E. Switkes, and K. K. De Valois, “Orientation and spatial frequency selectivity of adaptation to color and luminance gratings,” Vision Res. 28, 841–856 (1988).
  10. I. Powell, “Lenses for correcting chromatic aberration of the eye,” Appl. Opt. 20, 4152–4155 (1981).
  11. R. L. P. Vimal and R. Pandey, “Interaction between the spatial frequency tuned mechanisms of the Red–Green channel and those of the achromatic channel,” Invest. Ophthalmol. Visual Sci. Suppl. 35, 1370 (1994).
  12. M. Gur and V. Akri, “Isoluminant stimuli may not expose the full contribution of color to visual functioning: spatial contrast sensitivity measurements indicate interaction between color and luminance processing,” Vision Res. 32, 1253–1262 (1992).
  13. D. Jameson and L. M. Hurvich, “Some quantitative aspects of an opponent-color theory. I. Chromatic responses and spectral saturation,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. 45, 546–552 (1955).
  14. For the color vision tests of the observers RV and RP see R. L. P. Vimal, J. M. Pokorny, V. C. Smith, and S. K. Shevell, “Foveal cone thresholds,” Vision Res. 29, 61–78 (1989). For the projective transformation to estimate Judd (x, y) from CIE (x, y) see J. J. Vos, “Colorimetric and photometric properties of a 2° fundamental observer,” Color Res. Appl. 3, 125–128 (1978). For the calculation of tristimulus values from (x, y) coordinates see G. Wyszecki and W. S. Stiles, Color Science: Concepts and Methods, Quantitative Data and Formulae, 2nd ed. (Wiley, New York, 1982), p. 139; for CIE chromaticity diagram see p. 176. For Smith–Pokorny fundamentals see V. C. Smith and J. M. Pokorny, “Spectral sensitivity of the foveal cones between 400 and 500 nm,” Vision Res. VISRAM 15, 161–171 (1975); D. I. A. MacLeod and R. M. Boynton, “Chromaticity diagram showing excitation by stimuli of equal luminance,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. JOSAAH 69, 1183–1186 (1979). For contrasts see P. Lennie and M. D’Zmura, “Mechanisms of color vision,” CRC Crit. Rev. Neurobiol. CCNBE8 3, 333–400 (1988).
  15. T. N. Cornsweet, “The staircase method in psychophysics,” Am. J. Psychol. 75, 485–491 (1962).
  16. J. Krauskopf, D. R. Williams, and D. W. Heeley, “Cardinal directions of colour space,” Vision Res. 22, 1123–1131 (1982).
  17. G. R. Cole, C. F. Stromeyer, and R. E. Kronauer, “Visual interactions with luminance and chromatic stimuli,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 7, 128–140 (1990); G. R. Cole, T. R. Hine, and W. H. McIlhagga, “Estimation of linear detection mechanisms for stimuli of medium spatial frequency,” Vision Res. 34, 1267–1278 (1994).
  18. A. Chaparro, C. F. Stromeyer, R. E. Kronauer, and R. T. Eskew, Jr., “Separable Red–Green and luminance detectors for small flashes,” Vision Res. 34, 751–762 (1994).
  19. K. T. Mullen, S. J. Cropper, and M. A. Losada, “Absence of linear subthreshold summation between Red–Green and luminance mechanisms over a wide range of spatio-temporal conditions,” Vision Res. 37, 1157–1165 (1997).
  20. R. T. Eskew, C. F. Stromeyer, C. J. Picotte, and R. E. Kronauer, “Detection uncertainty and the facilitation of chro-matic detection by luminance contours,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 8, 394–403 (1991).
  21. C. F. Stromeyer, R. E. Kronauer, A. Ryu, A. Chaparro, and R. T. Eskew, “Contribution of human long-wave and middle-wave cones to motion detection,” J. Physiol. (London) 485, 221–243 (1995).
  22. J. Nachmias, “Masked detection of gratings: the standard model revisited,” Vision Res. 33, 1359–1365 (1993).
  23. P. H. Schiller and C. L. Colby, “The responses of single cells in the lateral geniculate nucleus of the rhesus monkey to color and luminance contrast,” Vision Res. 23, 1631–1641 (1983).
  24. J. Ross, H. R. Speed, and M. J. Morgan, “The effects of adaptation and masking on incremental threshold for contrast,” Vision Res. 33, 2051–2056 (1993) and references therein.
  25. J. M. Foley, “Human luminance pattern-vision mechanisms: masking experiments require a new model,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 11, 1710–1719 (1994); D. J. Heeger, “Normalization of cell responses in cat visual cortex,” Visual Neurosci. 9, 181–197 (1992) and references therein.
  26. K. R. Gegenfurtner and D. C. Kiper, “Contrast detection in luminance and chromatic noise,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 9, 1880–1888 (1992).
  27. M. A. Webster and J. D. Mollon, “The influence of contrast adaptation on color appearance,” Vision Res. 34, 1993–2020 (1994); J. Krauskopf, H. J. Wu, and B. Farell, “Coherence, cardinal directions and higher-order mechanisms,” Vision Res. 36, 1235–1245 (1996) and references therein.
  28. M. J. Sankeralli and K. T. Mullen, “Postreceptoral chromatic detection mechanisms revealed by noise masking in three-dimensional cone contrast space,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 14, 2633–2646 (1997).
  29. P. Lennie, J. Krauskopf, and G. Sclar, “Chromatic mechanisms in striate cortex of macaque,” J. Neurosci. 10, 649–669 (1990) and references therein; L. G. Thorell, R. L. De Valois, and D. G. Albrecht, “Spatial mapping of monkey V1 cells with pure color and luminance stimuli,” Vision Res. 24, 751–769 (1984).

Cited By

Alert me when this paper is cited

OSA is able to provide readers links to articles that cite this paper by participating in CrossRef's Cited-By Linking service. CrossRef includes content from more than 3000 publishers and societies. In addition to listing OSA journal articles that cite this paper, citing articles from other participating publishers will also be listed.

« Previous Article  |  Next Article »

OSA is a member of CrossRef.

CrossCheck Deposited