OSA's Digital Library

Journal of the Optical Society of America A

Journal of the Optical Society of America A

| OPTICS, IMAGE SCIENCE, AND VISION

  • Vol. 15, Iss. 8 — Aug. 1, 1998
  • pp: 2228–2232

Analytic methods in the determination of optical properties by spectral ellipsometry

David U. Fluckiger  »View Author Affiliations


JOSA A, Vol. 15, Issue 8, pp. 2228-2232 (1998)
http://dx.doi.org/10.1364/JOSAA.15.002228


View Full Text Article

Enhanced HTML    Acrobat PDF (3931 KB)





Browse Journals / Lookup Meetings

Browse by Journal and Year


   


Lookup Conference Papers

Close Browse Journals / Lookup Meetings

Article Tools

Share
Citations

Abstract

Optical properties of bulk materials and thin films have long been determined by spectral ellipsometers (SE’s). Optical properties are determined by finding the global minimum of a merit function χ2. Even in the simplest cases χ2 is dependent on at least five parameters. The global minimization of χ2 benefits from careful selection of the SE instrument state such that χ2 is optimally smooth in some sense. Minimization methods that assume analyticity, such as the popular Levenberg–Marquardt algorithm, encounter problems as the number of nondifferentiable points in χ2 increases. The purpose of the paper is to examine the distribution of local minimum and discontinuities in χ2 as a function of incident angle and wavelength-range selection. With proper attention to the selection of the incident angle and wavelength range the robustness of the Levenberg–Marquardt algorithm may be extended in fixed-angle SE’s.

© 1998 Optical Society of America

OCIS Codes
(120.2130) Instrumentation, measurement, and metrology : Ellipsometry and polarimetry
(310.1860) Thin films : Deposition and fabrication

History
Original Manuscript: January 5, 1998
Revised Manuscript: March 23, 1998
Manuscript Accepted: April 2, 1998
Published: August 1, 1998

Citation
David U. Fluckiger, "Analytic methods in the determination of optical properties by spectral ellipsometry," J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 15, 2228-2232 (1998)
http://www.opticsinfobase.org/josaa/abstract.cfm?URI=josaa-15-8-2228


Sort:  Author  |  Year  |  Journal  |  Reset  

References

  1. R. M. A. Azzam, N. M. Bashara, Ellipsometry and Polarized Light (North-Holland, New York, 1996).
  2. D. P. Arndt, R. M. A. Azzam, J. M. Bennett, J. P. Borgogno, C. K. Carniglia, W. E. Case, J. A. Dobrowolski, U. J. Gibson, T. T. Hart, F. C. Ho, V. A. Hodgkin, W. P. Klapp, H. A. Macleod, E. Pelletier, M. K. Purvis, D. M. Quinn, D. H. Strome, R. Swenson, P. A. Temple, T. F. Thonn, “Multiple determination of the optical constants of thin-film coating materials,” Appl. Opt. 23, 3571–3596 (1984). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. J. P. Drolet, S. C. Russev, M. I. Boyanov, R. M. Leblanc, “Polynomial inversion of the single transparent layer problem in ellipsometry,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 11, 3284–3291 (1994). [CrossRef]
  4. W. H. Press, B. P. Flannery, S. A. Teukolsky, W. T. Vetterling, Numerical Recipes in C (Cambridge U. Press, New York, 1991).
  5. G. E. Jellison, “The use of the biased estimator in the interpretation of spectroscopic ellipsometry data,” Appl. Opt. 30, 3354–3360 (1991). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. C. M. Herzinger, H. Yao, P. G. Snyder, “Determination of AlAs optical constants by variable angle spectroscopic ellipsometry and a multisample analysis,” J. Appl. Phys. 77, 4677–4687 (1995). [CrossRef]
  7. A Verity Instruments Series-10 Spectral Ellipsometer was used in obtaining data. The wavelength increment is determined by the spectrograph optics and the grating dispersion, which varies from 9.5 nm at the short-wavelength end to 9.1 nm at the long-wavelength end.
  8. E. D. Palik, ed., Handbook of Optical Constants of Solids, Volume 1 and 2 (Academic, New York, 1991).
  9. K. Price, R. Storn, “Differential evolution—a simple and efficient adaptive scheme for global optimization over continuous spaces,” (International Computer Science Institute, University of California at Berkeley, Berkeley, Calif., 1995) (available through ftp.icsi.berkeley.edu).
  10. R. Storn, K. Price, “Minimizing the real functions of the ICEC’96 contest by differential evolution,” in Proceedings of the 1996 IEEE Conference on Evolutionary Computation (ICEC ’96) (Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, New York, 1996), pp. 842–844.

Cited By

Alert me when this paper is cited

OSA is able to provide readers links to articles that cite this paper by participating in CrossRef's Cited-By Linking service. CrossRef includes content from more than 3000 publishers and societies. In addition to listing OSA journal articles that cite this paper, citing articles from other participating publishers will also be listed.


« Previous Article  |  Next Article »

OSA is a member of CrossRef.

CrossCheck Deposited