OSA's Digital Library

Journal of the Optical Society of America A

Journal of the Optical Society of America A

| OPTICS, IMAGE SCIENCE, AND VISION

  • Vol. 15, Iss. 9 — Sep. 1, 1998
  • pp: 2312–2326

Unified reconstruction theory for diffraction tomography, with consideration of noise control

Xiaochuan Pan  »View Author Affiliations


JOSA A, Vol. 15, Issue 9, pp. 2312-2326 (1998)
http://dx.doi.org/10.1364/JOSAA.15.002312


View Full Text Article

Acrobat PDF (413 KB)





Browse Journals / Lookup Meetings

Browse by Journal and Year


   


Lookup Conference Papers

Close Browse Journals / Lookup Meetings

Article Tools

Share
Citations

Abstract

In diffraction tomography, the spatial distribution of the scattering object is reconstructed from the measured scattered data. For a scattering object that is illuminated with plane-wave radiation, under the condition of weak scattering one can invoke the Born (or the Rytov) approximation to linearize the equation for the scattered field (or the scattered phase) and derive a relationship between the scattered field (or the scattered phase) and the distribution of the scattering object. Reconstruction methods such as the Fourier domain interpolation methods and the filtered backpropagation method have been developed previously. However, the underlying relationship among and the noise properties of these methods are not evident. We introduce the concepts of ideal and modified sinograms. Analysis of the relationships between, and the noise properties of the two sinograms reveals infinite classes of methods for image reconstruction in diffraction tomography that include the previously proposed methods as special members. The methods in these classes are mathematically identical, but they respond to noise and numerical errors differently.

© 1998 Optical Society of America

OCIS Codes
(050.1940) Diffraction and gratings : Diffraction
(100.3010) Image processing : Image reconstruction techniques
(100.3020) Image processing : Image reconstruction-restoration
(100.3190) Image processing : Inverse problems

Citation
Xiaochuan Pan, "Unified reconstruction theory for diffraction tomography, with consideration of noise control," J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 15, 2312-2326 (1998)
http://www.opticsinfobase.org/josaa/abstract.cfm?URI=josaa-15-9-2312


Sort:  Author  |  Year  |  Journal  |  Reset

References

  1. R. K. Mueller, M. Kaveh, and G. Wade, “Reconstructive tomography and applications to ultrasonics,” Proc. IEEE 67, 567–587 (1979).
  2. R. K. Mueller, M. Kaveh, and R. D. Iverson, “A new approach to acoustic tomography using diffraction techniques,” in Acoustical Holography, vol. 8, A. F. Metherell, ed. (Plenum, New York, 1980), pp. 615–628.
  3. M. Slaney and A. C. Kak, “Diffraction tomography,” in Inverse Optics, Vol. 14, A. J. Devaney, ed. (SPIE, Bellingham, Wash., 1983), pp. 2–19.
  4. C. F. Schueler, H. Lee, and G. Wade, “Fundamentals of digital ultrasonic imaging,” IEEE Trans. Sonics Ultrason. 31, 195–217 (1984).
  5. J. Bolomey, A. Izadnegahdar, L. Jofre, C. Pichot, G. Peronnet, and M. Solaimani, “Microwave diffraction tomography for biomedical applications,” IEEE Trans. Microwave Theor. Tech. MTT-30, 1998–2000 (1982).
  6. A. J. Devaney, “Geophysical diffraction tomography,” IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sens. GRS-22, 3–13 (1984).
  7. R. S. Wu and M. N. Toksöz, “Diffraction tomography and multisource holography applied to seismic imaging,” Geophysics 52, 11–25 (1987).
  8. B. Duchêne, D. Lesselier, and W. Tabbara, “Experimental investigation of a diffraction tomography technique in fluid ultrasonics,” IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. 35, 437–444 (1988).
  9. L.-J. Gelius, I. Johansen, N. Sponheim, and J. J. Stamnes, “Diffraction tomography applications in medicine and seismics,” in Proceedings of NATO Advanced Workshop on Inverse Problems in Scattering and Imaging (Bristol, Philadelphia, 1992).
  10. J. F. Greenleaf, “3D and tomographic ultrasound,” Medical CT and Ultrasound: Current Technology and Applications, L. W. Goldman and J. B. Fowlkes, ed. (American Association of Physicists in Medicine, College Park, Md., 1995), pp. 267–284.
  11. T. A. Dickens and G. A. Winbow, “Spatial resolution of diffraction tomography,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 101, 77–86 (1997).
  12. H. S. Janée, J. P. Jones, and M. P. André, “Analysis of scatter fields in diffraction tomography experiments,” Acoust. Imaging 22, 21–26 (1996).
  13. M. P. André, H. S. Janée, G. P. Otto, P. J. Martin, and J. P. Jones, “Reduction of phase aberration in a diffraction tomography system for breast imaging,” Acoust. Imaging 22, 151–157 (1996).
  14. E. Wolf, “Three-dimensional structure determination of semi-transparent objects from holographic data,” Opt. Commun. 1, 153–156 (1969).
  15. H. H. Barrett, “The Radon transform and its applications,” in Progress in Optics, E. Wolf, ed. (Elsevier, N.Y., 1984), vol. XXI, pp. 219–286.
  16. F. Natterer, The Mathematics of Computerized Tomography (Wiley, New York, 1986).
  17. L. A. Chernov, Wave Propagation in a Random Medium (McGraw-Hill, New York, 1969).
  18. K. Iwata and R. Nagata, “Calculation of three-dimensional refractive index distribution from interferograms,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. 60, 133–135 (1970).
  19. K. T. Ladas and A. J. Devaney, “Generalized ART algorithm for diffraction tomography,” Inverse Probl. 7, 109–125 (1991).
  20. D. T. Borup, S. A. Johnson, W. W. Kim, and M. J. Berggren, “Nonperturbative diffraction tomography via Gauss–Newton iteration applied to the scattering integral equation,” Ultrason. Imaging 14, 69–85 (1992).
  21. F. Natterer and F. Wübbeling, “A propagation-backpropagation method for ultrasound tomography,” Inverse Probl. 11, 1225–1232 (1995).
  22. A. Ishimaru, Wave Propagation and Scattering in Random Medium Vol. 2 (Academic, New York, 1978).
  23. K. Iwata and R. Nagata, “Calculation of three-dimensional refractive index distribution from interferograms using Born and Rytov’s approximation,” Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. 14, Suppl. 14–1, 383 (1975).
  24. S. X. Pan and A. C. Kak, “A computational study of reconstruction algorithms for diffraction tomography: interpolation versus filtered backpropagation,” IEEE Trans. Acoust., Speech, Signal Process. 31, 1262–1275 (1983).
  25. A. J. Devaney, “A filtered backpropagation algorithm for diffraction images,” Ultrason. Imaging 4, 336–350 (1982).
  26. D. Rouseff and R. P. Porter, “Diffraction tomography and the stochastic inverse scattering problem,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 89, 1599–1605 (1991).
  27. G. A. Tsihrintzis and A. J. Devaney, “Application of a maximum likelihood estimator in an experimental study in ultrasonic diffraction tomography,” IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging 12, 545–554 (1993).
  28. G. A. Tsihrintzis and A. J. Devaney, “Stochastic diffraction tomography: theory and computer simulation,” Signal Process. 30, 49–64 (1993).
  29. D. G. Fischer and E. Wolf, “Theory of diffraction tomography for quasi-homogeneous random objects,” Opt. Commun. 133, 17–21 (1997).
  30. T. F. Budinger, G. T. Gullberg, and R. H. Huesman, “Emission computed tomography,” in Topics in Applied Physics: Image Reconstruction from Projections, G. T. Herman, ed. (Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1979), pp. 147–246.
  31. R. J. Jaszczak, R. E. Coleman, C. B. Lim, and F. R. Whitehead, “Physical factors affecting quantitative measurements using camera-based single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT),” IEEE Trans. Nucl. Sci. 28, 69–80 (1981).
  32. O. J. Tretiak and C. E. Metz, “The exponential Radon transform,” SIAM J. Appl. Math. 39, 341–354 (1980).
  33. G. T. Gullberg and T. F. Budinger, “The use of filtering methods to compensate for constant attenuation in single-photon emission computed tomography,” IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. 8, 142–157 (1981).
  34. C. E. Metz and X. Pan, “A unified analysis of exact methods of inverting the 2D exponential Radon transform, with implications for noise control in SPECT,” IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging 14, 643–658 (1995).
  35. X. Pan and C. E. Metz, “Analysis of noise properties of a class of exact methods of inverting the 2D exponential Radon transform,” IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging 14, 659–668 (1995).
  36. S. R. Dean, The Radon Transform and Some of Its Applications (Wiley, New York, 1983).
  37. A. Papoulis, Probability, Random Variables, and Stochastic Processes (McGraw-Hill, New York, 1991).
  38. M. L. Boas, Mathematical Methods in the Physical Sciences (Wiley, New York, 1983).
  39. M. Anastasio, M. Kupinski, and X. Pan, “Noise properties ofreconstructed images in ultrasound diffraction tomogra- phy,” in IEEE 1997 Nuclear Science Symposium and Medical Imaging Conference Record (Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Piscataway, N.J., 1997), vol. 2, pp. 1561–1565.
  40. Z. Lu and Y. Zhang, “Acoustical tomography based on the second-order Born transform perturbation approximation,” IEEE Trans. Ultrason. Ferroelectr. Freq. Control 43, 296–302 (1996).
  41. A. J. Devaney, “Generalized projection-slice theorem for fan-beam diffraction tomography,” Ultrason. Imaging 7, 264–275 (1985).

Cited By

Alert me when this paper is cited

OSA is able to provide readers links to articles that cite this paper by participating in CrossRef's Cited-By Linking service. CrossRef includes content from more than 3000 publishers and societies. In addition to listing OSA journal articles that cite this paper, citing articles from other participating publishers will also be listed.


« Previous Article  |  Next Article »

OSA is a member of CrossRef.

CrossCheck Deposited