OSA's Digital Library

Journal of the Optical Society of America A

Journal of the Optical Society of America A

| OPTICS, IMAGE SCIENCE, AND VISION

  • Vol. 15, Iss. 9 — Sep. 1, 1998
  • pp: 2536–2544

Predicting the effects of optical defocus on human contrast sensitivity

David A. Atchison, Russell L. Woods, and Arthur Bradley  »View Author Affiliations


JOSA A, Vol. 15, Issue 9, pp. 2536-2544 (1998)
http://dx.doi.org/10.1364/JOSAA.15.002536


View Full Text Article

Acrobat PDF (279 KB)





Browse Journals / Lookup Meetings

Browse by Journal and Year


   


Lookup Conference Papers

Close Browse Journals / Lookup Meetings

Article Tools

Share
Citations

Abstract

We used diffraction modulation transfer functions and model eyes to predict the effect of defocus on the contrast sensitivity function (CSF) and compared these predictions with previously published experimental data. Using the principle that optically induced changes in the modulation transfer function should be paralleled by identical changes in the CSF, we used the modulation transfer function calculations with the best-focus CSF measurements to predict the defocused CSF. An aberration-free model predicted the effects of defocus well when the CSF was measured with small pupils (e.g., 2 mm) but not with larger pupils (6–8 mm). When the model included average aberrations, prediction of the defocused CSF with large pupils was better but remained inaccurate, failing, in particular, to reflect differences between individual subjects. Inclusion of measured aberrations for individual subjects provided accurate predictions in the shape of the monochromatic CSF of two of three subjects with hyperopic defocus and good predictions of the polychromatic CSF of two subjects with hyperopic defocus. Prediction of the effects of myopic defocus by use of measured individual aberrations of one subject were less successful. Hence a diffraction optics model can provide good predictions of the effects of defocus on the human CSF, given that one has knowledge of the individual ocular aberrations. These predictions are dependent on the quality of the aberration measurements.

© 1998 Optical Society of America

OCIS Codes
(110.3000) Imaging systems : Image quality assessment
(110.4100) Imaging systems : Modulation transfer function
(220.1000) Optical design and fabrication : Aberration compensation
(330.1800) Vision, color, and visual optics : Vision - contrast sensitivity

Citation
David A. Atchison, Russell L. Woods, and Arthur Bradley, "Predicting the effects of optical defocus on human contrast sensitivity," J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 15, 2536-2544 (1998)
http://www.opticsinfobase.org/josaa/abstract.cfm?URI=josaa-15-9-2536


Sort:  Author  |  Year  |  Journal  |  Reset

References

  1. H. H. Hopkins, “The frequency response of a defocused optical system,” Proc. Phys. Soc. London Sect. A 231, 91–103 (1955).
  2. D. G. Green and F. W. Campbell, “Effect of focus on the visual response to a sinusoidally modulated spatial stimulus,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. 55, 1154–1157 (1965).
  3. F. W. Campbell and D. G. Green, “Optical factors affecting visual resolution,” J. Physiol. (London) 181, 576–593 (1966).
  4. W. N. Charman, “Effect of refractive error in visual tests with sinusoidal gratings,” Br. J. Physiol. Opt. 33, 10–20 (1979).
  5. D. A. Atchison, “Visual optics in man,” Aust. J. Optom. 67, 141–150 (1984).
  6. C. D. Kay and J. D. Morrison, “A quantitative investigation into the effects of pupil diameter and defocus on contrast sensitivity for an extended range of spatial frequencies in natural and homatropinized eyes,” Ophthalmic Physiol. Opt. 7, 21–30 (1987).
  7. R. L. Woods, A. Bradley, and D. A. Atchison, “Consequences of monocular diplopia for the contrast sensitivity function,” Vision Res. 36, 3587–3596 (1996).
  8. R. L. Woods, A. Bradley, and D. A. Atchison, “Monocular diplopia caused by aberrations and defocus,” Vision Res. 36, 3597–3606 (1996).
  9. M. C. W. Campbell, E. M. Harrison, and P. Simonet, “Psychophysical measurement of the blur on the retina due to optical aberrations of the eye,” Vision Res. 30, 1587–1602 (1990).
  10. M. Koomen, R. Tousey, and R. Scolnik, “The spherical aberration of the eye,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. 39, 370–376 (1949).
  11. A. Ivanoff, “About the spherical aberration of the eye,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. 46, 901–903 (1956).
  12. T. C. A. Jenkins, “Aberrations of the human eye and their effects on vision. Part 1,” Br. J. Physiol. Opt. 20, 59–91 (1963).
  13. F. W. Campbell and R. W. Gubisch, “Optical quality of the human eye,” J. Physiol. (London) 186, 558–578 (1966).
  14. H. C. Howland and B. Howland, “A subjective method for the measurement of monochromatic aberrations of the eye,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. 67, 1508–1518 (1977).
  15. G. Walsh and W. N. Charman, “Measurement of the axial wavefront aberration of the human eye,” Ophthalmic Physiol. Opt. 5, 23–31 (1985).
  16. J. Liang, B. Grimm, S. Goelz, and J. F. Bille, “Objective measurement of wave aberrations of the human eye with the use of a Hartmann–Shack wave-front sensor,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 11, 1949–1957 (1994).
  17. D. A. Atchison, M. J. Collins, C. F. Wildsoet, J. Christensen, and M. D. Waterworth, “Measurement of monochromatic ocular aberrations of human eyes as a function of accommodation by the Howland aberroscope technique,” Vision Res. 35, 313–323 (1995).
  18. M. J. Collins, C. F. Wildsoet, and D. A. Atchison, “Monochromatic aberrations and myopia,” Vision Res. 35, 1157–1163 (1995).
  19. J. Liang and D. R. Williams, “Aberrations and retinal image quality of the normal human eye,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 14, 2873–2883 (1997).
  20. R. A. Applegate and V. Lakshminarayanan, “Parametric representation of Stiles–Crawford functions: normal variation of peak location and directionality,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 10, 1611–1623 (1993).
  21. L. J. Bour and P. Apkarian, “Segmented refraction of the crystalline lens as a prerequisite for the occurrence of monocular polyplopia, increased depth of focus, and contrast sensitivity function notches,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 11, 2769–2776 (1994).
  22. L. J. Bour and P. Apkarian, “Selective broad-band spatial frequency loss in contrast sensitivity functions,” Invest. Ophthalmol. Visual Sci. 37, 2475–2484 (1996).
  23. G. E. Legge, K. T. Mullen, G. C. Woo, and F. W. Campbell, “Tolerance to visual defocus,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 5, 851–863 (1987).
  24. G. Smith and D. A. Atchison, The Eye and Visual Optical Instruments (Cambridge U. Press, New York, 1997), pp. 675–677.
  25. J. Macdonald, “The calculation of the optical transfer function,” Opt. Acta 18, 269–290 (1971).
  26. W. S. Stiles and B. H. Crawford, “The luminous efficiency of rays entering the light pupil at different points,” Proc. R. Soc. London Ser. B 112, 428–450 (1933).
  27. J. E. Birren, R. C. Casperson, and J. Botwinick, “Age changes in pupil size,” J. Gerontol. 5, 216–224 (1950).
  28. S. G. De Groot and J. W. Gebhard, “Pupil size as determined by adapting luminance,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. 42, 492–495 (1952).
  29. R. Leinhos, “Die Alterabhängigkeit des Augenpupillendurchmessers,” Optik 16, 669–671 (1959).
  30. A. van Meeteren, “Calculations on the optical modulation transfer function of the human eye for white light,” Opt. Acta 21, 395–412 (1974).
  31. L. N. Thibos, M. Ye, X. Zhang, and A. Bradley, “The chromatic eye: a new reduced-eye model of ocular chromatic aberration in humans,” Appl. Opt. 31, 3594–3600 (1992).
  32. L. N. Thibos, A. Bradley, D. L. Still, X. Zhang, and P. A. Howarth, “Theory and measurement of ocular chromatic aberration,” Vision Res. 30, 33–49 (1990).
  33. R. L. Woods, “Reliability of visual performance measurement under optical degradation,” Ophthalmic Physiol. Opt. 13, 143–150 (1993).
  34. G. Smith, “Ocular defocus, spurious resolution and contrast reversal,” Ophthalmic Physiol. Opt. 2, 5–23 (1982).
  35. P. Apkarian, R. Tijssen, H. Spekreijse, and D. Regan, “Origin of notches in CSF: optical or neural?” Invest. Ophthalmol. Visual Sci. 28, 607–612 (1987).
  36. D. A. Atchison, R. L. Woods, and A. Bradley, “Predicting variations in visual performance caused by optical defects,” in Vision Science and Its Applications, Vol. 1 of 1996 OSA Technical Digest Series (Optical Society of America, Washington, D.C., 1996), pp. 226–229.

Cited By

Alert me when this paper is cited

OSA is able to provide readers links to articles that cite this paper by participating in CrossRef's Cited-By Linking service. CrossRef includes content from more than 3000 publishers and societies. In addition to listing OSA journal articles that cite this paper, citing articles from other participating publishers will also be listed.


« Previous Article  |  Next Article »

OSA is a member of CrossRef.

CrossCheck Deposited