OSA's Digital Library

Journal of the Optical Society of America A

Journal of the Optical Society of America A

| OPTICS, IMAGE SCIENCE, AND VISION

  • Vol. 16, Iss. 1 — Jan. 1, 1999
  • pp: 176–187

Issues related to the use of a Gaussian-like incident field for low-grazing-angle scattering

Jakov V. Toporkov, Ra’id S. Awadallah, and Gary S. Brown  »View Author Affiliations


JOSA A, Vol. 16, Issue 1, pp. 176-187 (1999)
http://dx.doi.org/10.1364/JOSAA.16.000176


View Full Text Article

Enhanced HTML    Acrobat PDF (359 KB)





Browse Journals / Lookup Meetings

Browse by Journal and Year


   


Lookup Conference Papers

Close Browse Journals / Lookup Meetings

Article Tools

Share
Citations

Abstract

We study the suitability of a tapered plane-wave incident field, using both the Gaussian and the more advanced Thorsos tapers for low-grazing-angle rough-surface scattering problems as well as the problem of propagation in the presence of a rough surface. For surface scattering problems it is known that as the angle of incidence approaches grazing incidence the tapered beam waist should be made larger; several criteria relating these two parameters have been proposed for both the Gaussian and the Thorsos tapers. Our two-dimensional scattering simulations with the oceanlike Pierson–Moskowitz surfaces show that when the width of the Gaussian or the Thorsos taper is fixed, the backscatter cross section for TE polarization is characterized by a distinctive and consistent anomalous jump as grazing incidence is approached. This observation has led to a refined version of one of the above-mentioned beam waist–angle of incidence criteria and its robustness is demonstrated. The approximate (non-Maxwellian) nature of the Thorsos–Gaussian taper also becomes evident in over-surface-propagation simulations with use of the boundary integral equation method. A certain inconsistency was observed between the surface field that we obtained by first defining the Thorsos–Gaussian-tapered field on a vertical plane and then propagating it to the surface and that obtained by defining the same tapered field directly on the surface. This effect, not previously appreciated, may be of importance when the rough-surface effects are rigorously incorporated into the propagation problem. We conclude with a detailed derivation of the Thorsos taper that points out all the approximations involved in it and the resulting limitations.

© 1999 Optical Society of America

OCIS Codes
(000.4430) General : Numerical approximation and analysis
(010.1300) Atmospheric and oceanic optics : Atmospheric propagation
(290.5880) Scattering : Scattering, rough surfaces

History
Original Manuscript: February 26, 1998
Revised Manuscript: September 11, 1998
Manuscript Accepted: September 4, 1998
Published: January 1, 1999

Citation
Jakov V. Toporkov, Ra’id S. Awadallah, and Gary S. Brown, "Issues related to the use of a Gaussian-like incident field for low-grazing-angle scattering," J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 16, 176-187 (1999)
http://www.opticsinfobase.org/josaa/abstract.cfm?URI=josaa-16-1-176


Sort:  Author  |  Year  |  Journal  |  Reset  

References

  1. E. Thorsos, “The validity of the Kirchhoff approximation for rough surface scattering using a Gaussian roughness spectrum,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 83, 78–92 (1988). [CrossRef]
  2. R. T. Marchand, G. S. Brown, “On the use of finite surfaces in the numerical prediction of rough surface scattering,” submitted to IEEE Trans. Antennas Propag.
  3. D. A. Kapp, G. S. Brown, “A new numerical method for rough surface scattering calculations,” IEEE Trans. Antennas Propag. 44, 711–721 (1996). [CrossRef]
  4. L. Tsang, C. H. Chan, K. Pak, H. Sangani, “Monte-Carlo simulations of large-scale problems of random rough surface scattering and applications to grazing incidence with the BMIA/canonical grid method,” IEEE Trans. Antennas Propag. 43, 851–859 (1995). [CrossRef]
  5. J. T. Johnson, “A numerical study of low grazing angle backscatter from ocean-like impedance surfaces with the canonical grid method,” IEEE Trans. Antennas Propag. 46, 114–120 (1998). [CrossRef]
  6. R. S. Awadallah, G. S. Brown, “Parabolic equation formulation via a singular perturbation technique and its application to scattering from irregular surfaces,” Waves Random Media 8, 315–328 (1998). [CrossRef]
  7. D. J. Donohue, H.-C. Ku, D. Thompson, “Application of iterative moment-method solutions to ocean surface radar scattering,” IEEE Trans. Antennas Propag. 46, 121–132 (1998). [CrossRef]
  8. R. S. Awadallah, G. S. Brown, “Electromagnetic wave scattering from a rough surface in a surface-based duct created by a linear-square refractive index profile,” in Proceedings of the 1997 Battlespace Atmospherics Conference (Space and Naval Warfare Systems Center, San Diego, Calif., 1998), pp. 519–528.
  9. H. D. Ngo, C. L. Rino, “Application of beam simulation to scattering at low grazing angles. 1. Methodology and validation,” Radio Sci. 29, 1365–1379 (1994). [CrossRef]
  10. D. A. Kapp, “A new method to calculate wave scattering from rough surfaces at low grazing angles,” Ph.D. dissertation (Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Blacksburg, Va., 1995).
  11. R. T. Marchand, “Numerical study on the validity of the quasi-specular and two-scale models for rough surface parameter estimation: one dimensional surfaces,” Ph.D. dissertation (Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Blacksburg, Va., 1996), pp. 87–89.
  12. A. Ishimaru, Electromagnetic Wave Propagation, Radiation and Scattering (Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, N.J.1991), pp. 354–356.
  13. J. V. Toporkov, R. T. Marchand, G. S. Brown, “On the discretization of the integral equation describing scattering by rough conducting surfaces,” IEEE Trans. Antennas Propag. 46, 150–161 (1998). [CrossRef]
  14. E. Thorsos, “Acoustic scattering from ‘Pierson–Moskowitz’ sea surface,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 88, 335–349 (1990). [CrossRef]
  15. F. T. Ulaby, R. K. Moore, A. K. Fung, Microwave Remote Sensing: Active and Passive (Artech House, Norwood, Mass., 1986), Vol. 2, pp. 816–817.
  16. I. S. Gradshteyn, I. M. Ryzhik, Tables of Integrals, Series, and Products (Academic, New York, 1994), pp. 354–355.
  17. J. V. Toporkov, “Study of electromagnetic scattering from randomly rough ocean-like surfaces using integral-equation-based numerical technique,” Ph.D. dissertation (Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Blacksburg, Va., 1998), pp. 123–178.
  18. R. J. Adams, B. A. Davis, G. S. Brown, “Scattering from a closed body above the rough surface using the method of ordered multiple interactions,” presented at the IEEE-APS International Symposium and USNC/URSI National Radio Science Meeting, Atlanta, Ga., June 21–26, 1998.

Cited By

Alert me when this paper is cited

OSA is able to provide readers links to articles that cite this paper by participating in CrossRef's Cited-By Linking service. CrossRef includes content from more than 3000 publishers and societies. In addition to listing OSA journal articles that cite this paper, citing articles from other participating publishers will also be listed.


« Previous Article  |  Next Article »

OSA is a member of CrossRef.

CrossCheck Deposited