OSA's Digital Library

Journal of the Optical Society of America A

Journal of the Optical Society of America A

| OPTICS, IMAGE SCIENCE, AND VISION

  • Vol. 16, Iss. 10 — Oct. 1, 1999
  • pp: 2334–2342

Sampling limits and critical bandwidth for letter discrimination in peripheral vision

Roger S. Anderson and Larry N. Thibos  »View Author Affiliations


JOSA A, Vol. 16, Issue 10, pp. 2334-2342 (1999)
http://dx.doi.org/10.1364/JOSAA.16.002334


View Full Text Article

Enhanced HTML    Acrobat PDF (964 KB)





Browse Journals / Lookup Meetings

Browse by Journal and Year


   


Lookup Conference Papers

Close Browse Journals / Lookup Meetings

Article Tools

Share
Citations

Abstract

We develop and test two functional hypotheses based on the sampling theory of visual resolution that might account for letter acuity in peripheral vision. First, a letter smaller than the acuity limit provides insufficient veridical energy for performing the task, and, second, the available veridical energy is masked by increased amounts of visible but aliased energy. These two hypotheses make opposite predictions about the effect of low-pass filtering on letter acuity, which we tested experimentally by using filtered letters from the tumbling-E alphabet. Our results reject the masking hypothesis in favor of the energy insufficiency hypothesis. Additional experiments in which high-pass-filtered letters were used permitted the isolation of a critical band of spatial frequencies, which is necessary and sufficient for achieving maximum visual acuity. This critical band varied with the particular pair of letters to be discriminated but was in the range 0.9–2.2 cycles per letter.

© 1999 Optical Society of America

OCIS Codes
(330.1070) Vision, color, and visual optics : Vision - acuity
(330.1880) Vision, color, and visual optics : Detection
(330.5510) Vision, color, and visual optics : Psychophysics

History
Original Manuscript: August 3, 1998
Revised Manuscript: May 24, 1999
Manuscript Accepted: May 24, 1999
Published: October 1, 1999

Citation
Roger S. Anderson and Larry N. Thibos, "Sampling limits and critical bandwidth for letter discrimination in peripheral vision," J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 16, 2334-2342 (1999)
http://www.opticsinfobase.org/josaa/abstract.cfm?URI=josaa-16-10-2334


Sort:  Author  |  Year  |  Journal  |  Reset  

References

  1. A. P. Ginsburg, “Specifying relevant spatial information for image evaluation and display designs: an explanation of how we see certain objects,” Proc. Soc. Inf. Displ. 21, 219–227 (1980).
  2. G. E. Legge, D. G. Pelli, G. S. Rubin, M. M. Schleske, “Psychophysics of reading. 1. Normal vision,” Vision Res. 25, 239–252 (1985). [CrossRef]
  3. D. H. Parish, G. Sperling, “Object spatial frequencies, retinal spatial frequencies, noise and the efficiency of letter discrimination,” Vision Res. 31, 1399–1415 (1991). [CrossRef]
  4. J. A. Solomon, D. G. Pelli, “The visual filter mediating letter identification,” Nature 369, 395–397 (1994). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. V. M. Bondarko, M. V. Danilova, “What spatial frequency do we use to detect the orientation of a Landolt C?” Vision Res. 37, 2153–2156 (1997). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. S. T. L. Chung, G. E. Legge, “Spatial-frequency dependence of letter recognition in central and peripheral vision,” Invest. Ophthalmol. Visual Sci. 38, S639 (1997).
  7. K. R. Alexander, W. Xie, D. J. Derlacki, “Spatial-frequency characteristics of letter identification,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 11, 2375–2382 (1994). [CrossRef]
  8. D. R. Williams, “Aliasing in human foveal vision,” Vision Res. 25, 195–205 (1985). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. D. R. Williams, P. Artal, R. Navarro, M. J. McMahon, D. H. Brainard, “Off-axis optical quality and retinal sampling in the human eye,” Vision Res. 36, 1103–1114 (1996). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. L. N. Thibos, D. L. Still, A. Bradley, “Characterization of spatial aliasing and contrast sensitivity in peripheral vision,” Vision Res. 36, 249–258 (1996). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. L. N. Thibos, D. J. Walsh, F. E. Cheney, “Vision beyond the resolution limit: aliasing in the periphery,” Vision Res. 27, 2193–2197 (1987). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Y. Z. Wang, L. N. Thibos, A. Bradley, “Undersampling produces non-veridical motion perception, but not necessarily motion reversal, in peripheral vision,” Vision Res. 36, 1737–1744 (1996). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Y. Wang, A. Bradley, L. N. Thibos, “Aliased frequencies enable the discrimination of compound gratings in peripheral vision,” Vision Res. 37, 283–290 (1997). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Y. Z. Wang, A. Bradley, L. N. Thibos, “Interaction between sub- and supra-Nyquist spatial frequencies in peripheral vision,” Vision Res. 37, 2545–2552 (1997). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. S. J. Galvin, D. R. Williams, “No aliasing at edges in normal viewing,” Vision Res. 32, 2251–2259 (1992). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. R. S. Anderson, L. N. Thibos, “The relationship between acuity for gratings and for tumbling-E letters in peripheral vision,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 16, 2321–2333 (1999). [CrossRef]
  17. L. N. Thibos, “Acuity perimetry and the sampling theory of visual resolution,” Optom. Vision Sci. 75, 399–406 (1997). [CrossRef]
  18. J. Rovamo, V. Virsu, P. Laurinen, L. Hyvarinen, “Resolution of gratings oriented along and across meridians in peripheral vision,” Invest. Ophthalmol. Visual Sci. 23, 666–670 (1982).
  19. L. A. Temme, L. Malcus, W. K. Noell, “Peripheral visual field is radially organized,” Am. J. Optom. Physiol. Opt. 62, 545–554 (1985). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. R. S. Anderson, M. O. Wilkinson, L. N. Thibos, “Psychophysical localization of the human visual streak,” Optom. Vision Sci. 69, 171–174 (1992). [CrossRef]
  21. D. R. Williams, N. J. Coletta, “Cone spacing and the visual resolution limit,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 4, 1514–1523 (1987). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Our experimental method for blurring letters is qualitatively different from the blurring of an eye chart by uncorrected refractive error. The effect of optical blur depends on the retinal frequency (cycles per deg), not on the object frequency (c/let). Therefore the loss of high object frequencies in small letters caused by optical blurring may be recovered by increasing the size of the letters. However, no such recovery is possible when letters are filtered according to their object frequency.
  23. R. S. Anderson, D. W. Evans, L. N. Thibos, “Effect of window size on detection acuity and resolution acuity for sinusoidal gratings in central and peripheral vision,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 13, 697–706 (1996). [CrossRef]
  24. P. J. Bennett, M. S. Banks, “Sensitivity loss in odd-symmetric mechanisms and phase anomalies in peripheral vision,” Nature 326, 873–876 (1987). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. D. M. Levi, S. A. Klein, “The role of separation and eccentricity in encoding position,” Vision Res. 30, 557–585 (1990). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. R. F. Hess, D. Field, “Is the increased spatial uncertainty in the normal periphery due to spatial undersampling or uncalibrated disarray?” Vision Res. 33, 2663–2670 (1993). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

Cited By

Alert me when this paper is cited

OSA is able to provide readers links to articles that cite this paper by participating in CrossRef's Cited-By Linking service. CrossRef includes content from more than 3000 publishers and societies. In addition to listing OSA journal articles that cite this paper, citing articles from other participating publishers will also be listed.


« Previous Article  |  Next Article »

OSA is a member of CrossRef.

CrossCheck Deposited