OSA's Digital Library

Journal of the Optical Society of America A

Journal of the Optical Society of America A

| OPTICS, IMAGE SCIENCE, AND VISION

  • Vol. 16, Iss. 10 — Oct. 1, 1999
  • pp: 2370–2376

Predicting color from gray: the relationship between achromatic adjustment and asymmetric matching

Jon M. Speigle and David H. Brainard  »View Author Affiliations


JOSA A, Vol. 16, Issue 10, pp. 2370-2376 (1999)
http://dx.doi.org/10.1364/JOSAA.16.002370


View Full Text Article

Acrobat PDF (160 KB)





Browse Journals / Lookup Meetings

Browse by Journal and Year


   


Lookup Conference Papers

Close Browse Journals / Lookup Meetings

Article Tools

Share
Citations

Abstract

Achromatic adjustment has been used widely to study color context effects. In the achromatic adjustment procedure, an observer adjusts a test stimulus until it appears black, gray, or white. By its nature, achromatic adjustment directly measures the effect of context only for stimuli that appear gray. We present achromatic loci measured in two contexts and asymmetric color matches measured across the same two contexts. The results indicate that achromatic adjustments, together with a gain-control model, may be used to make accurate predictions of the chromaticity of asymmetric matches. Thus measurements of the effect of context for test stimuli that appear gray may be used to predict the effect of context for stimuli that appear colored. The experiments also indicate that accurate prediction depends on ensuring that observers use similar fixational strategies for the two judgments.

© 1999 Optical Society of America

OCIS Codes
(330.1690) Vision, color, and visual optics : Color
(330.1710) Vision, color, and visual optics : Color, measurement
(330.1720) Vision, color, and visual optics : Color vision

Citation
Jon M. Speigle and David H. Brainard, "Predicting color from gray: the relationship between achromatic adjustment and asymmetric matching," J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 16, 2370-2376 (1999)
http://www.opticsinfobase.org/josaa/abstract.cfm?URI=josaa-16-10-2370


Sort:  Author  |  Year  |  Journal  |  Reset

References

  1. H. Helson and W. C. Michels, “The effect of chromatic adaptation on achromaticity,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. 38, 1025–1032 (1948).
  2. R. W. G. Hunt and L. M. Winter, “Color adaptation in picture-viewing situations,” J. Phot. Sci. 23, 112–115 (1975).
  3. J. S. Werner and J. Walraven, “Effect of chromatic adaptation on the achromatic locus: the role of contrast, luminance and background color,” Vision Res. 22, 929–944 (1982).
  4. R. S. Berns and M. E. Gorzynski, “Simulating surface colors on CRT displays: the importance of cognitive clues,” in Proceedings of the AIC Conference: Colour and Light (Association Internationale de la Couleur, 1991), pp. 21–24.
  5. M. D. Fairchild and P. Lennie, “Chromatic adaptation to natural and incandescent illuminants,” Vision Res. 32, 2077–2085 (1992).
  6. K. H. Bauml, “Color appearance: effects of illuminant changes under different surface collections,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 11, 531–542 (1994).
  7. D. H. Brainard and K. Ishigami, “Factors influencing the appearance of CRT colors,” in Proceedings of the IS&T/SID Color Imaging Conference: Color Science, Systems, and Applications (Society for Imaging Science and Technology, Springfield, Va., 1995), pp. 62–66.
  8. E. J. Chichilnisky and B. A. Wandell, “Seeing gray through the on and off pathways,” Visual Neurosci. 13, 591–596 (1996).
  9. D. H. Brainard, “Color constancy in the nearly natural image. 2. Achromatic loci,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 15, 307–325 (1998).
  10. H. Helson, “Fundamental problems in color vision. I. The principle governing changes in hue, saturation and lightness of non-selective samples in chromatic illumination,” J. Exp. Psychol. 23, 439–476 (1938).
  11. H. Helson and V. B. Jeffers, “Fundamental problems in color vision. II. Hue, lightness, and saturation of selective samples in chromatic illumination,” J. Exp. Psychol. 26, 1–27 (1940).
  12. J. J. McCann, S. P. McKee, and T. H. Taylor, “Quantitative studies in retinex theory: a comparison between theoretical predictions and observer responses to the ‘Color Mondrian’ experiments,” Vision Res. 16, 445–458 (1976).
  13. L. E. Arend and A. Reeves, “Simultaneous color constancy,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 3, 1743–1751 (1986).
  14. A. Valberg and B. Lange-Malecki, “Mondrian complexity does not improve ‘color constancy’,” Invest. Ophthalmol. Visual Sci. Suppl. 28, 92 (1987).
  15. D. H. Brainard and B. A. Wandell, “Asymmetric color-matching: how color appearance depends on the illuminant,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 9, 1433–1448 (1992).
  16. M. P. Lucassen and J. Walraven, “Color constancy under natural and artificial illumination,” Vision Res. 36, 2699–2711 (1996).
  17. D. H. Brainard, W. A. Brunt, and J. M. Speigle, “Color constancy in the nearly natural image. 1. Asymmetric matches,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 14, 2091–2110 (1997).
  18. W. S. Stiles, “Mechanism concepts in colour theory,” J. Colour Group 11, 106–123 (1967).
  19. J. M. Speigle and D. H. Brainard, “Luminosity thresholds: effects of test chromaticity and ambient illumination,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 13, 436–451 (1996).
  20. K. H. Bauml, “Illuminant changes under different surface collections: examining some principles of color appearance,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 12, 261–271 (1995).
  21. E. J. Chichilnisky and B. A. Wandell, “Photoreceptor sensitivity changes explain color appearance shifts induced by large uniform backgrounds in dichoptic matching,” Vision Res. 35, 239–254 (1995).
  22. J. von Kries, “Chromatic adaptation” [originally published in Festschrift der Albrecht-Ludwigs-Universitat (Fribourg, Germany, 1902), pp. 145–148.] In Sources of Color Vision, L. D. MacAdam, ed. (MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass., 1970), pp. 109–126.
  23. D. Jameson and L. M. Hurvich, “Theory of brightness and color contrast in human vision,” Vision Res. 4, 135–154 (1964).
  24. J. Walraven, “Discounting the background: the missing link in the explanation of chromatic induction,” Vision Res. 16, 289–295 (1976).
  25. S. K. Shevell, “The dual role of chromatic backgrounds in color perception,” Vision Res. 18, 1649–1661 (1978).
  26. J. M. Speigle, “Testing whether a common representation explains the effects of viewing context on color appearance,” Ph.D. dissertation (University of California, Santa Barbara, Calif., 1997).
  27. A goodness-of-fit test does indicate that the difference between full diagonal and alternating-fixation, achromatic constrained models is statistically significant (F-test for nested linear models applied to CIELAB E* errors; p< 0.05 for all observers.) This test, however, does not reflect prediction error induced by error in measurement of the achromatic loci.
  28. J. M. Kraft and D. H. Brainard, “Mechanisms of color constancy under nearly natural viewing,” Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 96, 307–312 (1999).
  29. V. Smith and J. Pokorny, “Spectral sensitivity of the foveal cone photopigments between 400 and 500 nm,” Vision Res. 15, 161–171 (1975).
  30. P. DeMarco, J. Pokorny, and V. C. Smith, “Full-spectrum cone sensitivity functions for X-chromosome-linked anomalous trichromats,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 9, 1465–1476 (1992).

Cited By

Alert me when this paper is cited

OSA is able to provide readers links to articles that cite this paper by participating in CrossRef's Cited-By Linking service. CrossRef includes content from more than 3000 publishers and societies. In addition to listing OSA journal articles that cite this paper, citing articles from other participating publishers will also be listed.


« Previous Article  |  Next Article »

OSA is a member of CrossRef.

CrossCheck Deposited