OSA's Digital Library

Journal of the Optical Society of America A

Journal of the Optical Society of America A

| OPTICS, IMAGE SCIENCE, AND VISION

  • Vol. 16, Iss. 11 — Nov. 1, 1999
  • pp: 2601–2611

Temporal detection in human vision: dependence on spatial frequency

R. E. Fredericksen and R. F. Hess  »View Author Affiliations


JOSA A, Vol. 16, Issue 11, pp. 2601-2611 (1999)
http://dx.doi.org/10.1364/JOSAA.16.002601


View Full Text Article

Enhanced HTML    Acrobat PDF (198 KB)





Browse Journals / Lookup Meetings

Browse by Journal and Year


   


Lookup Conference Papers

Close Browse Journals / Lookup Meetings

Article Tools

Share
Citations

Abstract

In the study of perception of temporal changes in luminance, it is customary to model perceptual performance as based on one or more linear filters. The task is then to estimate the temporal impulse responses or the representation of the impulse response in the frequency domain. Previously, temporal masking data have been used to estimate the properties and numbers of these temporal mechanisms (filters) in central vision for 1-cycle-per-degree (cpd) targets [Vision Res. 38, 1023 (1998)]. The same methods have been used to explore how properties of the estimated filters change with stimulus contrast energy [J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 14, 2557 (1997)]. We present estimated properties for temporal mechanisms that detect low spatial-frequency patterns. The results indicate that two filters provide the best model for performance when mask contrast is significant. There are also differences between properties for mechanisms that detect signal spatial frequencies of 1 cpd and 1/3 cpd. The sensitivity of the low-pass mechanism relative to the bandpass mechanism is reduced at 1/3 cpd, consistent with previous findings.

© 1999 Optical Society of America

OCIS Codes
(330.1880) Vision, color, and visual optics : Detection
(330.4060) Vision, color, and visual optics : Vision modeling
(330.5510) Vision, color, and visual optics : Psychophysics
(330.6790) Vision, color, and visual optics : Temporal discrimination

History
Original Manuscript: December 1, 1998
Revised Manuscript: July 27, 1999
Manuscript Accepted: July 27, 1999
Published: November 1, 1999

Citation
R. E. Fredericksen and R. F. Hess, "Temporal detection in human vision: dependence on spatial frequency," J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 16, 2601-2611 (1999)
http://www.opticsinfobase.org/josaa/abstract.cfm?URI=josaa-16-11-2601


Sort:  Author  |  Year  |  Journal  |  Reset  

References

  1. R. E. Fredericksen, R. F. Hess, “Estimating multiple temporal mechanisms in human vision,” Vision Res. 38, 1023–1040 (1998). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. R. E. Fredericksen, R. F. Hess, “Temporal detection in human vision: dependence on stimulus energy,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 14, 2557–2569 (1997). [CrossRef]
  3. I. E. Holliday, K. H. Ruddock, “Two spatio-temporal filters in human vision. 1. Temporal and spatial frequency response characteristics,” Biol. Cybern. 47, 173–190 (1983). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. J. A. Roufs, F. J. Blommaert, “Temporal impulse and step responses of the human eye obtained psychophysically by means of a drift-correcting perturbation technique,” Vision Res. 21, 1203–1221 (1981). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. B. Breitmeyer, D. Levi, R. S. Harwerth, “Flicker masking in spatial vision,” Vision Res. 21, 1377–1385 (1981). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. G. E. Legge, “Sustained and transient mechanisms in human vision: temporal and spatial properties,” Vision Res. 18, 69–81 (1978). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. U. T. Keesey, “Flicker and pattern detection: a comparison of thresholds,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. 62, 446–448 (1972). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. J. J. Kulikowski, D. J. Tolhurst, “Psychophysical evidence for sustained and transient detectors in human vision,” J. Physiol. (London) 232, 149–162 (1973).
  9. A. J. Pantle, “Temporal frequency response characteristic of motion channels measured with three different psychophysical techniques,” Percept. Psychophys. 24, 285–294 (1978). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. A. J. Pantle, “Temporal determinants of spatial sine-wave masking,” Vision Res. 23, 749–757 (1983). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. A. B. Metha, K. T. Mullen, “Temporal mechanisms underlying flicker detection and identification for red–green and achromatic stimuli,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 13, 1969–1980 (1996). [CrossRef]
  12. A. B. Metha, K. T. Mullen, “Red–green and achromatic temporal filters: a ratio model predicts contrast-dependent speed perception,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 14, 984–996 (1997). [CrossRef]
  13. S. T. Hammett, A. T. Smith, “Two temporal channels or three? A reevaluation,” Vision Res. 32, 285–291 (1992). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. R. F. Hess, R. J. Snowden, “Temporal properties of human visual filters: number, shapes and spatial covariation,” Vision Res. 32, 47–59 (1992). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. R. J. Snowden, R. F. Hess, “Temporal frequency filters in the human peripheral visual field,” Vision Res. 32, 61–72 (1992). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. M. B. Mandler, W. Makous, “A three channel model of temporal frequency perception,” Vision Res. 24, 1881–1887 (1984). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. R. F. Hess, G. T. Plant, “Temporal frequency discrimination in human vision: evidence for an additional mechanism in the low spatial and high temporal frequency region,” Vision Res. 25, 1493–1500 (1985). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. S. J. Waugh, R. F. Hess, “Suprathreshold temporal-frequency discrimination in the fovea and the periphery,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 11, 1199–1212 (1994). [CrossRef]
  19. S. R. Lehky, “Temporal properties of visual channels measured by masking,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 2, 1260–1272 (1985). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. We use the term energy in the general sense of Parseval’s theorem or the integrated, squared amplitude of the signal in either the spatiotemporal or Fourier domain. Contrast energy refers to the integrated, squared contrast.
  21. D. G. Albrecht, “Visual cortex neurons in monkey and cat: effect of contrast on the spatial and temporal phase transfer functions,” Vis. Neurosci. 12, 1191–1210 (1995). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. W. S. Geisler, D. G. Albrecht, “Cortical neurons: isolation of contrast gain control,” Vision Res. 32, 1409–1410 (1992). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. G. Sclar, “Expression of ‘retinal’ contrast gain control by neurones of the cat’s lateral geniculate cortex,” Exp. Brain Res. 66, 589–596 (1987). [CrossRef]
  24. R. M. Shapley, J. D. Victor, “The effect of contrast on the transfer properties of cat retinal ganglion cells,” J. Physiol. (London) 285, 275–298 (1978).
  25. R. M. Shapley, J. D. Victor, “The contrast gain control of the cat retina,” Vision Res. 19, 431–434 (1979). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. R. M. Shapley, J. D. Victor, “How the contrast gain control modifies the frequency responses of cat retinal ganglion cells,” J. Physiol. (London) 318, 161–179 (1981).
  27. It is a common practice in the recent literature to refer to these filters as mechanisms. We will use the term in the appropriate context throughout this paper.
  28. J. G. Robson, “Spatial and temporal contrast sensitivity functions of the visual system,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. 56, 1141–1142 (1966). [CrossRef]
  29. F. W. Campbell, J. G. Robson, “Application of Fourier analysis to the visibility of gratings,” J. Physiol. (London) 197, 551–566 (1968).
  30. D. H. Kelly, “Visual responses to time-dependent stimuli. I. Amplitude sensitivity measurements,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. 51, 422–429 (1961). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  31. D. H. Kelly, “Diffusion model of linear flicker responses,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. 59, 1665–1670 (1969). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. D. H. Kelly, “Theory of flicker and transient responses. I. Uniform fields,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. 61, 537–546 (1971). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. We use the term filter sensitivity to refer to the ability of a filter to detect the stimulus (signal). This is distinct from the filter’s gain, because signal detectability is also determined by intrinsic noise and filter efficiency.
  34. The intrinsic noise level and the filter gain (peak of the filter modulation transfer function) can be written as a ratio in our model. We can therefore know only the relative values of these two parameters. That is, we know the modulation transfer function to within only a scaling constant.
  35. D. J. Field, “Relations between the statistics of natural images and the response properties of cortical cells,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 4, 2379–2394 (1987). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. W. H. Press, A. A. Teukolsky, W. T. Vetterling, B. P. Flannery, Numerical Recipies in C, 2nd ed. (Cambridge U. Press, Cambridge, UK, 1992).
  37. A. B. Watson, D. G. Pelli, “QUEST: a Bayesian adaptive psychometric method,” Percept. Psychophys. 33, 113–120 (1983). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. N. A. Macmillan, C. D. Creelman, Detection Theory: A User’s Guide (Cambridge U. Press, Cambridge, UK, 1991).
  39. Use of residual error as an acceptance metric for a model depends on whether the required assumptions have been met. See the Appendix A for a brief discussion of this topic.
  40. The low-pass ad hoc filter was constructed to have a TMTF falling slope that matched the masking data at low temporal test frequencies. The bandpass ad hoc filters were constructed to have rising and falling TMTF slopes that matched the masking data for high temporal test frequencies.
  41. We tested all combinations of one, two, and three ad hoc filters for which at least one filter was a low-pass filter. That is, one low-pass filter alone, or one low-pass filter together with one or two bandpass filters. The low-pass ad hoc filter was constructed to have a TMTF falling slope that matched the masking data at low temporal test frequencies. The bandpass filter was constructed to have rising and falling TMTF slopes that matched the masking data for high temporal test frequencies.
  42. H. Akaike, “A new look at statistical model identification,” IEEE Trans. Autom. Control. 19, 716–723 (1974). [CrossRef]
  43. M. Forster, E. Sober, “How to tell when simpler, more unified, or less ad hoc theories will provide more accurate predictions,” Br. J. Philos. Sci. 45, 1–35 (1994). [CrossRef]
  44. J. Yang, W. Makous, “Spatiotemporal separability in contrast sensitivity,” Vision Res. 34, 2569–2576 (1994). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. J. Yang, W. Makous, “Implicit masking constrained by spatial inhomogeneities,” Vision Res. 37, 1917–1927 (1997). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. D. G. Pelli, “Effects of visual noise,” Ph.D. dissertation (Cambridge University, Cambridge, UK, 1981).
  47. Our experiments have employed temporally windowed and duration-limited signal and noise patterns. The temporal window shapes and durations were identical in all cases, and we currently do not model the temporal integration aspects of detection. Our definitions for power can therefore be considered, without loss of generality, as representing either (1) peak instantaneous power or (2) average power over the duration of the stimulus presentation.
  48. D. Lancaster, Lancaster’s Active Filter Cookbook, 2nd ed. (Biddles, Guildford, 1996).

Cited By

Alert me when this paper is cited

OSA is able to provide readers links to articles that cite this paper by participating in CrossRef's Cited-By Linking service. CrossRef includes content from more than 3000 publishers and societies. In addition to listing OSA journal articles that cite this paper, citing articles from other participating publishers will also be listed.

Figures

Fig. 1 Fig. 2 Fig. 3
 
Fig. 4
 

Next Article »

OSA is a member of CrossRef.

CrossCheck Deposited