OSA's Digital Library

Journal of the Optical Society of America A

Journal of the Optical Society of America A

| OPTICS, IMAGE SCIENCE, AND VISION

  • Vol. 16, Iss. 2 — Feb. 1, 1999
  • pp: 236–245

Model bias in Bayesian image reconstruction from x-ray fiber diffraction data

Shyamsunder Baskaran and R. P. Millane  »View Author Affiliations


JOSA A, Vol. 16, Issue 2, pp. 236-245 (1999)
http://dx.doi.org/10.1364/JOSAA.16.000236


View Full Text Article

Enhanced HTML    Acrobat PDF (932 KB)





Browse Journals / Lookup Meetings

Browse by Journal and Year


   


Lookup Conference Papers

Close Browse Journals / Lookup Meetings

Article Tools

Share
Citations

Abstract

An image-reconstruction problem in x-ray fiber diffraction analysis (which is used to determine the atomic structure of biopolymers) is considered. The problem is to reconstruct an image (the electron density function) given data that are squared sums of the Fourier coefficients of the image as well as partial information (the model) on the image. A Bayesian estimation approach based on a prior for the missing part of the image is considered. Current (heuristic) approaches to this problem correspond to certain maximum a posteriori estimates. These estimates exhibit bias toward the model, and current methods to reduce the bias are based on scaling of the Fourier coefficients. A new procedure to remove bias, based on orthogonalization, is derived and shown by simulations to be superior to scaling. Bias and unbiasing are compared for the different maximum a posteriori estimates, for different amounts of missing information. These results are also compared with a new minimum mean-square-error estimate for this problem that has the form of weighted maximum a posteriori Fourier coefficients. The minimum mean-square-error estimate is free from bias and gives results superior to the unbiased maximum a posteriori estimates.

© 1999 Optical Society of America

OCIS Codes
(070.6020) Fourier optics and signal processing : Continuous optical signal processing
(100.3010) Image processing : Image reconstruction techniques
(100.3190) Image processing : Inverse problems

History
Original Manuscript: May 1, 1998
Revised Manuscript: September 8, 1998
Manuscript Accepted: October 2, 1998
Published: February 1, 1999

Citation
Shyamsunder Baskaran and R. P. Millane, "Model bias in Bayesian image reconstruction from x-ray fiber diffraction data," J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 16, 236-245 (1999)
http://www.opticsinfobase.org/josaa/abstract.cfm?URI=josaa-16-2-236


Sort:  Author  |  Year  |  Journal  |  Reset  

References

  1. R. P. Millane, “Phase retrieval in crystallography and optics,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 7, 394–411 (1990). [CrossRef]
  2. J. Drenth, Principles of Protein X-Ray Crystallography (Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1994).
  3. A. D. French, K. H. Gardner, eds., Fiber Diffraction Methods (American Chemical Society, Washington, D.C., 1980).
  4. R. P. Millane, “Structure determination by x-ray fiber diffraction,” in Crystallographic Computing 4: Techniques and New Technologies, N. W. Isaacs, M. R. Taylor, eds. (Oxford U. Press, Oxford, 1988), pp. 169–186.
  5. R. P. Millane, “Image reconstruction from cylindrically averaged diffraction intensities,” in Digital Image Recovery and Synthesis II, P. S. Idell, ed., Proc. SPIE2029, 137–143 (1993). [CrossRef]
  6. S. Baskaran, R. P. Millane, “Bayesian image reconstruction from partial image and spectral intensity data,” IEEE Trans. Image Process (to be published).
  7. S. Baskaran, R. P. Millane, “Bayesian image reconstruction from partial image and spectral amplitude data,” in Image Reconstruction and Restoration II, T. J. Schulz, ed., Proc. SPIE3170, 227–237 (1997). [CrossRef]
  8. R. P. Millane, S. Baskaran, “Optimal difference Fourier synthesis in fiber diffraction,” Fiber Diffract. Rev. 6, 14–18 (1997).
  9. A. J. C. Wilson, “The probability distribution of x-ray intensities,” Acta Crystallogr. 2, 318–321 (1949). [CrossRef]
  10. S. Chandrasekhar, “Stochastic problems in physics and astronomy,” Rev. Mod. Phys. 15, 1–89 (1943). [CrossRef]
  11. G. Stubbs, “The probability distributions of x-ray intensities in fiber diffraction: largest likely values of fiber diffraction R factors,” Acta Crystallogr. Sect. A 45, 254–258 (1989). [CrossRef]
  12. R. P. Millane, “Intensity distributions in fiber diffraction,” Acta Crystallogr. Sect. A 46, 552–559 (1990). [CrossRef]
  13. F. Natterer, The Mathematics of Computerized Tomography (Wiley, New York, 1986).
  14. I. S. Gradshteyn, I. M. Ryzhik, Table of Integrals, Series, and Products (Academic, New York, 1980), pp. 369, 665.
  15. M. M. Woolfson, “An improvement on the ‘heavy-atom’ method of solving crystal structures,” Acta Crystallogr. 9, 804–810 (1956). [CrossRef]
  16. G. A. Sim, “A note on the heavy-atom method,” Acta Crystallogr. 13, 511–512 (1960). [CrossRef]
  17. K. Namba, G. Stubbs, “Difference Fourier synthesis in fiber diffraction,” Acta Crystallogr. Sect. A 43, 533–539 (1987). [CrossRef]
  18. C. R. Rao, Linear Statistical Inference and Its Applications (Wiley, New York, 1973).
  19. A. K. Jain, Fundamentals of Digital Image Processing (Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, N.J., 1989).
  20. R. Henderson, J. K. Moffat, “The difference Fourier technique in protein crystallography: errors and their treatment,” Acta Crystallogr. Sect. B 27, 1414–1420 (1971). [CrossRef]
  21. R. J. Read, “Improved Fourier coefficients for maps using phases from partial structures with errors,” Acta Crystallogr. Sect. A 42, 140–149 (1986). [CrossRef]

Cited By

Alert me when this paper is cited

OSA is able to provide readers links to articles that cite this paper by participating in CrossRef's Cited-By Linking service. CrossRef includes content from more than 3000 publishers and societies. In addition to listing OSA journal articles that cite this paper, citing articles from other participating publishers will also be listed.


« Previous Article  |  Next Article »

OSA is a member of CrossRef.

CrossCheck Deposited