OSA's Digital Library

Journal of the Optical Society of America A

Journal of the Optical Society of America A

| OPTICS, IMAGE SCIENCE, AND VISION

  • Vol. 16, Iss. 3 — Mar. 1, 1999
  • pp: 755–763

Detection in fixed and random noise in foveal and parafoveal vision explained by template learning

Bettina L. Beard and Albert J. Ahumada, Jr.  »View Author Affiliations


JOSA A, Vol. 16, Issue 3, pp. 755-763 (1999)
http://dx.doi.org/10.1364/JOSAA.16.000755


View Full Text Article

Enhanced HTML    Acrobat PDF (605 KB)





Browse Journals / Lookup Meetings

Browse by Journal and Year


   


Lookup Conference Papers

Close Browse Journals / Lookup Meetings

Article Tools

Share
Citations

Abstract

Foveal and parafoveal contrast detection thresholds for Gabor and checkerboard targets were measured in white noise by means of a two-interval forced-choice paradigm. Two white-noise conditions were used: fixed and twin. In the fixed noise condition a single noise sample was presented in both intervals of all the trials. In the twin noise condition the same noise sample was used in the two intervals of a trial, but a new sample was generated for each trial. Fixed noise conditions usually resulted in lower thresholds than twin noise. Template learning models are presented that attribute this advantage of fixed over twin noise either to fixed memory templates’ reducing uncertainty by incorporation of the noise or to the introduction, by the learning process itself, of more variability in the twin noise condition. Quantitative predictions of the template learning process show that it contributes to the accelerating nonlinear increase in performance with signal amplitude at low signal-to-noise ratios.

© 1999 Optical Society of America

OCIS Codes
(330.1880) Vision, color, and visual optics : Detection
(330.4060) Vision, color, and visual optics : Vision modeling
(330.5510) Vision, color, and visual optics : Psychophysics
(330.6100) Vision, color, and visual optics : Spatial discrimination
(330.7310) Vision, color, and visual optics : Vision

History
Original Manuscript: July 6, 1998
Revised Manuscript: November 3, 1998
Manuscript Accepted: November 4, 1998
Published: March 1, 1999

Citation
Bettina L. Beard and Albert J. Ahumada, "Detection in fixed and random noise in foveal and parafoveal vision explained by template learning," J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 16, 755-763 (1999)
http://www.opticsinfobase.org/josaa/abstract.cfm?URI=josaa-16-3-755


Sort:  Author  |  Year  |  Journal  |  Reset  

References

  1. A. B. Watson, “Efficiency of a model human image code,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 4, 2401–2417 (1987). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. S. Daly, “The visible difference predictor: an algorithm for the assessment of image fidelity,” in Digital Images and Human Vision, A. B. Watson, ed. (MIT, Cambridge, Mass., 1993).
  3. J. Lubin, “The use of psychophysical data and models in the analysis of display system performance,” in Digital Images and Human Vision, A. B. Watson, ed. (MIT, Cambridge, Mass., 1993).
  4. P. C. Teo, D. J. Heeger, “Perceptual image distortion,” in Human Vision, Visual Processing, and Digital Display, B. Rogowitz, J. Allebach, eds., Proc. SPIE2179, 127–141 (1994). [CrossRef]
  5. H. R. Wilson, “Quantitative models for pattern detection and discrimination,” in Vision Models for Target Detection and Recognition, E. Peli, ed. (World Scientific, Teaneck, N.J., 1995).
  6. A. B. Watson, J. A. Solomon, “Model of visual contrast gain control and pattern masking,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 14, 2379–2391 (1997). [CrossRef]
  7. A. J. Ahumada, B. L. Beard, “Image discrimination models predict detection in fixed but not random noise,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 14, 2471–2476 (1997). [CrossRef]
  8. H. Barrett, “Evaluation of image quality through linear discriminate models,” Proc. Soc. Inf. Disp. 23, 871–873 (1992).
  9. A. Burgess, “Statistically defined backgrounds: performance of a modified nonprewhitening observer,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 11, 1237–1242 (1994). [CrossRef]
  10. M. Eckstein, A. B. Watson, A. J. Ahumada, “Visual signal detection in structured backgrounds. II. Effects of contrast gain control, background variations, and white noise,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 14, 2406–2419 (1997). [CrossRef]
  11. A. M. Rohaly, A. J. Ahumada, A. B. Watson, “Object detection in natural backgrounds predicted by discrimination performance and models,” Vision Res. 37, 3225–3235 (1997). [CrossRef]
  12. A. B. Watson, R. Borthwick, M. Taylor, “Image quality and entropy masking,” in Human Vision, Visual Processing, and Digital Display, B. Rogowitz, ed., Proc. SPIE3016, 2–12 (1997). [CrossRef]
  13. D. M. Levi, S. A. Klein, “Limitations on position coding imposed by undersampling and univariance,” Vision Res. 36, 2111–2120 (1996). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. G. E. Legge, D. Kersten, “Contrast discrimination in peripheral vision,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 4, 1594–1597 (1987). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. A. B. Watson, “Estimation of local spatial scale,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 4, 1579–1582 (1987). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. J. Rovamo, V. Virsu, “An estimation and application of the human cortical magnification factor,” Exp. Brain Res. 37, 495–510 (1979). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. D. J. Finney, Probit Analysis: A Statistical Treatment of the Sigmoid Response Curve, Cambridge U. Press (Cambridge, UK, 1947).
  18. A. B. Watson, H. B. Barlow, J. G. Robson, “What does the eye see best?” Nature (London) 302, 419–422 (1983). [CrossRef]
  19. L. D. Harmon, B. Julesz, “Masking in visual recognition: effects of two-dimensional filtered noise,” Science 180, 1194–1197 (1973). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. M. Fahle, S. Edelman, T. Poggio, “Fast perceptual learning in hyperacuity,” Vision Res. 35, 3003–3013 (1995). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  21. B. L. Beard, D. M. Levi, L. N. Reich, “Perceptual learning in parafoveal vision,” Vision Res. 35, 1679–1690 (1995). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. C. E. Osgood, “The similarity paradox in human learning: a resolution,” Psychol. Rev. 56, 132–143 (1949). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. M. Fahle, “Human pattern recognition: parallel processing and perceptual learning,” Perception 23, 411–427 (1994). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. B. L. Beard, A. J. Ahumada, “Tuning function changes after practice on a parafoveal vernier acuity task,” invited presentation at the Special Symposium on Hyperacuity at the European Conference on Visual Perception, Teubingen, Germany, September 9–13, 1996.
  25. D. G. Pelli, “Uncertainty explains many aspects of visual contrast detection and discrimination,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 2, 1508–1532 (1985). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. G. E. Legge, J. M. Foley, “Contrast masking in human vision,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 70, 1458–1471 (1980). [CrossRef]
  27. C. V. Jakowatz, R. L. Shuey, G. M. White, “Adaptive waveform recognition,” presented at the Symposium on Information Theory, Royal Institute, London, August 29–September 2, 1961.
  28. W. P. Tanner, “Physiological implications of psychophysical data,” Ann. (N.Y.) Acad. Sci. 89, 752–765 (1961). [CrossRef]

Cited By

Alert me when this paper is cited

OSA is able to provide readers links to articles that cite this paper by participating in CrossRef's Cited-By Linking service. CrossRef includes content from more than 3000 publishers and societies. In addition to listing OSA journal articles that cite this paper, citing articles from other participating publishers will also be listed.


« Previous Article  |  Next Article »

OSA is a member of CrossRef.

CrossCheck Deposited