OSA's Digital Library

Journal of the Optical Society of America A

Journal of the Optical Society of America A


  • Vol. 16, Iss. 7 — Jul. 1, 1999
  • pp: 1864–1872

Branch-point-tolerant least-squares phase reconstructor

William W. Arrasmith  »View Author Affiliations

JOSA A, Vol. 16, Issue 7, pp. 1864-1872 (1999)

View Full Text Article

Acrobat PDF (553 KB)

Browse Journals / Lookup Meetings

Browse by Journal and Year


Lookup Conference Papers

Close Browse Journals / Lookup Meetings

Article Tools



In reconstructing images from coherently illuminated objects, the far-field two-dimensional phase function in the entrance pupil plane (measurement plane) of a coherent imaging system has to contend with the presence of point discontinuities or branch points. The general class of least-squares phase reconstructors that use phase gradients (or phase differences) on a grid of points in the entrance pupil measurement plane fails to correctly determine the two-dimensional pupil phase when branch points are present. The phase estimation error results from the fact that the phase gradient or phase difference inputs to the least-squares reconstructor are being wrapped by the measurement system into the principal-value range [−π, π]. Recently, the existence and the determination of a hidden phase term was presented that accounts for branch-point effects [D. L. Fried, J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 15, 2759 (1998)]. Fried’s hidden phase term is used in this study to present a branch-point-tolerant least-squares phase reconstructor for estimation of the two-dimensional measurement-plane phase function. Simulations of three different types of coherently illuminated object demonstrate the utility of this approach. The sensitivity of the reconstruction method to additive Gaussian noise is also presented.

OCIS Codes
(010.1080) Atmospheric and oceanic optics : Active or adaptive optics
(030.1670) Coherence and statistical optics : Coherent optical effects
(030.6140) Coherence and statistical optics : Speckle
(030.6600) Coherence and statistical optics : Statistical optics
(030.7060) Coherence and statistical optics : Turbulence
(070.4560) Fourier optics and signal processing : Data processing by optical means
(070.6020) Fourier optics and signal processing : Continuous optical signal processing
(100.1830) Image processing : Deconvolution
(100.3010) Image processing : Image reconstruction techniques
(100.3190) Image processing : Inverse problems
(100.5070) Image processing : Phase retrieval
(110.1650) Imaging systems : Coherence imaging

William W. Arrasmith, "Branch-point-tolerant least-squares phase reconstructor," J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 16, 1864-1872 (1999)

Sort:  Author  |  Year  |  Journal  |  Reset


  1. G. Fornaro, G. Franceschetti, R. Lanari, and E. Sansosti, “Robust phase-unwrapping techniques: a comparison,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 13, 2355–2366 (1996).
  2. D. C. Ghiglia and L. A. Romero, “Robust two-dimensional weighted and unweighted phase unwrapping that uses fast transforms and iterative methods,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 11, 107–117 (1994).
  3. H. Takajo and T. Takahashi, “Least-squares phase estimation from the phase difference,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 5, 416–425 (1988).
  4. R. H. Hudgin, “Wave-front reconstruction for compensated imaging,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. 67, 375–378 (1977).
  5. D. L. Fried, “Least-squares fitting a wave-front distortion estimate to an array of phase-difference measurements,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. 67, 370–375 (1977).
  6. B. R. Hunt, “Matrix formulation of the reconstruction of phase values from phase differences,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. 69, 393–399 (1979).
  7. I. Freund, “Optical vortices in Gaussian random wave fields: statistical probability densities,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 11, 1644–1652 (1994).
  8. D. L. Fried and J. L. Vaughn, “Branch cuts in the phase function,” Appl. Opt. 31, 2865–2882 (1992).
  9. M. S. Scivier and M. A. Fiddy, “Phase ambiguities and the zeros of multidimensional band-limited functions,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 2, 693–697 (1985).
  10. S. Lowenthal and H. Arsenault, “Image formation for coherent diffuse objects: statistical properties,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. 60, 1478–1483 (1970).
  11. D. L. Fried, “Branch point problem in adaptive optics,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 13, 2759–2768 (1998).
  12. W. W. Arrasmith, M. Roggemann, and B. Welsh, “Optimal wave-front reconstruction for a coherent diffracted field,” Appl. Opt. 37, 4457–4467 (1998).
  13. R. A. Hutchin, “Sheared coherent interferometric photography: a technique for lensless imaging,” Proc. IEEE 2029, 161–168 (1993).
  14. J. W. Goodman, “Statistical properties of laser speckle patterns,” in Topics in Applied Physics, Vol. 9 of Laser Speckle and Related Phenomena (Springer-Verlag, New York, 1975).
  15. J. W. Goodman, Statistical Optics (Wiley-Interscience, New York, 1985).
  16. W. K. H. Panofsky and M. Phillips, Classical Electricity and Magnetism (Addison-Wesley, Reading, Mass., 1955), Eq. (1–1).
  17. M. C. Roggemann, “Optical performance of fully and partially compensated adaptive optics systems using least-squares and minimum variance phase reconstructors,” Computers Electr. Eng. 18, 451–466 (1992).
  18. B. M. Welsh and C. S. Gardner, “Performance analysis of adaptive-optics systems using laser guide stars and slope sensors,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 6, 1913–1923 (1989).

Cited By

Alert me when this paper is cited

OSA is able to provide readers links to articles that cite this paper by participating in CrossRef's Cited-By Linking service. CrossRef includes content from more than 3000 publishers and societies. In addition to listing OSA journal articles that cite this paper, citing articles from other participating publishers will also be listed.

« Previous Article

OSA is a member of CrossRef.

CrossCheck Deposited