OSA's Digital Library

Journal of the Optical Society of America A

Journal of the Optical Society of America A

| OPTICS, IMAGE SCIENCE, AND VISION

  • Vol. 16, Iss. 9 — Sep. 1, 1999
  • pp: 2059–2068

Biologically inspired local motion detector architecture

R. Beare and A. Bouzerdoum  »View Author Affiliations


JOSA A, Vol. 16, Issue 9, pp. 2059-2068 (1999)
http://dx.doi.org/10.1364/JOSAA.16.002059


View Full Text Article

Enhanced HTML    Acrobat PDF (204 KB)





Browse Journals / Lookup Meetings

Browse by Journal and Year


   


Lookup Conference Papers

Close Browse Journals / Lookup Meetings

Article Tools

Share
Citations

Abstract

A new directionally sensitive motion detection system is proposed that is capable of detecting local motion without any significant preprocessing. It has a delay-and-compare structure like that of the Reichardt detector but uses as its basic building block the shunting inhibition neural model. It is therefore called the local inhibitory motion detector. Furthermore, an array of such detectors exhibits adaptive responses akin to those observed in motion-sensitive biological neurons.

© 1999 Optical Society of America

OCIS Codes
(330.4150) Vision, color, and visual optics : Motion detection
(330.7320) Vision, color, and visual optics : Vision adaptation

History
Original Manuscript: July 23, 1998
Revised Manuscript: March 2, 1999
Manuscript Accepted: March 2, 1999
Published: September 1, 1999

Citation
R. Beare and A. Bouzerdoum, "Biologically inspired local motion detector architecture," J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 16, 2059-2068 (1999)
http://www.opticsinfobase.org/josaa/abstract.cfm?URI=josaa-16-9-2059


Sort:  Author  |  Year  |  Journal  |  Reset  

References

  1. B. Hassenstein, W. Reichardt, “Functional structure of a mechanism of perception of optical movement,” in Proceedings of the International Congress on Cybernetics (International Association of Cybernetics, Namur, Belgium, 1956), pp. 797–801.
  2. D. Hubel, T. N. Wiesel, “Receptive fields of single neurons in the cat’s striate cortex,” J. Physiol. (London) 148, 574–591 (1956).
  3. H. B. Barlow, R. M. Hill, W. R. Levick, “Retinal ganglion cells responding selectively to direction and speed of image motion in the rabbit,” J. Physiol. (London) 173, 377–407 (1964).
  4. G. B. McCann, “The fundamental mechanism of motion detection in the insect visual system,” Kybernetik 12, 64–73 (1973). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. E. Buchner, “Elementary movement detectors in an insect visual system,” Biol. Cybern. 24, 85–101 (1976). [CrossRef]
  6. K. Hausen, “The lobula-complex of the fly: structure, function, and significance in visual behaviour,” in Photoreception and Vision in Invertebrates, M. A. Ali, ed. (Plenum, London, 1984), pp. 523–559.
  7. M. Egelhaaf, W. E. Reichardt, “Dynamic response properties of movement detectors: theoretical analysis and electrophysical investigation in the visual system of the fly,” Biol. Cybern. 56, 69–87 (1987). [CrossRef]
  8. M. Egelhaaf, A. Borst, “Transient and steady-state response properties of movement detectors,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 6, 116–127 (1989). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. N. Franceschini, A. Riehle, A. Le Nestour, “Directionally sensitive motion detection by insect neurons,” in Facets of Vision, D. G. Stavenga, R. C. Hardie eds. (Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1989), pp. 360–389.
  10. G. A. Horridge, L. Marcelja, “Responses of the H1 neuron of the fly to contrast and moving bars,” Philos. Trans. R. Soc. London Ser. B 329, 75–80 (1990). [CrossRef]
  11. W. E. Reichardt, “Autocorrelation, a principle for the evaluation of sensory information by the nervous system,” in Sensory Communications, Contributions to Principles of Sensory Communications, W. A. Rosenblith, ed. (Proceedings of the Symposium on Principles of Sensory Communication, 1959) (MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass., 1961), pp. 303–317.
  12. H. B. Barlow, W. R. Levick, “The mechanism of directionally selective units in the rabbit’s retina,” J. Physiol. (London) 178, 477–504 (1965).
  13. E. H. Adelson, J. R. Bergen, “Spatiotemporal energy models for the perception of motion,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 2, 284–299 (1985). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. A. Bouzerdoum, R. B. Pinter, “Image motion processing in biological and computer vision systems,” in Visual Communications and Image Processing IV, W. A. Pearlman, ed. Proc. SPIE1199, 1229–1240 (1989). [CrossRef]
  15. H. Öğmen, S. Gagné, “Neural network architectures for motion perception and elementary motion detection in the fly visual system,” Neural Networks 3, 487–505 (1990). [CrossRef]
  16. W. H. Zaagman, H. A. K. Mastebroek, J. W. Kuiper, “On the correlation model: performance of a movement detecting neural element in the fly visual system,” Biol. Cybern. 31, 163–168 (1978). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. H. Eckert, “Functional properties of the H1-neurone in the third optic ganglion of the blowfly, Phaenicia,” J. Comp. Physiol. 135, 29–39 (1980). [CrossRef]
  18. A. Bouzerdoum, R. B. Pinter, “Nonlinear lateral inhibition applied to motion detection in the fly visual system,” in Nonlinear Vision: Determination of Neural Receptive Fields, Function, and Networks, R. B. Pinter, B. Nabet, eds. (CRC Press, Boca Raton, Fla., 1992), pp. 423–450.
  19. A. Bouzerdoum, “The elementary movement detection mechanism in insect vision,” Philos. Trans. R. Soc. London Ser. B 339, 375–384 (1993). [CrossRef]
  20. J. P. H. van Santen, G. Sperling, “Elaborated Reichardt detectors,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 2, 300–321 (1985). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  21. M. Egelhaaf, A. Borst, B. Pilz, “The role of GABA in detecting visual motion,” Brain Res. 509, 156–160 (1990). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. A. Schmid, H. Bulthoff, “Using neuropharmacology to distinguish between excitatory and inhibitory movement detection mechanisms in the fly Calliphora erythrocephala,” Biol. Cybern. 59, 71–80 (1988). [CrossRef]
  23. R. B. Pinter, “The electrophysiological basis for linear and for nonlinear product term lateral inhibition and the consequences for wide field textured stimuli,” J. Theor. Biol. 105, 233–243 (1983). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. D. W. Arnett, “Spatial and temporal integration properties of units in the first optic ganglion of dipterans,” J. Neurophysiol. 35, 429–444 (1972). [PubMed]
  25. J. H. van Hateren, “Theoretical predictions of spatiotemporal receptive fields of fly LMCs, and experimental validation,” J. Comp. Physiol. A 171, 157–170 (1992).
  26. R. B. Pinter, D. Osorio, M. V. Srinivasan, “Shift of edge-taxis to scototaxis depends on mean luminance and is predicted by a matched filter theory on the responses of fly lamina LMC cells,” Visual Neurosci. 4, 579–584 (1990). [CrossRef]
  27. S. Laughlin, “The role of sensory adaption in the retina,” J. Exp. Biol. 146, 39–62 (1989). [PubMed]
  28. M. V. Srinivasan, R. B. Pinter, D. Osorio, “Matched filtering in the visual system of the fly: large monopolar cells of the lamina are optimized to detect moving edges and blobs,” Proc. R. Soc. London Ser. B 240, 279–293 (1990). [CrossRef]
  29. G. A. Horridge, L. Marcelja, “Responses of the H1 neuron of the fly to jumped edges,” Philos. Trans. R. Soc. London Ser. B 327, 65–73 (1990). [CrossRef]
  30. H. Öğmen, S. Gagné, “Neural models for sustained and on–off units of insect lamina,” Biol. Cybern. 63, 51–60 (1990). [CrossRef]
  31. M. V. Srinivasan, “A proposed mechanism for multiplication of neural signals,” Biol. Cybern. 21, 227–236 (1976). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. A. Bouzerdoum, “Nonlinear lateral inhibitory neural networks analysis and application to motion detection,” Ph.D. dissertation (University of Washington, Seattle, Wash., 1991).

Cited By

Alert me when this paper is cited

OSA is able to provide readers links to articles that cite this paper by participating in CrossRef's Cited-By Linking service. CrossRef includes content from more than 3000 publishers and societies. In addition to listing OSA journal articles that cite this paper, citing articles from other participating publishers will also be listed.


Next Article »

OSA is a member of CrossRef.

CrossCheck Deposited