OSA's Digital Library

Journal of the Optical Society of America A

Journal of the Optical Society of America A


  • Vol. 16, Iss. 9 — Sep. 1, 1999
  • pp: 2079–2091

Dynamical use of different sources of information in heading judgments from retinal flow

Antje Grigo and Markus Lappe  »View Author Affiliations

JOSA A, Vol. 16, Issue 9, pp. 2079-2091 (1999)

View Full Text Article

Enhanced HTML    Acrobat PDF (210 KB)

Browse Journals / Lookup Meetings

Browse by Journal and Year


Lookup Conference Papers

Close Browse Journals / Lookup Meetings

Article Tools



The optic flow arising in the eyes of an observer during self-motion is influenced by the occurrence of eye movements. The determination of heading during eye movements may be based on the pattern of retinal image motion (the retinal flow) or on an additional use of an extraretinal eye-movement signal. Previous research has presented support for either of these hypotheses, depending on the movement geometry and the layout of the visual scene. A special situation in which all previous studies unequivocally have agreed that an extraretinal signal is required occurs when the visual scene consists of a single frontoparallel plane. In this situation eye movements shift the center of expansion on the retina to a location that does not correspond to the direction of self-movement. Without extraretinal input, human observers confuse the center of expansion with their heading and show a systematical heading estimation error. We reexamined and further investigated this situation. We presented retinal flow stimuli on a large projection screen in the absence of extraretinal input and varied stimulus size, presentation duration, and orientation of the plane. In contrast to previous studies we found that in the case of a perpendicular approach toward the plane, heading judgments can be accurate. Accurate judgments were observed when the field of view was large (90°×90°) and the stimulus duration was short (⩽0.5 s). For a small field of view or a prolonged stimulus presentation, a systematic and previously described error appeared that is related to the radial structure of the flow field and the location of the center of expansion. An oblique approach toward the plane results in an ambiguous flow field with two mathematically possible solutions for heading. In this situation, when the stimulus duration was short, subjects reported a perceived heading midway between these two solutions. For longer flow sequences, subjects again chose the center of expansion. Our results suggest a dynamical change in the analysis or interpretation of retinal flow during heading perception.

© 1999 Optical Society of America

OCIS Codes
(150.4620) Machine vision : Optical flow
(330.4150) Vision, color, and visual optics : Motion detection
(330.5510) Vision, color, and visual optics : Psychophysics

Original Manuscript: March 2, 1999
Manuscript Accepted: April 15, 1999
Published: September 1, 1999

Antje Grigo and Markus Lappe, "Dynamical use of different sources of information in heading judgments from retinal flow," J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 16, 2079-2091 (1999)

Sort:  Author  |  Year  |  Journal  |  Reset  


  1. J. J. Gibson, The Perception of the Visual World (Houghton Mifflin, Boston, Mass., 1950).
  2. J. J. Gibson, The Senses Considered As Perceptual Systems (Houghton Mifflin, Boston, Mass., 1966).
  3. C. S. Royden, M. S. Banks, J. A. Crowell, “The perception of heading during eye movements,” Nature (London) 360, 583–585 (1992). [CrossRef]
  4. C. S. Royden, J. A. Crowell, M. S. Banks, “Estimating heading during eye movements,” Vision Res. 34, 3197–3214 (1994). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. M. S. Banks, S. M. Ehrlich, B. T. Backus, J. A. Crowell, “Estimating heading during real and simulated eye movements,” Vision Res. 36, 431–443 (1996). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. W. H. Warren, D. J. Hannon, “Eye movements and optical flow,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 7, 160–169 (1990). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. A. V. van den Berg, “Perception of heading,” Nature (London) 365, 497–498 (1993). [CrossRef]
  8. W. H. Warren, M. W. Morris, M. Kalish, “Perception of translational heading from optical flow,” J. Exp. Psychol. Hum. Percept. Perform. 14, 646–660 (1988). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. J. J. Koenderink, A. J. van Doorn, “Exterospecific component of the motion parallax field,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. 71, 953–957 (1981). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. A. V. van den Berg, E. Brenner, “Humans combine the optic flow with static depth cues for robust perception of heading,” Vision Res. 34, 2153–2167 (1994). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. A. V. van den Berg, E. Brenner, “Why two eyes are better than one for judgements of heading,” Nature (London) 371, 700–702 (1994). [CrossRef]
  12. A. Grigo, M. Lappe, “Interaction of stereo vision and optic flow processing revealed by an illusory stimulus,” Vision Res. 38, 281–290 (1998). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. H. C. Longuet-Higgins, K. Prazdny, “The interpretation of a moving retinal image,” Proc. R. Soc. London, Ser. B 208, 385–397 (1980). [CrossRef]
  14. J. H. Rieger, L. Toet, “Human visual navigation in the presence of 3-D rotations,” Biol. Cybern. 52, 377–381 (1985). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. J. Cutting, Perception with an Eye for Motion (Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Mass., 1986).
  16. J. H. Rieger, D. T. Lawton, “Processing differential image motion,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 2, 354–360 (1985). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. T. S. Meese, M. G. Harris, T. C. A. Freeman, “Speed gradients and the perception of surface slant: analysis is two-dimensional not one-dimensional,” Vision Res. 35, 2879–2888 (1995). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. J. J. Koenderink, A. J. van Doorn, “Invariant properties of the motion parallax field due to the movement of rigid bodies relative to an observer,” Opt. Acta 22, 773–791 (1975). [CrossRef]
  19. J. J. Koenderink, A. J. van Doorn, “Local structure of movement parallax of the plane,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. 66, 717–723 (1976). [CrossRef]
  20. J. J. Koenderink, A. J. van Doorn, “Facts on optic flow,” Biol. Cybern. 56, 247–254 (1987). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  21. H. C. Longuet-Higgins, “The visual ambiguity of a moving plane,” Proc. R. Soc. London, Ser. B 223, 165–175 (1984). [CrossRef]
  22. C. S. Royden, “Analysis of misperceived observer motion during simulated eye rotations,” Vision Res. 34, 3215–3222 (1994). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. L. S. Stone, J. A. Perrone, “Human heading estimation during visually simulated curvilinear motion,” Vision Res. 37, 573–590 (1997). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. J. A. Crowell, C. S. Royden, M. S. Banks, K. H. Swenson, A. B. Sekuler, “Optic flow and heading judgements,” Invest. Ophthalmol. Visual Sci. Suppl. 31, 522 (1990).
  25. S. F. T. te Pas, A. M. L. Kappers, J. J. Koenderink, “Locating the singular point in first-order optical flow fields,” J. Exp. Psychol. Hum. Percept. Perform. 24, 1415–1430 (1998). [CrossRef]
  26. J. E. Cutting, R. T. Millard, “Three gradients and the perception of flat and curved surfaces,” J. Exp. Psych. Gen. 113, 198–216 (1984). [CrossRef]
  27. D. Buckley, J. P. Frisby, A. Blake, “Does the human visual system implement an ideal observer theory of slant from texture,” Vision Res. 36, 1163–1176 (1996). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. W. H. Warren, D. R. Mestre, A. W. Blackwell, M. W. Morris, “Perception of circular heading from optical flow,” J. Exp. Psychol. Hum. Percept. Perform. 17, 28–43 (1991). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. I. R. Johnston, G. R. White, R. W. Cumming, “The role of optical expansion patterns in locomotor control,” Am. J. Psychol. 86, 311–324 (1973). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  30. D. Regan, K. I. Beverley, “How do we avoid confounding the direction we are looking and the direction we are moving?” Science 215, 194–196 (1982). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  31. A. V. van den Berg, “Judgements of heading,” Vision Res. 36, 2337–2350 (1996). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. T. Haarmeier, M. Thier, P. ans Repnow, D. Petersen, “False perception of motion in a patient who cannot compensate for eye movements,” Nature (London) 389, 849–852 (1997). [CrossRef]
  33. A. H. Wertheim, “Retinal and extraretinal information in movement perception: how to invert the Filehne illusion,” Perception 16, 299–308 (1987). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. D. Solomon, B. Cohen, “Stabilization of gaze during circular locomotion in light. I. Compensatory head and eye nystagmus in the running monkey,” J. Neurophysiol. 67, 1146–1157 (1992). [PubMed]
  35. M. F. Land, “Predictable eye-head coordination during driving,” Nature (London) 359, 318–320 (1992). [CrossRef]
  36. M. Lappe, M. Pekel, K.-P. Hoffmann, “Optokinetic eye movements elicited by radial optic flow in the macaque monkey,” J. Neurophysiol. 79, 1461–1480 (1998). [PubMed]
  37. T. Niemann, M. Lappe, A. Büscher, K.-P. Hoffmann, “Ocular responses to radial optic flow and single accelerated targets in humans,” Vision Res. 39, 1359–1371 (1999). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

Cited By

Alert me when this paper is cited

OSA is able to provide readers links to articles that cite this paper by participating in CrossRef's Cited-By Linking service. CrossRef includes content from more than 3000 publishers and societies. In addition to listing OSA journal articles that cite this paper, citing articles from other participating publishers will also be listed.

« Previous Article  |  Next Article »

OSA is a member of CrossRef.

CrossCheck Deposited