OSA's Digital Library

Journal of the Optical Society of America A

Journal of the Optical Society of America A

| OPTICS, IMAGE SCIENCE, AND VISION

  • Vol. 17, Iss. 12 — Dec. 1, 2000
  • pp: 2391–2402

Uncertainty products for nonparaxial wave fields

M. A. Alonso and G. W. Forbes  »View Author Affiliations


JOSA A, Vol. 17, Issue 12, pp. 2391-2402 (2000)
http://dx.doi.org/10.1364/JOSAA.17.002391


View Full Text Article

Enhanced HTML    Acrobat PDF (629 KB)





Browse Journals / Lookup Meetings

Browse by Journal and Year


   


Lookup Conference Papers

Close Browse Journals / Lookup Meetings

Article Tools

Share
Citations

Abstract

Although maximal localization is a basic notion in the consideration of phase-space representations of fields, it has not yet been pursued for general wave fields. We develop measures of spatial and directional spreads for nonparaxial waves in free space. These measures are invariant under translation and rotation and are shown to reduce to the conventional ones when applied to paraxial fields. The associated uncertainty relation sets limits to joint localization in coordinate and frequency space. This relation provides a basis for the definition of a joint localization measure that is analogous to the beam propagation factor (i.e., M2) of paraxial optics. The results are first developed for two-dimensional fields and then generalized to three dimensions.

© 2000 Optical Society of America

OCIS Codes
(030.1670) Coherence and statistical optics : Coherent optical effects
(070.2590) Fourier optics and signal processing : ABCD transforms
(260.2160) Physical optics : Energy transfer
(350.5730) Other areas of optics : Resolution
(350.7420) Other areas of optics : Waves

History
Original Manuscript: March 20, 2000
Revised Manuscript: July 7, 2000
Manuscript Accepted: June 6, 2000
Published: December 1, 2000

Citation
M. A. Alonso and G. W. Forbes, "Uncertainty products for nonparaxial wave fields," J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 17, 2391-2402 (2000)
http://www.opticsinfobase.org/josaa/abstract.cfm?URI=josaa-17-12-2391


Sort:  Author  |  Year  |  Journal  |  Reset  

References

  1. L. Cohen, Time-Frequency Analysis (Prentice-Hall, N.J., 1995), Chap. 3.
  2. G. Folland, A. Sitaram, “The uncertainty principle: a mathematical survey,” J. Fourier Anal. Appl. 3, 207–238 (1997). [CrossRef]
  3. See Ref. 1, p. 46.
  4. M. W. Sasnett, “Propagation of multimode laser beams—the M2 factor,” in The Physics and Technology of Laser Resonators, D. R. Hall, P. E. Jackson, eds. (Hilger, Bristol, UK, 1989), pp. 132–142.
  5. A. E. Siegman, “New developments in laser resonators,” in Optical Resonators, D. A. Holmes, ed., Proc. SPIE1224, 2–14 (1990). [CrossRef]
  6. T. F. Johnston, “M2 concept characterises beam quality,” Laser Focus World 26(5), 173–183 (1990).
  7. The usefulness of M2 as a measure of beam quality has been questioned as a result of the sensitivity to noise of the second moments. See, for example, G. N. Lawrence, “Proposed international standard for laser-beam quality falls short,” Laser Focus World 30(7), 109–114 (1994).
  8. M. A. Porras, “The best quality optical beam beyond the paraxial approximation,” Opt. Commun. 111, 338–349 (1994). [CrossRef]
  9. G. W. Forbes, M. A. Alonso, “Measures of spread for periodic distributions and the associated uncertainty relations,” Am. J. Phys. (to be published).
  10. Since we are considering wave fields generated by distant sources, we ignore for now any evanescent components, which correspond to complex values of θ.
  11. A. Erdélyi, Asymptotic Expansions (Dover, New York, 1956), pp. 51–57.
  12. L. Mandel, E. Wolf, Optical Coherence and Quantum Optics, 1st ed. (Cambridge U. Press, New York, 1995), pp. 128–133.
  13. P. González-Casanova, K. B. Wolf, “Interpolation for solutions of the Helmholtz equation,” Numer. Methods Partial Diff. Eqns. 11, 77–91 (1995). [CrossRef]
  14. M. A. Alonso, “Measurement of Helmholtz wave fields,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 17, 1256–1264 (2000). [CrossRef]
  15. This form follows simply upon consideration of the process of wrapping a Gaussian distribution around a ring and summing the multiple values at each location. The Fourier coefficients of the result are then given as an integral over all θ of a Gaussian times exp(imθ), which is once again a Gaussian. The form of Eq. (9.4) then follows.
  16. This form is completely analogous to the standard form of the angular momentum operator used in elementary quantum mechanics. See, for example, R. L. Liboff, Quantum Mechanics (Addison-Wesley, Reading, Mass., 1980), p. 327.
  17. See the reference given in Note 7.
  18. E. Wigner, “On the correction for thermodynamic equilibrium,” Phys. Rev. 40, 749–759 (1932). [CrossRef]
  19. H. W. Lee, “Theory and application of the quantum phase-space distribution functions,” Phys. Rep. 259, 147–211 (1995). [CrossRef]
  20. A. Walther, “Radiometry and coherence,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. 58, 1256–1259 (1968). [CrossRef]
  21. M. Bastiaans, “Wigner distribution function and its application to first-order optics,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. 69, 1710–1716 (1979). [CrossRef]
  22. A. Lohmann, “The Wigner function and its optical production,” Opt. Commun. 42, 32–37 (1980).
  23. K. B. Wolf, M. A. Alonso, G. W. Forbes, “Wigner functions for Helmholtz wave fields,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 16, 2476–2487 (1999). [CrossRef]

Cited By

Alert me when this paper is cited

OSA is able to provide readers links to articles that cite this paper by participating in CrossRef's Cited-By Linking service. CrossRef includes content from more than 3000 publishers and societies. In addition to listing OSA journal articles that cite this paper, citing articles from other participating publishers will also be listed.


« Previous Article  |  Next Article »

OSA is a member of CrossRef.

CrossCheck Deposited