OSA's Digital Library

Journal of the Optical Society of America A

Journal of the Optical Society of America A

| OPTICS, IMAGE SCIENCE, AND VISION

  • Vol. 17, Iss. 2 — Feb. 1, 2000
  • pp: 206–217

Visual signal detection in structured backgrounds. IV. Figures of merit for model performance in multiple-alternative forced-choice detection tasks with correlated responses

Miguel P. Eckstein, Craig K. Abbey, and François O. Bochud  »View Author Affiliations


JOSA A, Vol. 17, Issue 2, pp. 206-217 (2000)
http://dx.doi.org/10.1364/JOSAA.17.000206


View Full Text Article

Enhanced HTML    Acrobat PDF (839 KB)





Browse Journals / Lookup Meetings

Browse by Journal and Year


   


Lookup Conference Papers

Close Browse Journals / Lookup Meetings

Article Tools

Share
Citations

Abstract

Many investigators are currently developing models to predict human performance in detecting a signal embedded in complex backgrounds. A common figure of merit for model performance is d, an index of detectability that can be mathematically related to the proportion correct (Pc) when the responses of the model are Gaussian distributed and statistically independent. However, in many multiple-alternative forced-choice (MAFC) detection tasks, the target appears in one of M different locations within an image. If the image contains slow spatially varying luminance changes (low-pass noise), the pixel luminance values at the possible signal locations are correlated and therefore the model/human responses to the different locations might also be correlated. We investigate the effect of response correlations on model performance and compare different figures of merit for these conditions. Our results show that use of the standard d index of detectability assuming statistical independence can lead to erroneous underestimates of Pc and misleading comparisons of models. We introduce a novel figure of merit dr that takes into account response correlations and can be used to accurately estimate Pc. Furthermore, we show that dr can be readily related to the standard index of detectability d by dr=d/1-r, where r is the correlation between the responses in any MAFC detection task. We illustrate the use of the theory by computing figures of merit for two linear models detecting a signal in one of four locations within medical image backgrounds.

© 2000 Optical Society of America

OCIS Codes
(110.3000) Imaging systems : Image quality assessment
(330.1880) Vision, color, and visual optics : Detection
(330.4060) Vision, color, and visual optics : Vision modeling
(330.7310) Vision, color, and visual optics : Vision

History
Original Manuscript: January 4, 1999
Revised Manuscript: June 2, 1999
Manuscript Accepted: June 8, 1999
Published: February 1, 2000

Citation
Miguel P. Eckstein, Craig K. Abbey, and François O. Bochud, "Visual signal detection in structured backgrounds. IV. Figures of merit for model performance in multiple-alternative forced-choice detection tasks with correlated responses," J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 17, 206-217 (2000)
http://www.opticsinfobase.org/josaa/abstract.cfm?URI=josaa-17-2-206

You do not have subscription access to this journal. Citation lists with outbound citation links are available to subscribers only. You may subscribe either as an OSA member, or as an authorized user of your institution.

Contact your librarian or system administrator
or
Log in to access OSA Member Subscription

You do not have subscription access to this journal. Cited by links are available to subscribers only. You may subscribe either as an OSA member, or as an authorized user of your institution.

Contact your librarian or system administrator
or
Log in to access OSA Member Subscription

You do not have subscription access to this journal. Figure files are available to subscribers only. You may subscribe either as an OSA member, or as an authorized user of your institution.

Contact your librarian or system administrator
or
Log in to access OSA Member Subscription

You do not have subscription access to this journal. Article level metrics are available to subscribers only. You may subscribe either as an OSA member, or as an authorized user of your institution.

Contact your librarian or system administrator
or
Log in to access OSA Member Subscription

« Previous Article  |  Next Article »

OSA is a member of CrossRef.

CrossCheck Deposited