OSA's Digital Library

Journal of the Optical Society of America A

Journal of the Optical Society of America A

| OPTICS, IMAGE SCIENCE, AND VISION

  • Vol. 17, Iss. 3 — Mar. 1, 2000
  • pp: 415–424

Rotational-diversity phase estimation from differential-interference-contrast microscopy images

Chrysanthe Preza  »View Author Affiliations


JOSA A, Vol. 17, Issue 3, pp. 415-424 (2000)
http://dx.doi.org/10.1364/JOSAA.17.000415


View Full Text Article

Enhanced HTML    Acrobat PDF (466 KB)





Browse Journals / Lookup Meetings

Browse by Journal and Year


   


Lookup Conference Papers

Close Browse Journals / Lookup Meetings

Article Tools

Share
Citations

Abstract

An iterative phase-estimation method for the calculation of a specimen’s phase function or optical-path-length (OPL) distribution from differential-interference-contrast (DIC) microscopy images is presented. The method minimizes the least-squares discrepancy measure by use of the conjugate-gradient technique to estimate the phase function from multiple DIC images acquired at different specimen rotations. The estimate is regularized with a quadratic smoothness penalty. Results from testing the method with simulations and measured DIC images show improvement in the estimated phase when at least two rotationally diverse DIC images instead of a single DIC image are used for the estimation. The OPL of a cell that is estimated from two DIC images was found to be much more reliable than the OPL computed from single DIC images (which had a coefficient of variation equal to 15.8%).

© 2000 Optical Society of America

OCIS Codes
(100.3020) Image processing : Image reconstruction-restoration
(100.5070) Image processing : Phase retrieval
(100.6890) Image processing : Three-dimensional image processing
(180.6900) Microscopy : Three-dimensional microscopy

History
Original Manuscript: June 16, 1999
Revised Manuscript: October 21, 1999
Manuscript Accepted: October 29, 1999
Published: March 1, 2000

Citation
Chrysanthe Preza, "Rotational-diversity phase estimation from differential-interference-contrast microscopy images," J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 17, 415-424 (2000)
http://www.opticsinfobase.org/josaa/abstract.cfm?URI=josaa-17-3-415


Sort:  Author  |  Year  |  Journal  |  Reset  

References

  1. W. Lang, “Nomarski differential interference contrast microscopy II. Formation of the interference image,” Zeiss Inf. 17, 12–16 (1969).
  2. R. D. Allen, G. B. David, G. Nomarski, “The Zeiss–Nomarski differential interference equipment for transmitted-light microscopy,” Z. Wiss. Mikrosk. 69, 193–221 (1969). [PubMed]
  3. C. Preza, “Phase estimation using rotational diversity for differential interference contrast microscopy,” D.Sc. thesis (Washington University, Sever Institute of Technology, St. Louis, Mo., 1998).
  4. C. Preza, D. L. Snyder, J.-A. Conchello, “Theoretical development and experimental evaluation of imaging models for differential interference contrast microscopy,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 16, 2185–2199 (1999). [CrossRef]
  5. T. J. Holmes, W. J. Levy, “Signal-processing characteristics of differential-interference-contrast microscopy,” Appl. Opt. 26, 3929–3939 (1987). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. K. Dana, “Three dimensional reconstruction of the tectorial membrane: an image processing method using Nomarski differential interference contrast microscopy,” M.Sc. thesis (Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Mass., 1992).
  7. E. B. van Munster, L. J. van Vliet, J. A. Aten, “Reconstruction of optical pathlength distributions from images obtained by a wide-field differential interference contrast microscope,” J. Microsc. 188, 149–157 (1997). [CrossRef]
  8. E. B. van Munster, E. K. Winter, J. A. Aten, “Measurement-based evaluation of optical pathlength distributions reconstructed from simulated differential interference contrast images,” J. Microsc. 191, 170–177 (1998). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. R. G. Paxman, T. J. Schulz, J. R. Fienup, “Joint estimation of object and aberrations by using phase diversity,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 9, 1072–1085 (1992). [CrossRef]
  10. N. Baba, H. Tomita, N. Miura, “Iterative reconstruction method in phase-diversity imaging,” Appl. Opt. 33, 4428–4433 (1994). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. E. Lantz, “Retrieval of a phase-and-amplitude submicrometric object from images obtained in partially coherent microscopy,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 8, 791–800 (1991). [CrossRef]
  12. V. Y. Ivanov, V. P. Sivokon, M. A. Vorontsov, “Phase retrieval from a set of intensity measurements: theory and experiment,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 9, 1515–1524 (1992). [CrossRef]
  13. C. Preza, D. L. Snyder, F. U. Rosenberger, J. Markham, J.-A. Conchello, “Phase estimation from transmitted-light DIC images using rotational diversity,” in Image Reconstruction and Restoration II, T. Schulz, ed., Proc. SPIE3170, 97–107 (1997). [CrossRef]
  14. C. Preza, E. B. van Munster, A. A. Aten, D. L. Snyder, F. U. Rosenberger, “Determination of direction-independent optical path-length distribution of cells using rotational-diversity transmitted-light differential interference contrast (DIC) images,” in Three-Dimensional Microscopy: Image Acquisition and Processing V, C. J. Cogswell, J.-A. Conchello, T. Wilson, eds., Proc. SPIE3261, 60–70 (1998).
  15. I. Csiszár, “Why least squares and maximum entropy? An axiomatic approach to inference for linear inverse problems,” Ann. Stat. 19, 2032–2066 (1991). [CrossRef]
  16. D. L. Snyder, A. M. Hammoud, R. L. White, “Image recovery from data acquired with a charge-coupled-device camera,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 10, 1014–1023 (1993). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. D. L. Snyder, Random Point Processes (Wiley, New York, 1975).
  18. R. Fletcher, C. M. Reeves, “Function minimization by conjugate gradients,” Comput. J. (UK) 7, 149–154 (1964). [CrossRef]
  19. M. Aoki, Introduction to Optimization Techniques (Macmillan, New York, 1971).
  20. E. Polak, Computational Methods in Optimization (Academic, New York, 1971).
  21. A. N. Tikhonov, V. Y. Arsenin, Solutions of Ill-Posed Problems (Halsted, New York, 1977).
  22. T. M. Apostol, Calculus, 2nd ed. (Wiley, New York, 1969), Vol. 2.
  23. M. Pluta, Advanced Light Microscopy: Principles and Basic Properties (PWN-Polish Scientific, Warsaw, 1988).
  24. E. B. van Munster, J. Stap, R. A. Hoebe, G. J. T. Meerman, J. A. Aten, “Difference in volume of X- and Y-chromosome-bearing bovine sperm heads matches difference in DNA content,” Cytometry 35, 125–128 (1999). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

Cited By

Alert me when this paper is cited

OSA is able to provide readers links to articles that cite this paper by participating in CrossRef's Cited-By Linking service. CrossRef includes content from more than 3000 publishers and societies. In addition to listing OSA journal articles that cite this paper, citing articles from other participating publishers will also be listed.


« Previous Article  |  Next Article »

OSA is a member of CrossRef.

CrossCheck Deposited