OSA's Digital Library

Journal of the Optical Society of America A

Journal of the Optical Society of America A

| OPTICS, IMAGE SCIENCE, AND VISION

  • Vol. 17, Iss. 3 — Mar. 1, 2000
  • pp: 641–650

Spatial summation in human cone mechanisms from 0° to 20° in the superior retina

Vicki J. Volbrecht, Erin E. Shrago, Brooke E. Schefrin, and John S. Werner  »View Author Affiliations


JOSA A, Vol. 17, Issue 3, pp. 641-650 (2000)
http://dx.doi.org/10.1364/JOSAA.17.000641


View Full Text Article

Acrobat PDF (214 KB)





Browse Journals / Lookup Meetings

Browse by Journal and Year


   


Lookup Conference Papers

Close Browse Journals / Lookup Meetings

Article Tools

Share
Citations

Abstract

The maximum area of complete spatial summation (i.e., Ricco’s area) for human short-wavelength-sensitive- (S-) and long-wavelength-sensitive- (L-) cone mechanisms was measured psychophysically at the fovea and at 1.5°, 4°, 8°, and 20° along the vertical meridian in the superior retina. Increment thresholds were measured for three observers by a temporal two-alternative forced-choice procedure. Test stimuli ranging from -0.36 to 4.61 log area (min2) were presented on concentric 12.3° adapting and auxiliary fields, which isolated either an S- or an L-cone mechanism on the plateau of its respective threshold versus intensity function. Test flash durations were 50 and 10 ms for the S- and L-cone mechanisms, respectively. The data indicate that, from 0° to 20°, Ricco’s area increases monotonically for the L-cone mechanism, is variable for the S-cone mechanism, and is larger for the S-cone mechanism than for the L-cone mechanism for essentially all retinal locations. This pattern of results most likely reflects differences in ganglion cell density and changes in neural convergence with retinal eccentricity.

© 2000 Optical Society of America

OCIS Codes
(330.0330) Vision, color, and visual optics : Vision, color, and visual optics
(330.1720) Vision, color, and visual optics : Color vision
(330.5310) Vision, color, and visual optics : Vision - photoreceptors

History
Original Manuscript: July 6, 1999
Revised Manuscript: October 29, 1999
Manuscript Accepted: November 3, 1999
Published: March 1, 2000

Citation
Vicki J. Volbrecht, Erin E. Shrago, Brooke E. Schefrin, and John S. Werner, "Spatial summation in human cone mechanisms from 0° to 20° in the superior retina," J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 17, 641-650 (2000)
http://www.opticsinfobase.org/josaa/abstract.cfm?URI=josaa-17-3-641


Sort:  Author  |  Year  |  Journal  |  Reset

References

  1. A. Ricco, “Relazione fra il minimo angolo visuale l’intensita luminosa,” Mem. R. Accad. Sci. Lett. Arti Modena 17, 47–160 (1877).
  2. M. E. Wilson, “Invariant features of spatial summation with changing locus in the visual field,” J. Physiol. (London) 207, 611–622 (1970).
  3. I. Lie, “Visual detection and resolution as a function of retina locus,” Vision Res. 20, 967–974 (1980). [CrossRef]
  4. L. Spillmann, A. Ransom-Hogg, R. Oehler, “A comparison of perceptive and receptive fields in man and monkey,” Human Neurobiol. 6, 51–62 (1987).
  5. B. Fischer, “Overlap of receptive field centers and representation of the visual field in the cat’s optic tract,” Vision Res. 13, 2113–2120 (1973). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. B. E. Schefrin, M. L. Bieber, R. McLean, J. S. Werner, “The area of complete scotopic spatial summation enlarges with age,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 15, 340–348 (1998). [CrossRef]
  7. K. D. DaVila, W. S. Geisler, “The relative contributions of pre-neural and neural factors to areal summation in the fovea,” Vision Res. 31, 1369–1380 (1991). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. G. Wald, “Area and visual threshold,” J. Gen. Physiol. 21, 269–287 (1938). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. C. H. Graham, R. H. Brown, F. A. Mote, “The relation of size of stimulus and intensity in the human eye. I. Intensity thresholds for white light,” J. Exp. Psychol. 24, 555–573 (1939). [CrossRef]
  10. H. B. Barlow, “Temporal and spatial summation in human vision at different background intensities,” J. Physiol. (London) 141, 337–350 (1958).
  11. E. Baumgardt, B. Hillmann, “Duration and size as determinants of peripheral retinal response,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. 51, 340–344 (1961). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. P. E. Hallett, F. H. C. Marriott, F. C. Rodger, “The relationship of visual threshold to retinal position and area,” J. Physiol. (London) 160, 364–373 (1962).
  13. V. D. Glezer, “The receptive fields of the retina,” Vision Res. 5, 497–525 (1965). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. A. M. W. Scholtes, M. A. Bouman, “Psychophysical experiments on spatial summation at threshold level of the human peripheral retina,” Vision Res. 17, 867–873 (1977). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. G. S. Brindley, “The summation areas of human colour-receptive mechanisms at increment threshold,” J. Physiol. (London) 124, 400–408 (1954).
  16. F. Dannheim, S. M. Drance, “Studies of spatial summation of central retinal areas in normal people of all ages,” Can. J. Ophthalmol. 6, 311–319 (1971). [PubMed]
  17. T. Inui, O. Mimura, K. Kani, “Retinal sensitivity and spatial summation in the foveal and parafoveal regions,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. 71, 151–154 (1981). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. M. A. Johnson, “Color vision in the peripheral retina,” Am. J. Optom. Physiol. Opt. 63, 97–103 (1986). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. B. Sakitt, “Configuration dependence of scotopic spatial summation,” J. Physiol. (London) 216, 513–529 (1971).
  20. D. R. Williams, D. I. A. MacLeod, M. M. Hayhoe, “Punctate sensitivity of the blue-sensitive mechanism,” Vision Res. 21, 1357–1375 (1981). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  21. P. K. Ahnelt, H. Kolb, R. Pflug, “Identification of a subtype of cone photoreceptor, likely to be blue sensitive, in the human retina,” J. Comp. Neurol. 255, 18–34 (1987). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. C. A. Curcio, K. R. Sloan, R. E. Kalina, A. E. Hendrickson, “Human photoreceptor topography,” J. Comp. Neurol. 292, 497–523 (1990). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. C. A. Curcio, K. A. Allen, K. R. Sloan, C. L. Lerea, J. B. Hurley, I. B. Klock, A. H. Milam, “Distribution and morphology of human cone photoreceptors stained with anti-blue opsin,” J. Comp. Neurol. 312, 610–624 (1991). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. C. M. Cicerone, J. L. Nerger, “The relative numbers of long-wavelength-sensitive to middle-wavelength-sensitive cones in the human fovea centralis,” Vision Res. 29, 115–128 (1989). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. J. L. Nerger, C. M. Cicerone, “The ratio of L cones to M cones in the human parafoveal retina,” Vision Res. 32, 879–888 (1992). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. R. L. P. Vimal, J. Pokorny, V. C. Smith, S. K. Shevell, “Foveal cone thresholds,” Vision Res. 29, 61–78 (1989). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. S. A. Hagstrom, J. Neitz, M. Neitz, “Variations in cone populations for red–green color vision examined by analysis of mRNA,” NeuroReport 9, 1963–1967 (1998). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. A. Roorda, D. R. Williams, “The arrangement of the three cone classes in the living human eye,” Nature 397, 520–522 (1999). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. The term B/Y bistratified ganglion cell is used throughout the paper because it is convenient in anatomy. This nomenclature does not imply that these ganglion cells are responsible for the perception of blue and yellow hues.
  30. D. M. Dacey, B. B. Lee, “The ‘blue-on’ opponent pathway in primate retina originates from a distinct bistratified ganglion cell type,” Nature 367, 731–735 (1994). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  31. D. M. Dacey, “Physiology, morphology and spatial densities of identified ganglion cells types in primate retina,” in Higher-Order Processing in the Visual System, G. R. Bock, J. A. Goode, eds. (Wiley, New York, 1994), pp. 12–34.
  32. D. J. Calkins, Y. Tsukamoto, P. Sterling, “Microcircuitry and mosaic of a blue–yellow ganglion cell in the primate retina,” J. Neurosci. 18, 3373–3385 (1998). [PubMed]
  33. H. Wässle, U. Grünert, J. Röhrenbeck, B. B. Boycott, “Cortical magnification factor and the ganglion cell density of the primate retina,” Nature 341, 643–646 (1989). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. C. A. Curcio, K. A. Allen, “Topography of ganglion cells in human retina,” J. Comp. Neurol. 300, 5–25 (1990). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. D. J. Calkins, P. Sterling, “Evidence that circuits for spatial and color vision segregate at the first retinal synapse,” Neuron 24, 313–321 (1999). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. M. L. Bieber, B. E. Schefrin, J. S. Werner, “The senescence of cone photoreceptor sensitivity at 0°, 4°, and 8° retinal eccentricity and the possible relation to macular pigment density,” Invest. Ophthalmol. Visual Sci. Suppl. 39, S163 (1998).
  37. P. DeMarco, J. Pokorny, V. C. Smith, “Full-spectrum cone sensitivity functions for X-chromosome-linked anomalous trichromats,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 9, 1465–1476 (1992). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. T.v.i. functions were also measured at 4°, 8°, and 20° retinal eccentricities. The peripheral functions confirmed that the thresholds measured at the selected background intensity were on the plateau of the t.v.i. function. Test sensitivity functions were also measured at 20° retinal eccentricity under conditions that isolated the S-cone and L-cone mechanisms. As in the fovea, the 20° test sensitivity functions verified the isolation of S- and L-cone mechanisms.
  39. G. Westheimer, “The Maxwellian view,” Vision Res. 6, 669–682 (1966). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  40. H. Levitt, “Transformed up–down methods in psychoacoustics,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 49, 467–477 (1970). [CrossRef]
  41. F. M. de Monasterio, E. P. McCrane, J. K. Newlander, S. J. Schein, “Density profile of blue-sensitive cones along the horizontal meridian of macaque retina,” Invest. Ophthalmol. 26, 289–302 (1985).
  42. R. E. Bedford, G. Wyszecki, “Axial chromatic aberration of the human eye,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. 47, 564–565 (1957). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. P. A. Howarth, A. Bradley, “The longitudinal chromatic aberration of the human eye, and its correction,” Vision Res. 26, 361–366 (1986). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. I. Powell, “Lenses for correcting chromatic aberration of the eye,” Appl. Opt. 20, 4152–4155 (1981). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. J. Krauskopf, “Further measurements of human retinal images,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. 54, 715–716 (1964). [CrossRef]
  46. W. N. Charman, J. A. M. Jennings, “The optical quality of the monochromatic retinal image as a function of focus,” Br. J. Physiol. Opt. 31, 119–134 (1976). [PubMed]
  47. R. W. Gubisch, “Optical performance of the human eye,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. 57, 407–415 (1967). [CrossRef]
  48. F. W. Campbell, R. W. Gubisch, “Optical quality of the human eye,” J. Physiol. (London) 186, 558–578 (1966).
  49. J. A. M. Jennings, W. N. Charman, “Optical image quality in the peripheral retina,” Am. J. Optom. Physiol. Opt. 55, 582–590 (1978). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  50. R. Navarro, P. Artal, D. R. Williams, “Modulation transfer of the human eye as a function of retinal eccentricity,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 10, 201–212 (1993). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  51. Ahnelt and colleagues (Ref. 21) did not provide an estimate of cone density at 4° and 8° retinal eccentricities. The 10° estimate for S and L cones has been included to show that the density of cones does not change from 10° to 20° retinal eccentricity. Although Curcio et al.23 did not extend their S-cone measurements beyond 8°, in an earlier paper Curcio et al.22 showed that total cone density remained relatively constant from 8° and beyond. Based on this finding, the 20° values were assumed to be the same as the density values at 8° retinal eccentricity. The mean cone density values across retinal quadrants from Curcio et al.22,23 were used in Fig. 6. Ahnelt et al.21 investigated only the temporal quadrant. The numbers of L cones from both studies were derived with the assumption of an L:M cone ratio of 2:1.24,25 If other estimates (e.g., Refs. 26–28) of the L:M cone ratio had been used, the L-cone density function would have shifted only along the y axis. This scalar shift would not affect the analyses presented in Fig. 6 and Table 1.
  52. B. B. Lee, “Receptive field structure in the primate retina,” Vision Res. 36, 631–644 (1996). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Retinal eccentricity values were obtained for ganglion cell density values within 8° of the fovea by use of the correction factor for ganglion cell displacement.54 The ganglion cell density values represent mean values across retinal quadrants. The 0° and 1.5° midget ganglion cell density values were derived from L-cone density values with the assumption of a 2:1 L:M cone ratio. If a different L:M ratio were used, the conclusions drawn from Fig. 7 would not change.
  54. D. M. Dacey, “Morphology of a small-field bistratified ganglion cells type in the macaque and human retina,” Visual Neurosci. 10, 1081–1098 (1993). [CrossRef]
  55. B. A. Wandell, E. N. Pugh, “A field-additive pathway detects brief-duration, long-wavelength incremental flashes,” Vision Res. 20, 613–624 (1980). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  56. P. E. King-Smith, D. Carden, “Luminance and opponent-color contributions to visual detection and adaptation and to temporal and spatial integration,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. 66, 709–717 (1976). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  57. B. A. Wandell, E. N. Pugh, “Detection of long-duration, long wavelength incremental flashes by a chromatically coded pathway,” Vision Res. 20, 625–636 (1980). [CrossRef]
  58. D. M. Dacey, M. R. Petersen, “Dendritic field size and morphology of midget and parasol ganglion cells of the human retina,” Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 89, 9666–9670 (1992). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

Cited By

Alert me when this paper is cited

OSA is able to provide readers links to articles that cite this paper by participating in CrossRef's Cited-By Linking service. CrossRef includes content from more than 3000 publishers and societies. In addition to listing OSA journal articles that cite this paper, citing articles from other participating publishers will also be listed.


« Previous Article

OSA is a member of CrossRef.

CrossCheck Deposited