OSA's Digital Library

Journal of the Optical Society of America A

Journal of the Optical Society of America A

| OPTICS, IMAGE SCIENCE, AND VISION

  • Vol. 17, Iss. 6 — Jun. 1, 2000
  • pp: 955–965

Corneal wave aberration from videokeratography: accuracy and limitations of the procedure

Antonio Guirao and Pablo Artal  »View Author Affiliations


JOSA A, Vol. 17, Issue 6, pp. 955-965 (2000)
http://dx.doi.org/10.1364/JOSAA.17.000955


View Full Text Article

Acrobat PDF (375 KB)





Browse Journals / Lookup Meetings

Browse by Journal and Year


   


Lookup Conference Papers

Close Browse Journals / Lookup Meetings

Article Tools

Share
Citations

Abstract

A procedure to calculate the wave aberration of the human cornea from its surface shape measured by videokeratography is presented. The wave aberration was calculated as the difference in optical path between the marginal rays and the chief ray refracted at the surface, for both on- and off-axis objects. The corneal shape elevation map was obtained from videokeratography and fitted to a Zernike polynomial expansion through a Gram–Schmidt orthogonalization. The wave aberration was obtained also as a Zernike polynomial representation. The accuracy of the procedure was analyzed. For calibrated reference surface elevations, a root-mean-square error (RMSE) of 1 to 2 μm for an aperture 4–6 mm in diameter was obtained, and the RMSE associated with the experimental errors and with the fitting method was 0.2 μm. The procedure permits estimation of the corneal wave aberration from videokeratoscopic data with an accuracy of 0.05–0.2 μm for a pupil 4–6 mm in diameter, rendering the method adequate for many applications.

© 2000 Optical Society of America

OCIS Codes
(080.1010) Geometric optics : Aberrations (global)
(330.4460) Vision, color, and visual optics : Ophthalmic optics and devices
(330.5370) Vision, color, and visual optics : Physiological optics
(330.7310) Vision, color, and visual optics : Vision

Citation
Antonio Guirao and Pablo Artal, "Corneal wave aberration from videokeratography: accuracy and limitations of the procedure," J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 17, 955-965 (2000)
http://www.opticsinfobase.org/josaa/abstract.cfm?URI=josaa-17-6-955


Sort:  Author  |  Year  |  Journal  |  Reset

References

  1. P. Artal and A. Guirao, “Contributions of the cornea and the lens to the aberrations of the human eye,” Opt. Lett. 23, 1713–1715 (1998).
  2. H. L. Liou and N. Brennan, “Anatomically accurate, finite model eye for optical modeling,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 14, 1684–1695 (1997).
  3. J. Schwiegerling and J. E. Greivenkamp, “Keratoconus detection based on videokeratoscopic height data,” Optom. Vision Sci. 73, 721–728 (1996).
  4. J. Schwiegerling, “Cone dimensions in keratoconus using Zernike polynomials,” Optom. Vision Sci. 74, 963–969 (1997).
  5. R. D. Applegate, G. Hilmantel, and H. C. Howland, “Corneal aberrations increase with the magnitude of radial keratotomy refractive correction,” Optom. Vision Sci. 73, 585–589 (1996).
  6. K. M. Oliver, G. P. Hemenger, M. C. Corbett, D. P. S. Obrant, S. Verna, J. Marshall, and A. Tomlinson, “Corneal optical aberrations induced by photorefractive keratoctomy,” J. Refrac. Surg. 13, 246–254 (1997).
  7. S. G. El Hage and F. Berny, “Contribution of the crystalline lens to the spherical aberration of the eye,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. 63, 205–211 (1973).
  8. A. Tomlinson, R. P. Hemenger, and R. Garriott, “Method for estimating the spherical aberration of the human crystalline lens in vivo,” Invest. Ophthalmol. Visual Sci. 34, 621–629 (1993).
  9. P. M. Kiely, G. Smith, and L. G. Carney, “The mean shape of the human cornea,” Opt. Acta 29, 1027–1040 (1982).
  10. T. C. A. Jenkins, “Aberrations of the eye and their effects on vision: part 1,” Br. J. Physiol. Opt. 20, 59–91 (1963).
  11. R. P. Hemenger, A. Tomlinson, and K. Oliver, “Optical consequences of asymmetries in normal corneas,” Ophthalmic Physiol. Opt. 16, 124–129 (1996).
  12. T. W. Raasch, “Corneal topography and irregular astigmatism,” Optom. Vision Sci. 72, 809–815 (1995).
  13. R. A. Applegate, R. Nuñez, J. Buettner, and H. C. Howland, “How accurately can videokeratographic systems measure surface elevation?” Optom. Vision Sci. 72, 785–792 (1995).
  14. J. E. Greivenkamp, M. D. Mellinger, R. W. Snyder, J. T. Schwiegerling, A. E. Lowman, and J. M. Miller, “Comparison of three videokeratoscopes in measurements of toric tests surfaces,” J. Refract. Surg. 12, 229–239 (1996).
  15. R. L. Schultze, “Accuracy of corneal elevation with four corneal topography systems,” J. Refract. Surg. 14, 100–104 (1998).
  16. J. Schwiegerling and J. E. Greivenkamp, “Using corneal height maps and polynomial decomposition to determine corneal aberrations,” Optom. Vision Sci. 74, 906–916 (1997).
  17. V. N. Mahajan, Aberration Theory Made Simple (SPIE Optical Engineering Press, Bellingham, Wash., 1991).
  18. The Taylor expansion of a function with three variables is given by f(x)=Σk=0(1/k!)f(k)(x0), with x=(X, Y, Z), x0=(0, 0, 0), and f(k)(x)=(x∇)kf(x).
  19. T. O. Salmon and D. G. Horner, “Comparison of elevation, curvature, and power descriptors for corneal topographic mapping,” Optom. Vision Sci. 72, 800–808 (1995).
  20. J. Y. Wang and D. E. Silva, “Wave-front interpretation with Zernike polynomials,” Appl. Opt. 19, 1510–1518 (1980).
  21. M. Born and E. Wolf, Principles of Optics (Pergamon, New York, 1985).
  22. J. Schwiegerling, J. E. Greivenkamp, and J. M. Miller, “Representation of videokeratoscopic height data with Zernike polynomials,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 12, 2105–2113 (1995).
  23. C-J. Kim and R. R. Shannon, “Catalog of Zernike polynomials,” in Applied Optics and Optical Engineering, R. R. Shannon and J. C. Wyant, eds. (Academic, San Diego, Calif., 1987), Vol. X, Chap. 4. (Note that the ordering of the polynomials in the list is not universally accepted; here we used a different ordering.)
  24. D. Malacara, J. M. Carpio-Valadéz, and J. J. Sánchez-Mondragón, “Wavefront fitting with discrete orthogonal polynomials in a unit radius circle,” Opt. Eng. 29, 672–675 (1990).
  25. S. N. Bezdid’ko, “Calculation of the Strehl coefficient and determination of the best-focus plane in the case of polychromatic light,” Sov. J. Opt. Technol. 42, 514–516 (1975).
  26. G. Conforti, “Zernike aberration coefficients from Seidel and higher-order power-series coefficients,” Opt. Lett. 8, 407–408 (1983).
  27. R. K. Tyson, “Conversion of Zernike aberration coefficients to Seidel and higher-order power-series aberration coefficients,” Opt. Lett. 7, 262–264 (1982).
  28. C. Campbell, “Reconstruction of the corneal shape with the MasterVue corneal topography system,” Optom. Vision Sci. 74, 899–905 (1997).
  29. By comparing Eqs. (9) and (5), we can calculate the curvature and asphericity from the Zernike coefficients as R= r02 2(2∛a4−6 5 a9−30 7 a22+...), K2= 8R3 r04 (6 5 a9−30 7 a22+...), where r0 is the maximum radial extent of the surface.
  30. J. W. Goodman, Introduction to Fourier Optics, 2nd ed. (McGraw-Hill, New York, 1996).
  31. R. P. Hemenger, A. Tomlinson, and K. Oliver, “Corneal optics from videokeratographs,” Ophthalmic Physiol. Opt. 15, 63–68 (1995).
  32. R. A. Applegate, H. C. Howland, J. Buettner, A. J. Cottingham, Jr., R. P. Sharp, and R. W. Yee, “Radial keratotomy (RK), corneal aberrations and visual performance,” Invest. Ophthalmol. Visual Sci. 36, S309 (1995).
  33. I. Iglesias, E. Berrio, and P. Artal, “Estimates of the ocular wave aberration from pairs of double-pass retinal images,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 15, 2466–2476 (1998).

Cited By

Alert me when this paper is cited

OSA is able to provide readers links to articles that cite this paper by participating in CrossRef's Cited-By Linking service. CrossRef includes content from more than 3000 publishers and societies. In addition to listing OSA journal articles that cite this paper, citing articles from other participating publishers will also be listed.


« Previous Article  |  Next Article »

OSA is a member of CrossRef.

CrossCheck Deposited