OSA's Digital Library

Journal of the Optical Society of America A

Journal of the Optical Society of America A

| OPTICS, IMAGE SCIENCE, AND VISION

  • Vol. 17, Iss. 6 — Jun. 1, 2000
  • pp: 974–985

Laser Ray Tracing versus Hartmann–Shack sensor for measuring optical aberrations in the human eye

Esther Moreno-Barriuso and Rafael Navarro  »View Author Affiliations


JOSA A, Vol. 17, Issue 6, pp. 974-985 (2000)
http://dx.doi.org/10.1364/JOSAA.17.000974


View Full Text Article

Enhanced HTML    Acrobat PDF (526 KB)





Browse Journals / Lookup Meetings

Browse by Journal and Year


   


Lookup Conference Papers

Close Browse Journals / Lookup Meetings

Article Tools

Share
Citations

Abstract

A comparison and validation study of Laser Ray Tracing (LRT) and Hartmann–Shack wave-front-sensor (to be referred to as H–S) methods was carried out on both artificial and human eyes. The aim of this work was double. First, we wanted to verify experimentally the equivalence of single- and double-pass measurements for both H–S and LRT. This interest is due to the impossibility of making single-pass measurements in human eyes. In addition, we wanted to validate the LRT technique by comparing it with the H–S wave-front sensor, currently used in many physiological optics laboratories. Comparison of the different methods and configurations carried out in the artificial eye yielded basically the same results in all cases, which means a reciprocal validation of both LRT and H–S, in either single- or double-pass configurations. Other aspects, such as robustness against speckle noise or the influence of the size of the entrance (H–S) or exit (LRT) pupil were studied as well. As a global reference, the point-spread function (PSF) of the artificial eye was recorded directly on a CCD camera and compared with simulated PSF’s computed from the experimental aberration data. We also applied these two methods to real eyes (double pass), finding again a close match between the resulting aberration coefficients and also between the standard errors for two normal subjects. However, for one myopic eye with an especially low optical quality (RMS wave-front error >2 μm) and asymmetric aberrations, the array of spots recorded with the H–S sensor was highly distorted and too difficult to analyze.

© 2000 Optical Society of America

OCIS Codes
(330.4300) Vision, color, and visual optics : Vision system - noninvasive assessment
(330.5370) Vision, color, and visual optics : Physiological optics

History
Original Manuscript: November 2, 1999
Manuscript Accepted: February 7, 2000
Published: June 1, 2000

Citation
Esther Moreno-Barriuso and Rafael Navarro, "Laser Ray Tracing versus Hartmann–Shack sensor for measuring optical aberrations in the human eye," J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 17, 974-985 (2000)
http://www.opticsinfobase.org/josaa/abstract.cfm?URI=josaa-17-6-974

You do not have subscription access to this journal. Citation lists with outbound citation links are available to subscribers only. You may subscribe either as an OSA member, or as an authorized user of your institution.

Contact your librarian or system administrator
or
Log in to access OSA Member Subscription

You do not have subscription access to this journal. Cited by links are available to subscribers only. You may subscribe either as an OSA member, or as an authorized user of your institution.

Contact your librarian or system administrator
or
Log in to access OSA Member Subscription

You do not have subscription access to this journal. Figure files are available to subscribers only. You may subscribe either as an OSA member, or as an authorized user of your institution.

Contact your librarian or system administrator
or
Log in to access OSA Member Subscription

You do not have subscription access to this journal. Article level metrics are available to subscribers only. You may subscribe either as an OSA member, or as an authorized user of your institution.

Contact your librarian or system administrator
or
Log in to access OSA Member Subscription

« Previous Article  |  Next Article »

OSA is a member of CrossRef.

CrossCheck Deposited