OSA's Digital Library

Journal of the Optical Society of America A

Journal of the Optical Society of America A


  • Vol. 17, Iss. 8 — Aug. 1, 2000
  • pp: 1361–1370

Spectral sharpening with positivity

Mark S. Drew and Graham D. Finlayson  »View Author Affiliations

JOSA A, Vol. 17, Issue 8, pp. 1361-1370 (2000)

View Full Text Article

Enhanced HTML    Acrobat PDF (224 KB)

Browse Journals / Lookup Meetings

Browse by Journal and Year


Lookup Conference Papers

Close Browse Journals / Lookup Meetings

Article Tools



Spectral sharpening is a method for developing camera or other optical-device sensor functions that are more narrowband than those in hardware, by means of a linear transform of sensor functions. The utility of such a transform is that many computer vision and color-correction algorithms perform better in a sharpened space, and thus such a space can be used as an intermediate representation for carrying out calculations. In this paper we consider how one may sharpen sensor functions such that the transformed sensors are all positive. We show that constrained optimization can be used to produce positive sensors in two fundamentally different ways: by constraining the coefficients in the transform or by constraining the functions directly. In the former method, we prove that convexity can be used to constrain the solution exactly. In a sense, we are continuing the work of MacAdam and of Pearson and Yule, who formed positive combinations of the color-matching functions. However, the advantage of the spectral sharpening approach is that not only can we produce positive curves, but the process is “steerable” in that we can produce positive curves with as good or better properties for sharpening within a given set of sharpening intervals. At base, however, it is positive colors in the transformed space that are the prime objective. Therefore we also carry out sharpening of sensor curves governed not by positivity of the curves themselves but of colors resulting from them. Curves that result have negative lobes but generate positive colors. We find that this type of constrained sharpening generates the best results, which are almost as good as for unconstrained sharpening but without the penalty of negative colors. All methods discussed may be used with any number of sensors.

© 2000 Optical Society of America

OCIS Codes
(040.1490) Detectors : Cameras
(330.1690) Vision, color, and visual optics : Color
(330.1710) Vision, color, and visual optics : Color, measurement
(330.1720) Vision, color, and visual optics : Color vision
(330.1730) Vision, color, and visual optics : Colorimetry

Original Manuscript: May 19, 1999
Revised Manuscript: January 19, 2000
Manuscript Accepted: January 19, 2000
Published: August 1, 2000

Mark S. Drew and Graham D. Finlayson, "Spectral sharpening with positivity," J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 17, 1361-1370 (2000)

Sort:  Author  |  Year  |  Journal  |  Reset  


  1. G. D. Finlayson, M. S. Drew, B. V. Funt, “Spectral sharpening: sensor transformations for improved color constancy,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 11, 1553–1563 (1994). [CrossRef]
  2. K. Barnard, B. V. Funt, “Experiments in sensor sharpening for color constancy,” in 6th Color Imaging Conference: Color, Science, Systems and Applications (Society for Imaging Science & Technology/Society for Information Display, Springfield, Va., 1998), pp. 43–46.
  3. M. S. Drew, M. H. Brill, “Color from shape from color: a simple formalism with known light sources,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 17, 1371–1381 (2000). [CrossRef]
  4. B. V. Funt, G. D. Finlayson, “Color constant color indexing,” IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 17, 522–529 (1995). [CrossRef]
  5. M. L. Pearson, J. A. Yule, “Transformations of color mixture functions without negative portions,” J. Color Appearance 2, 30–35 (1973). Inspiration for their work is attributed to MacAdam.
  6. P. L. Vora, J. E. Farrell, J. D. Tietz, D. H. Brainard, “Digital color cameras. 2. spectral response,” (Hewlett–Packard Laboratories, Palo Alto, Calif., 1997). http://www.hpl.hp.com/techreports/97/HPL-97-54.html .
  7. G. D. Finlayson, B. V. Funt, “Coefficient channels: derivation and relationship to other theoretical studies,” Color Res. Appl. 21, 87–96 (1996). [CrossRef]
  8. M. H. Brill, G. D. Finlayson, P. M. Hubel, W. Thornton, “Prime wavelengths and color imaging,” in 6th Color Imaging Conference: Color, Science, Systems and Applications (Society for Imaging Science & Technology/Society for Information Display, Springfield, Va., 1998), pp. 33–42.
  9. P. E. Gill, W. Murray, M. H. Wright, Practical Optimization (Academic, New York, 1981).
  10. S. M. Newhall, D. Nickerson, D. B. Judd, “Final report of the OSA subcommittee on the spacing of the Munsell colors,” J. Opt. Soc. Am.33, 385–418 (1943). [CrossRef]
  11. M. J. Vrhel, R. Gershon, L. S. Iwan, “Measurement and analysis of object reflectance spectra,” Color Res. Appl. 19, 4–9 (1994).
  12. G. Wyszecki, W. S. Stiles, Color Science: Concepts and Methods, Quantitative Data and Formulas, 2nd ed. (Wiley, New York, 1982).
  13. D. A. Forsyth, “A novel approach to color constancy,” in Proceedings of the International Conference on Computer Vision ’88 (IEEE Computer Society Press, Los Alamitos, Calif., 1998), pp. 9–18.
  14. G. D. Finlayson, “Color in perspective,” IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 18, 1034–1038 (1996). [CrossRef]

Cited By

Alert me when this paper is cited

OSA is able to provide readers links to articles that cite this paper by participating in CrossRef's Cited-By Linking service. CrossRef includes content from more than 3000 publishers and societies. In addition to listing OSA journal articles that cite this paper, citing articles from other participating publishers will also be listed.

Next Article »

OSA is a member of CrossRef.

CrossCheck Deposited