OSA's Digital Library

Journal of the Optical Society of America A

Journal of the Optical Society of America A

| OPTICS, IMAGE SCIENCE, AND VISION

  • Vol. 18, Iss. 1 — Jan. 1, 2001
  • pp: 49–54

Coherent use of opposing lenses for axial resolution increase. II. Power and limitation of nonlinear image restoration

Matthias Nagorni and Stefan W. Hell  »View Author Affiliations


JOSA A, Vol. 18, Issue 1, pp. 49-54 (2001)
http://dx.doi.org/10.1364/JOSAA.18.000049


View Full Text Article

Acrobat PDF (271 KB)





Browse Journals / Lookup Meetings

Browse by Journal and Year


   


Lookup Conference Papers

Close Browse Journals / Lookup Meetings

Article Tools

Share
Citations

Abstract

We analyze the ability of nonlinear image restoration to remove interference artifacts in microscopes that enlarge the axial optical bandwidth through coherent counterpropagating waves. We calculate the images of an elaborate test object as produced by confocal, standing-wave, incoherent illumination interference image interference, and 4Pi confocal microscopes, and we subsequently investigate the extent to which the initial object can be restored by the information allowed by their optical transfer function. We find that nonlinear restoration is successful only if the transfer function is sufficiently contiguous and has amplitudes well above the noise level, as is mostly the case in a two-photon excitation 4Pi confocal microscope.

© 2001 Optical Society of America

OCIS Codes
(100.1830) Image processing : Deconvolution
(100.3020) Image processing : Image reconstruction-restoration
(110.4850) Imaging systems : Optical transfer functions
(180.1790) Microscopy : Confocal microscopy
(180.2520) Microscopy : Fluorescence microscopy
(180.6900) Microscopy : Three-dimensional microscopy

Citation
Matthias Nagorni and Stefan W. Hell, "Coherent use of opposing lenses for axial resolution increase. II. Power and limitation of nonlinear image restoration," J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 18, 49-54 (2001)
http://www.opticsinfobase.org/josaa/abstract.cfm?URI=josaa-18-1-49


Sort:  Author  |  Year  |  Journal  |  Reset

References

  1. F. Lanni, Applications of Fluorescence in the Biomedical Sciences, 1st ed. (Liss, New York, 1986).
  2. B. Bailey, D. L. Farkas, D. L. Taylor, and F. Lanni, “Enhancement of axial resolution in fluorescence microscopy by standing-wave excitation,” Nature (London) 366, 44–48 (1993).
  3. S. W. Hell, “Double-scanning microscope,” European patent 0491289 (December 18, 1990).
  4. S. Hell and E. H. K. Stelzer, “Properties of a 4Pi-confocal fluorescence microscope,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 9, 2159–2166 (1992).
  5. M. G. L. Gustafsson, D. A. Agard, and J. W. Sedat, “Sevenfold improvement of axial resolution in 3D widefield microscopy using two objective lenses,” in Three-Dimensional Microscopy : Image Acquisition and Processing II, T. Wilson, and C. J. Cogswell, eds., Proc. SPIE 2412, 147–156 (1995).
  6. M. G. L. Gustafsson, D. A. Agard, and J. W. Sedat, “I5M: 3D widefield light microscopy with better than 100 nm axial resolution,” J. Microsc. (Oxford) 195, 10–16 (1999).
  7. M. Nagorni and S. W. Hell, “Coherent use of opposing lenses for axial resolution increase in fluorescence microscopy. I. Comparative study of concepts,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 18, 36–48 (2001).
  8. V. Krishnamurthi, B. Bailey, and F. Lanni, “Image processing in 3-D standing wave fluorescence microscopy,” in Three-Dimensional Microscopy: Image Acquisition and Processing III, C. J. Cogswell, G. S. Kino, and T. Wilson, eds., Proc. SPIE 2655, 18–25 (1996).
  9. M. Gu and C. J. R. Sheppard, “Three-dimensional transfer functions in 4Pi confocal microscopes,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 11, 1619–1627 (1994).
  10. B. R. Frieden, “Restoring with maximum likelihood and maximum entropy,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. 62, 511–518 (1972).
  11. W. H. Richardson, “Bayesian-based iterative method of image restoration,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. 62, 55–59 (1972).
  12. L. B. Lucy, “An iterative technique for the rectification of observed distributions,” Astron. J. 79, 745–754 (1974).
  13. T. J. Holmes, “Maximum-likelihood image restoration adapted for non-coherent optical imaging,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 5, 666–673 (1988).
  14. T. J. Holmes, “Expectation–maximization restoration of band-limited, truncated point-process intensities with application in microscopy,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 6, 1006–1014 (1989).
  15. D. L. Snyder, T. J. Schutz, and J. A. O’Sullivan, “Deblurring subject to nonnegative constraints,” IEEE Trans. Signal Process. 40, 1143–1150 (1992).
  16. G. M. P. Van Kempen, L. J. Van Vliet, P. J. Verveer, and H. T. M. van der Voort, “A quantitative comparison of image restoration methods for confocal microscopy,” J. Microsc. (Oxford) 185, 354–365 (1997).
  17. J.-A. Conchello and J. G. McNally, “Fast regularization technique for expectation maximization algorithm for optical sectioning microscopy,” in Three-Dimensional Microscopy: Image Acquisition and Processing III, C. J. Cogswell, G. S. Kino, and T. Wilson, eds., Proc. SPIE 2655, 199–208 (1996).
  18. I. Csiszar, “Why least squares and maximum entropy? An axiomatic approach to inference for linear inverse problems,” Ann. Stat. 19, 2032–2066 (1991).
  19. M. Schrader, K. Bahlmann, G. Giese, and S. W. Hell, “4Pi-confocal imaging in fixed biological specimens,” Biophys. J. 75, 1659–1668 (1998).

Cited By

Alert me when this paper is cited

OSA is able to provide readers links to articles that cite this paper by participating in CrossRef's Cited-By Linking service. CrossRef includes content from more than 3000 publishers and societies. In addition to listing OSA journal articles that cite this paper, citing articles from other participating publishers will also be listed.


« Previous Article  |  Next Article »

OSA is a member of CrossRef.

CrossCheck Deposited