OSA's Digital Library

Journal of the Optical Society of America A

Journal of the Optical Society of America A

| OPTICS, IMAGE SCIENCE, AND VISION

  • Vol. 18, Iss. 10 — Oct. 1, 2001
  • pp: 2539–2547

Methods for correcting tilt anisoplanatism in laser-guide-star-based multiconjugate adaptive optics

Brent L. Ellerbroek and François Rigaut  »View Author Affiliations


JOSA A, Vol. 18, Issue 10, pp. 2539-2547 (2001)
http://dx.doi.org/10.1364/JOSAA.18.002539


View Full Text Article

Acrobat PDF (174 KB)





Browse Journals / Lookup Meetings

Browse by Journal and Year


   


Lookup Conference Papers

Close Browse Journals / Lookup Meetings

Article Tools

Share
Citations

Abstract

Multiconjugate adaptive optics (MCAO) is a technique for correcting turbulence-induced phase distortions in three dimensions instead of two, thereby greatly expanding the corrected field of view of an adaptive optics system. This is accomplished with use of multiple deformable mirrors conjugate to distinct ranges in the atmosphere, with actuator commands computed from wave-front sensor (WFS) measurements from multiple guide stars. Laser guide stars (LGSs) must be used (at least for the forseeable future) to achieve a useful degree of sky coverage in an astronomical MCAO system. Much as a single LGS cannot be used to measure overall wave-front tilt, a constellation of multiple LGSs at a common range cannot detect tilt anisoplanatism. This error alone will significantly degrade the performance of a MCAO system based on a single tilt-only natural guide star (NGS) and multiple tilt-removed LGSs at a common altitude. We present a heuristic, low-order model for the principal source of tilt anisoplanatism that suggests four possible approaches to eliminating this defect in LGS MCAO: (i) tip/tilt measurements from multiple NGS, (ii) a solution to the LGS tilt uncertainty problem, (iii) additional higher-order WFS measurements from a single NGS, or (iv) higher-order WFS measurements from both sodium and Rayleigh LGSs at different ranges. Sample numerical results for one particular MCAO system configuration indicate that approach (ii), if feasible, would provide the highest degree of tilt anisoplanatism compensation. Approaches (i) and (iv) also provide very useful levels of performance and do not require unrealistically low levels of WFS measurement noise. For a representative set of parameters for an 8-m telescope, the additional laser power required for approach (iv) is on the order of 2 W per Rayleigh LGS.

© 2001 Optical Society of America

OCIS Codes
(010.1080) Atmospheric and oceanic optics : Active or adaptive optics
(010.7350) Atmospheric and oceanic optics : Wave-front sensing

Citation
Brent L. Ellerbroek and François Rigaut, "Methods for correcting tilt anisoplanatism in laser-guide-star-based multiconjugate adaptive optics," J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 18, 2539-2547 (2001)
http://www.opticsinfobase.org/josaa/abstract.cfm?URI=josaa-18-10-2539


Sort:  Author  |  Year  |  Journal  |  Reset

References

  1. J. M. Beckers, “Increasing the size of the isoplanatic patch with multiconjugate adaptive optics,” in ESO Conference on Very Large Telescopes and Their Instrumentation, M. H. Ulrich, ed. (European Southern Observatory, Garching, Germany, 1988), Vol. 2, pp. 693–703.
  2. B. L. Ellerbroek, “First-order performance evaluation of adaptive-optics systems for atmospheric turbulence compensation in extended-field-of-view astronomical telescopes,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 11, 783–805 (1994).
  3. E. Viard, N. N. Hubin, M. Le Louarn, and A. A. Tokovinin, “Concept and performance of multiple laser guide stars for 8m class telescopes,” in Adaptive Optical Systems Technology, P. Wizinowich, ed., Proc. SPIE 4007, 94–105 (2000).
  4. R. Flicker, B. L. Ellerbroek, and F. J. Rigaut, “Comparison of multiconjugate adaptive optics configurations and control algorithms for the Gemini-South 8m telescope,” in Adaptive Optical Systems Technology, P. Wizinowich, ed., Proc. SPIE 4007, 1032–1043 (2000).
  5. F. J. Rigaut, B. L. Ellerbroek, and R. Flicker, “Principles, limitations, and performance of multi-conjugate adaptive optics,” in Adaptive Optical Systems Technology, P. Wizinowich, ed., Proc. SPIE 4007, 1022–1031 (2000).
  6. R. Ragazzoni, “Adaptive optics for 100m class telescopes: New challenges require new solutions,” in Adaptive Optical Systems Technology, P. Wizinowich, ed., Proc. SPIE 4007, 1076–1087 (2000).
  7. B. L. Ellerbroek and F. J. Rigaut, “Scaling multiconjugate adaptive optics performance estimates to extremely large telescopes,” in Adaptive Optical Systems Technology, P. Wizinowich, ed., Proc. SPIE 4007, 1088–1099 (2000).
  8. D. L. Fried, “Artificial-guide-star tilt-anisoplanatism: its magnitude and (limited) amelioration,” in Adaptive Optics, M. Cullum, ed., Vol. 23 of 1995 OSA Technical Digest Series (Optical Society of America, Washington, D.C., 1995), pp. 363–369.
  9. J. Vernin, A. Agabi, R. Avila, M. Azouit, R. Conan, F. Martin, E. Masciadri, L. Sanchez, and A. Ziad, “1998 Gemini site testing campaign: Cerro Pachon and Cerro Tololo,” Gemini Document RTP-AO-G0094 (Gemini Observatory, Hilo, Hawaii, 2000).
  10. B. L. Ellerbroek and D. W. Tyler, “Adaptive optics sky coverage calculations for the Gemini-North telescope,” Proc. Astron. Soc. Pac. 110, 165–185 (1998).
  11. R. J. Noll, “Zernike polynomials and atmospheric turbulence,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. 66, 207–211 (1976).

Cited By

Alert me when this paper is cited

OSA is able to provide readers links to articles that cite this paper by participating in CrossRef's Cited-By Linking service. CrossRef includes content from more than 3000 publishers and societies. In addition to listing OSA journal articles that cite this paper, citing articles from other participating publishers will also be listed.


« Previous Article  |  Next Article »

OSA is a member of CrossRef.

CrossCheck Deposited