OSA's Digital Library

Journal of the Optical Society of America A

Journal of the Optical Society of America A

| OPTICS, IMAGE SCIENCE, AND VISION

  • Vol. 18, Iss. 2 — Feb. 1, 2001
  • pp: 283–293

Contrast sensitivity function and image discrimination

Eli Peli  »View Author Affiliations


JOSA A, Vol. 18, Issue 2, pp. 283-293 (2001)
http://dx.doi.org/10.1364/JOSAA.18.000283


View Full Text Article

Enhanced HTML    Acrobat PDF (1061 KB)





Browse Journals / Lookup Meetings

Browse by Journal and Year


   


Lookup Conference Papers

Close Browse Journals / Lookup Meetings

Article Tools

Share
Citations

Abstract

A previous study tested the validity of simulations of the appearance of a natural image (from different observation distances) generated by using a visual model and contrast sensitivity functions of the individual observers [J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 13, 1131 (1996)]. Deleting image spatial-frequency components that should be undetectable made the simulations indistinguishable from the original images at distances larger than the simulated distance. The simulated observation distance accurately predicted the distance at which the simulated image could be discriminated from the original image. Owing to the 1/f characteristic of natural images’ spatial spectra, the individual contrast sensitivity functions (CSF’s) used in the simulations of the previous study were actually tested only over a narrow range of retinal spatial frequencies. To test the CSF’s over a wide range of frequencies, the same simulations and testing procedure were applied to five contrast versions of the images (10–300%). This provides a stronger test of the model, of the simulations, and specifically of the CSF’s used. The relevant CSF for a discrimination task was found to be obtained by using 1-octave Gabor stimuli measured in a contrast detection task. The relevant CSF data had to be measured over a range of observation distances, owing to limitations of the displays.

© 2001 Optical Society of America

OCIS Codes
(330.1800) Vision, color, and visual optics : Vision - contrast sensitivity
(330.1880) Vision, color, and visual optics : Detection
(330.4060) Vision, color, and visual optics : Vision modeling
(330.5000) Vision, color, and visual optics : Vision - patterns and recognition
(330.6100) Vision, color, and visual optics : Spatial discrimination
(330.6110) Vision, color, and visual optics : Spatial filtering

History
Original Manuscript: November 29, 1999
Revised Manuscript: July 21, 2000
Manuscript Accepted: July 21, 2000
Published: February 1, 2001

Citation
Eli Peli, "Contrast sensitivity function and image discrimination," J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 18, 283-293 (2001)
http://www.opticsinfobase.org/josaa/abstract.cfm?URI=josaa-18-2-283


Sort:  Author  |  Year  |  Journal  |  Reset  

References

  1. A. P. Ginsburg, “Visual information processing based on spatial filters constrained by biological data,” Ph.D. dissertation (Cambridge University, Cambridge, UK, 1978).
  2. B. L. Lundh, G. Derefeldt, S. Nyberg, G. Lennerstrand, “Picture simulation of contrast sensitivity in organic and functional amblyopia,” Acta Ophthalmol. 59, 774–783 (1981).
  3. D. Pelli, “What is low vision?” Videotape, Institute for Sensory Research, Syracuse University, Syracuse, N.Y., 1990.
  4. L. N. Thibos, A. Bradley, “The limits of performance in central and peripheral vision,” in SID ’91 Digest of Technical Papers (Society for Information Display, Playa del Rey, Calif., 1991), Vol. XXII, pp. 301–303.
  5. J. Larimer, “Designing tomorrow’s displays,” NASA Tech. Briefs 17, 14–16 (1993).
  6. J. Lubin, “A visual discrimination model for imaging system design and evaluation,” in Vision Models for Target Detection, E. Peli, ed. (World Scientific, Singapore, 1995), Chap. 10, pp. 245–283.
  7. E. Peli, R. B. Goldstein, G. M. Young, C. L. Trempe, S. M. Buzney, “Image enhancement for the visually impaired:simulations and experimental results,” Invest. Ophthalmol. Visual Sci. 32, 2337–2350 (1991).
  8. E. Peli, “Contrast in complex images,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 7, 2030–2040 (1990). [CrossRef]
  9. S. Daly, “The visual differences predictor: an algorithm for the assessment of image fidelity,” in Human Vision: Visual Processing, and Digital Display III, B. E. Rogowitz, ed. Proc. SPIE1666, 2–15 (1992). [CrossRef]
  10. M. Duval-Destin, “A spatio-temporal complete description of contrast,” in SID’91 Digest of Technical Papers (Society for Information Display, Playa del Rey, Calif., 1991), Vol. XXII, pp. 615–618.
  11. E. Peli, “Test of a model of foveal vision by using simulations,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 13, 1131–1138 (1996). [CrossRef]
  12. E. Peli, L. Arend, G. Young, R. Goldstein, “Contrast sensitivity to patch stimuli: effects of spatial bandwidth and temporal presentation,” Spatial Vision 7, 1–14 (1993). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. E. Peli, “Simulating normal and low vision,” in Vision Models for Target Detection and Recognition, E. Peli, ed. (World Scientific, Singapore, 1995), Chap. 3, pp. 63–87.
  14. B. R. Stephens, M. S. Banks, “The development of contrast constancy,” J. Exp. Child. Psychol. 40, 528–547 (1985). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. N. Brady, D. J. Field, “What’s constant in contrast constancy? The effects of scaling on the perceived contrast of bandpass patterns,” Vision Res. 35, 739–756 (1995). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. D. J. Field, “Relations between the statistics of natural images and the response properties of cortical cells,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 4, 2379–2394 (1987). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. D. J. Tolhurst, Y. Tadmor, T. Chao, “The amplitude spectra of natural images,” Ophthalmic Physiol. Opt. 12, 229–232 (1992). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. D. L. Ruderman, W. Bialeck, “Statistics of natural images: scaling in the woods,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 73, 814–817 (1994). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Y. Tadmor, D. J. Tolhurst, “Discrimination of changes in the second-order statistics of natural and synthetic images,” Vision Res. 34, 541–554 (1994). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. D. J. Tolhurst, Y. Tadmor, “Band-limited contrast in natural images explains the detectability of changes in the amplitude spectra,” Vision Res. 37, 3203–3215 (1997). [CrossRef]
  21. E. Peli, “Display nonlinearity in digital image processing for visual communications,” Opt. Eng. 31, 2374–2382 (1992). [CrossRef]
  22. These images were originally recorded with standard video cameras designed to display on a nonlinearized CRT. To enable a linear relationship between the displayed luminance levels and the numerical representation of the images, we presented the images using a linearizing (Gamma corrected) lookup table. To maintain the natural appearance and contrast range of the images, the original images were preprocessed to include the measured display Gamma function.21
  23. In fact, it was the amplitude, not the contrast, of the images that was increased or decreased. This operation, in which the image mean value is subtracted and the remaining values are scaled up or down, is frequently referred to as contrast increase or decrease. As noted by Peli,8the changes in contrast are equivalent to changes in amplitude only where the local luminance is equal to the mean luminance. I will use the term contrast changes here to conform to previous usage, recognizing that in many places the differences were small. This distinction has no bearing on the results or the conclusions drawn here. The contrast of an image can be changed by a fixed factor for all frequencies and locations by using a band-by-band amplification within the context of the contrast metric developed in Ref. 8.
  24. The CSF was also measured with a staircase procedure. Only the CSF measured with MOA methods was used in the simulation study. For the subjects who were well-trained psychophysics subjects, the results with MOA differed only slightly from the CSF obtained with the staircase procedure. The CSF data and the standard error of themeasurements were similar to data collected for these stimuli with different systems and with adaptive forced-choice procedures.12This was not the case for the novice subject. For this subject (JML) the staircase-procedure data was similar to the data from the other observers, but the MOA data showed substantially reduced sensitivity (as much as 0.5 log unit at middle and low frequencies), even when measured repeatedly. It is interesting to note that for this subject the MOA results provided a better prediction of the simulation performance than did the CSF obtained with the staircase procedure.
  25. A. B. Watson, “The cortex transform: rapid computation of simulated neural images,” Comput. Vision Graph. Image Process. 39, 311–327 (1987). [CrossRef]
  26. H. R. Wilson, “Quantitative models for pattern detection and discrimination,” in Vision Models for Target Detection and Recognition, E. Peli, ed. (World Scientific, Singapore, 1995), Chap. 1, pp. 3–15.
  27. A. J. Ahumada, “Simplified vision models for image-quality assessment,” in SID’96 Digest of Technical Papers (Society for Information Display, Santa Ana, Calif., 1996), Vol. XXVII, pp. 397–400.
  28. F. W. Campbell, J. G. Robson, “Application of Fourier analysis to the visibility of gratings,” J. Physiol. (London) 203, 223–235 (1968).
  29. M. A. Garcia-Perez, V. Sierra-Vazquez, “Visual processing in the joint spatial/spatial-frequency domain,” in Vision Models for Target Detection, E. Peli, ed. (World Scientific, Singapore, 1995), Chap. 2, pp. 16–62.
  30. L. Hainline, J. de Bie, I. Abramov, C. Camenzuli, “Eye movement voting: a new technique for deriving spatial contrast sensitivity,” Clin. Vision Sci. 1, 33–44 (1987).
  31. E. Peli, M. A. Garcia-Perez, “Artifacts of CRT displays in vision research and other critical applications,” in SID 2000 Digest of Technical Papers, J. Morreale, ed. (Society for Information Display, San Jose, Calif., 2000), Vol. XXXI, pp. 396–399.
  32. J. B. Mulligan, L. S. Stone, “Halftoning method for the generation of motion stimuli,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 6, 1217–1227 (1989). [CrossRef]

Cited By

Alert me when this paper is cited

OSA is able to provide readers links to articles that cite this paper by participating in CrossRef's Cited-By Linking service. CrossRef includes content from more than 3000 publishers and societies. In addition to listing OSA journal articles that cite this paper, citing articles from other participating publishers will also be listed.


« Previous Article  |  Next Article »

OSA is a member of CrossRef.

CrossCheck Deposited