OSA's Digital Library

Journal of the Optical Society of America A

Journal of the Optical Society of America A

| OPTICS, IMAGE SCIENCE, AND VISION

  • Vol. 18, Iss. 2 — Feb. 1, 2001
  • pp: 294–301

Discrimination of wide-field images as a test of a peripheral-vision model

Eli Peli and George A. Geri  »View Author Affiliations


JOSA A, Vol. 18, Issue 2, pp. 294-301 (2001)
http://dx.doi.org/10.1364/JOSAA.18.000294


View Full Text Article

Enhanced HTML    Acrobat PDF (276 KB)





Browse Journals / Lookup Meetings

Browse by Journal and Year


   


Lookup Conference Papers

Close Browse Journals / Lookup Meetings

Article Tools

Share
Citations

Abstract

In order to test a model of peripheral vision, various contrast sensitivity functions (CSF’s) and fundamental eccentricity constants (FEC’s) [see J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 8, 1762 (1991)] were applied to real-world, wide-field (6.4°–32° eccentricity) images. The FEC is used to model the change in contrast sensitivity as a function of retinal eccentricity. The processed test images were tested perceptually by determining the threshold FEC for which the observers could discriminate the test images from the original image. It was expected that higher CSF sensitivity would be associated with higher FEC’s; and in fact, for images processed with low-pass (variable-window stimuli) CSF’s, the threshold FEC’s were larger for the higher-sensitivity (pattern-detection) CSF than for the lower-sensitivity (orientation detection) CSF. When two higher-sensitivity CSF’s were compared, the bandpass (constant-window stimuli) CSF resulted in essentially the same FEC threshold as did the low-pass (variable-window stimuli) CSF. The fact that the FEC compensated for complex differences in the form of the CSF suggested that the discrimination task was mediated by a limited range of spatial frequencies over which the two CSF’s were similar. Image contrast was then varied in order to extend the range of spatial frequencies tested. The FEC’s estimated with the lower-contrast test images were unchanged for test images obtained with the high-sensitivity, bandpass CSF but increased for test images obtained with the high-sensitivity, low-pass CSF. These results suggest that peripheral contrast sensitivity as used in the present discrimination task is based on a high-sensitivity, bandpass CSF. The peripheral-vision model validated by the present analysis has practical applications in the evaluation of wide-field simulator images as well as area-of-interest or other foveating systems.

© 2001 Optical Society of America

OCIS Codes
(330.1800) Vision, color, and visual optics : Vision - contrast sensitivity
(330.1880) Vision, color, and visual optics : Detection
(330.4060) Vision, color, and visual optics : Vision modeling
(330.5000) Vision, color, and visual optics : Vision - patterns and recognition
(330.6100) Vision, color, and visual optics : Spatial discrimination
(330.6110) Vision, color, and visual optics : Spatial filtering

History
Original Manuscript: March 13, 2000
Revised Manuscript: August 17, 2000
Manuscript Accepted: August 17, 2000
Published: February 1, 2001

Citation
Eli Peli and George A. Geri, "Discrimination of wide-field images as a test of a peripheral-vision model," J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 18, 294-301 (2001)
http://www.opticsinfobase.org/josaa/abstract.cfm?URI=josaa-18-2-294


Sort:  Author  |  Year  |  Journal  |  Reset  

References

  1. A. P. Ginsburg, “Visual information processing based on spatial filters constrained by biological data,” Ph.D. dissertation (Cambridge University, Cambridge, UK, 1978).
  2. B. L. Lundh, G. Derefeldt, S. Nyberg, G. Lennerstrand, “Picture simulation of contrast sensitivity in organic and functional amblyopia,” Acta Ophthalmol. (KbH) 59, 774–783 (1981).
  3. D. Pelli, “What is low vision?” Videotape, Institute for Sensory Research, Syracuse University, Syracuse, N.Y. (1990).
  4. L. N. Thibos, A. Bradley, “The limits of performance in central and peripheral vision,” in Vol. 22 of Society for Information Display Digest of Technical Papers (Society for Information Display, Santa Ana, Calif., 1991), pp. 301–303.
  5. J. Larimer, “Designing tomorrow’s displays,” NASA Tech. Briefs 17(4), 14–16 (1993).
  6. J. Lubin, “A visual discrimination model for imaging system design and evaluation,” in Vision Models for Target Detection, E. Peli, ed. (World Scientific, Singapore, 1995), pp. 245–283.
  7. E. Peli, R. B. Goldstein, G. M. Young, C. L. Trempe, S. M. Buzney, “Image enhancement for the visually impaired: simulations and experimental results,” Invest. Ophthalmol. Visual Sci. 32, 2337–2350 (1991).
  8. E. Peli, “Contrast in complex images,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 7, 2032–2040 (1990). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. S. Daly, “The visual differences predictor: an algorithm for the assessment of image fidelity,” in Human Vision, Visual Processing, and Digital Display III, B. E. Rogowitz, ed., Proc. SPIE1666, 2–15 (1992). [CrossRef]
  10. M. Duval-Destin, “A spatio-temporal complete description of contrast,” in Vol. 22 of Society for Information Display Digest of Technical Papers (Society for Information Display, Santa Ana, Calif., 1991), pp. 615–618.
  11. E. Peli, J. Yang, R. Goldstein, “Image invariance with changes in size: the role of peripheral contrast thresholds,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 8, 1762–1774 (1991). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. E. Peli, “Test of a model of foveal vision by using simulations,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 13, 1131–1138 (1996). [CrossRef]
  13. E. Peli, “Contrast sensitivity function and image discrimination,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 18, 283–293 (2001). [CrossRef]
  14. E. L. Schwartz, “Spatial mapping in the primate sensory projection: analytic structure and relevance to perception,” Biol. Cybern. 25, 181–194 (1977). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. A. B. Watson, “Estimation of local spatial scale,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 4, 1579–1582 (1987). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. A. Johnston, “Spatial scaling of central and peripheral contrast-sensitivity functions,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 4, 1583–1593 (1987). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. J. S. Pointer, R. F. Hess, “The contrast sensitivity gradient across the human visual field with emphasis on the low spatial frequency range,” Vision Res. 29, 1133–1151 (1989). [CrossRef]
  18. M. W. Cannon, “Perceived contrast in the fovea and periphery,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 2, 1760–1768 (1985). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. W. Weibull, “A statistical distribution function of wide applicability,” J. Appl. Mech. 18, 293–297 (1951).
  20. The curve fitting was done with the SigmaPlot Scientific Graph System (Jandel Scientific).
  21. E. Peli, G. Geri, “Putting simulations of peripheral vision to the test,” Invest. Ophthalmol. Visual Sci. 34 (ARVO Suppl.), 820 (1993).
  22. E. Peli, “Simulating normal and low vision,” in Vision Models for Target Detection and Recognition, E. Peli, ed. (World Scientific, Singapore, 1995), pp. 63–87.
  23. E. Peli, L. Arend, G. Young, R. Goldstein, “Contrast sensitivity to patch stimuli: effects of spatial bandwidth and temporal presentation,” Spatial Vis. 7, 1–14 (1993). [CrossRef]
  24. A. B. Watson, “The cortex transform: rapid computation of simulated neural images,” Comput. Vision Graph. Image Process. 39, 311–327 (1987). [CrossRef]
  25. Under the HS/BP condition, the psychometric function for C=0.1was found to have a shape different from those obtained at the other contrast levels. The slope of the psychometric function may be related to the underlying signal to noise level, and thus it is not surprising that reducing the image contrast resulted in a flatter function with little or no change in the threshold FEC value.
  26. J. S. Lauritzen, S. M. Hood, D. J. Tolhurst, Y. Tadmor, A. Pelah, “Detection of Gabor patches embedded in natural images,” Perception 27, 151–152 (1998).
  27. W. S. Geisler, J. S. Perry, “A real-time foveated multi-resolution system for low-bandwidth video communication,” in Human Vision and Electronic Imaging III, B. Rogowitz, T. Pappas, eds., Proc. SPIE3299, 294–305 (1998). [CrossRef]

Cited By

Alert me when this paper is cited

OSA is able to provide readers links to articles that cite this paper by participating in CrossRef's Cited-By Linking service. CrossRef includes content from more than 3000 publishers and societies. In addition to listing OSA journal articles that cite this paper, citing articles from other participating publishers will also be listed.


« Previous Article  |  Next Article »

OSA is a member of CrossRef.

CrossCheck Deposited