OSA's Digital Library

Journal of the Optical Society of America A

Journal of the Optical Society of America A


  • Vol. 18, Iss. 2 — Feb. 1, 2001
  • pp: 360–366

Light scattering and ink penetration effects on tone reproduction

Li Yang, Reiner Lenz, and Björn Kruse  »View Author Affiliations

JOSA A, Vol. 18, Issue 2, pp. 360-366 (2001)

View Full Text Article

Enhanced HTML    Acrobat PDF (199 KB)

Browse Journals / Lookup Meetings

Browse by Journal and Year


Lookup Conference Papers

Close Browse Journals / Lookup Meetings

Article Tools



Light scattering, or the so-called Yule–Nielsen effect, and ink penetration into the substrate paper play important roles in tone reproduction. We develop a framework in which the influences of both of these effects on the reflectance and tristimulus values of a halftone sample are investigated. The properties of the paper and the ink and their bilateral interaction can be parameterized by the reflectance Rp0 of the substrate paper, the transmittance Ti of the ink layer, the parameter γ describing the ink penetration, and p¯ describing the Yule–Nielsen effect. We derive explicit expressions that relate the reflectance of the ink dots (Ri), the paper (Rp) and the halftone image (R) as functions of these parameters. We also describe the optical dot gain as a function of these parameters. We further demonstrate that ink penetration leads to a decrease in optical dot gain and that scattering in the paper results in the printed image’s being viewed as more saturated in color.

© 2001 Optical Society of America

OCIS Codes
(290.7050) Scattering : Turbid media

Original Manuscript: November 23, 1999
Revised Manuscript: June 22, 2000
Manuscript Accepted: June 22, 2000
Published: February 1, 2001

Li Yang, Reiner Lenz, and Björn Kruse, "Light scattering and ink penetration effects on tone reproduction," J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 18, 360-366 (2001)

Sort:  Author  |  Year  |  Journal  |  Reset  


  1. A. Murray, “Monochrome reproduction in photoengraving,” J. Franklin Inst. 221, 721 (1936). [CrossRef]
  2. H. Neugebauer, “Die theoretischen Grundlagen des Mehrfarbenbuchdrucks,” Z. Tech. Phys. (Leipzig) 36, 75–89 (1937).
  3. J. Yule, W. Nielsen, “The penetration of light into paper and its effect on halftone reproduction,” in TAGA (Tech. Assoc. Graphic Arts) Proc., 65–76 (1951).
  4. I. Pobboravsky, M. Person, “Computation of dot areas required to match a colorimetrically specified color using the modified Neugebauer equations,” in TAGA (Tech. Assoc. Graphic Arts) Proc., 65–77 (1972).
  5. F. Ruckdeschel, O. Hauser, “Yule–Nielsen effect in printing: a physical analysis,” Appl. Opt. 17, 3376–3383 (1978). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. S. Gustavson, “Dot gain in color halftones,” Ph.D. dissertation (Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden, 1997).
  7. S. Gustavson, “Color gamut of halftone reproduction,” J. Imaging Sci. Technol. 41, 283–290 (1997).
  8. G. Rogers, “Optical dot gain in a halftone print,” J. Imaging Sci. Technol. 41, 643–656 (1997).
  9. G. Rogers, “Effect of light scatter on halftone color,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 15, 1813–1821 (1998). [CrossRef]
  10. G. Rogers, “Neugebauer revisited: random dots in halftone screening,” Color Res. Appl. 23, 104–113 (1998). [CrossRef]
  11. G. Rogers, “Optical dot gain: lateral scattering probabilities,” J. Imaging Sci. Technol. 42, 341–345 (1998).
  12. J. Arney, “A probability description of the Yule–Nielsen effect I,” J. Imaging Sci. Technol. 41, 633–636 (1997).
  13. J. Arney, M. Katsube, “A probability description of the Yule–Nielsen effect II: the impact of halftone geometry,” J. Imaging Sci. Technol. 41, 637–642 (1997).
  14. J. Huntsman, “A new model of dot gain and its application to a multilayer color proof,” J. Imaging Sci. Technol. 13, 136–145 (1987).
  15. J. Arney, M. Alber, “Optical effects of ink spread and penetration on halftone printed by thermal ink jet,” J. Imaging Sci. Technol. 42, 331–334 (1998).
  16. L. Yang, B. Kruse, “Ink penetration and its effects on printing,” in Color Imaging: Device-Independent Color, Color Hardcopy, and Graphic Arts V, R. Eschbach, G. G. Marcu, eds., Proc. SPIE3963, 365–375 (2000).
  17. J. Arney, P. Engeldrum, H. Zeng, “An expanded Murray–Davis model of tone reproduction in halftone imaging,” J. Imaging Sci. Technol. 39, 502–508 (1995).
  18. M. Andersson, “A study in how the ink set, solid ink density, and screening method influence the color gamut in four-color process printing,” M. Sc. thesis (Rochester Institute of Technology, Rochester, New York, 1997).

Cited By

Alert me when this paper is cited

OSA is able to provide readers links to articles that cite this paper by participating in CrossRef's Cited-By Linking service. CrossRef includes content from more than 3000 publishers and societies. In addition to listing OSA journal articles that cite this paper, citing articles from other participating publishers will also be listed.


Fig. 1 Fig. 2 Fig. 3
Fig. 4 Fig. 5

« Previous Article  |  Next Article »

OSA is a member of CrossRef.

CrossCheck Deposited