OSA's Digital Library

Journal of the Optical Society of America A

Journal of the Optical Society of America A

| OPTICS, IMAGE SCIENCE, AND VISION

  • Vol. 18, Iss. 5 — May. 1, 2001
  • pp: 993–1002

Luminance spatial scale facilitates stereoscopic depth segmentation

Frederick A. A. Kingdom, Lynn R. Ziegler, and Robert F. Hess  »View Author Affiliations


JOSA A, Vol. 18, Issue 5, pp. 993-1002 (2001)
http://dx.doi.org/10.1364/JOSAA.18.000993


View Full Text Article

Enhanced HTML    Acrobat PDF (1129 KB)





Browse Journals / Lookup Meetings

Browse by Journal and Year


   


Lookup Conference Papers

Close Browse Journals / Lookup Meetings

Article Tools

Share
Citations

Abstract

Are differences in luminance spatial frequency between surfaces that overlap in depth useful for surface segmentation? We examined this question, using a novel stimulus termed a dual-surface disparity grating. The dual-surface grating was made from Gabor micropatterns and consisted of two superimposed sinusoidal disparity gratings of identical disparity-modulation spatial frequency and orientation but of opposite spatial phase. Corrugation amplitude thresholds for discrimination of the orientation of the dual-surface grating were obtained as a function of the difference in Gabor (luminance) spatial frequency between the two surfaces. When the Gabor micropatterns on the two surfaces were identical in spatial frequency, thresholds were very high and in some instances impossible to obtain. However, with as little as a 1-octave difference in spatial frequency between the surfaces, thresholds fell sharply to near-asymptotic levels. The fall in thresholds paralleled a change in the appearance of the stimulus from one of irregular depth to stereo transparency. The most parsimonious explanation for this finding is that the introduction of a between-surface luminance spatial-frequency difference reduces the number of spurious cross-surface binocular matches, thus helping to reveal the three-dimensional structure of the stimulus.

© 2001 Optical Society of America

OCIS Codes
(330.0330) Vision, color, and visual optics : Vision, color, and visual optics
(330.1400) Vision, color, and visual optics : Vision - binocular and stereopsis
(330.5510) Vision, color, and visual optics : Psychophysics
(330.7310) Vision, color, and visual optics : Vision

History
Original Manuscript: September 6, 2000
Manuscript Accepted: October 26, 2000
Published: May 1, 2001

Citation
Frederick A. A. Kingdom, Lynn R. Ziegler, and Robert F. Hess, "Luminance spatial scale facilitates stereoscopic depth segmentation," J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 18, 993-1002 (2001)
http://www.opticsinfobase.org/josaa/abstract.cfm?URI=josaa-18-5-993


Sort:  Author  |  Year  |  Journal  |  Reset  

References

  1. K. Prazdny, “Detection of binocular disparities,” Biol. Cybern. 52, 93–99 (1985). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. R. A. Akerstrom, J. T. Todd, “The perception of stereoscopic transparency,” Percept. Psychophys. 44, 421–432 (1988). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. D. Weinshall, “Perception of multiple transparent planes in stereo vision,” Nature 341, 737–739 (1989). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. S. Gephstein, A. Cooperman, “Stereoscopic transparency: A test for binocular disambiguating power,” Vision Res. 38, 2913–2932 (1998). [CrossRef]
  5. I. P. Howard, B. J. Rogers, Binocular Vision and Stereopsis (Oxford U. Press, Oxford, UK, 1995). For a discussion of disparity averaging and its limitations as an explanatory concept, see pp. 230–234. For a discussion of the constraints on stereo matching, see pp. 216–229.
  6. J. M. Lankheet, M. Palmen, “Stereoscopic segregation of transparent surfaces and the effect of motion contrast,” Vision Res. 38, 659–668 (1998). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. B. Julesz, J. E. Miller, “Independent spatial frequency tuned channels in binocular fusion and rivalry,” Perception 4, 125–143 (1975). [CrossRef]
  8. J. E. W. Mayhew, J. P. Frisby, “Rivalrous texture stereograms,” Nature 264, 53–56 (1976). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. C. M. Schor, I. Wood, “Disparity range for local stereopsis as a function of luminance spatial frequency,” Vision Res. 23, 1649–1654 (1983). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. H. R. Wilson, R. Blake, D. L. Halpern, “Coarse spatial scales constrain the range of fusion of fine spatial scales,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 8, 229–236 (1991). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. Y. Yang, R. Blake, “Spatial frequency tuning of human stereopsis,” Vision Res. 31, 1177–1189 (1991). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. H. S. Smallman, D. I. A. MacLeod, “Size-disparity correlation in stereopsis at contrast threshold,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 11, 2169–2183 (1994). [CrossRef]
  13. G. C. DeAngelis, I. Ohzawa, R. D. Freeman, “Neuronal mechanisms underlying stereopsis: How do simple cells in the visual cortex encode binocular disparity?” Perception 24, 3–31 (1995). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. A. M. Rohaly, H. R. Wilson, “Disparity averaging across spatial scales,” Vision Res. 34, 1315–1325 (1994). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. B. Julesz, S. C. Johnson, “Stereograms portraying ambiguous perceivable surfaces,” Proc. Natl. Soc. 61, 437–441 (1968). [CrossRef]
  16. A. J. Parker, Y. Yang, “Spatial properties of disparity pooling in human stereo vision,” Vision Res. 29, 1525–1538 (1989). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. S. B. Stevenson, L. K. Cormack, C. M. Schor, “Depth attraction and repulsion in random dot stereograms,” Vision Res. 31, 805–813 (1991). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. C. W. Tyler, “Depth perception in disparity gratings,” Nature 251, 140–142 (1974). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. F. A. A. Kingdom, L. R. Ziegler, R. F. Hess, “The role of spatial scale in stereoscopic segmentation,” Perception Suppl. 27, 21 (1998).
  20. K. Boothroyd, R. Blake, “Stereopsis from disparity of complex grating patterns,” Vision Res. 24, 1205–1222 (1984). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  21. H. S. Smallman, S. P. McKee, “A contrast ratio constraint on stereo matching,” Proc. R. Soc. London Ser. B 260, 265–271 (1995). [CrossRef]
  22. R. F. Hess, F. A. A. Kingdom, L. R. Ziegler, “On the relationship between the spatial channels for luminance and disparity processing,” Vision Res. 39, 559–568 (1999). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. M. A. Georgeson, G. D. Sullivan, “Contrast constancy: Deblurring in human vision by spatial frequency channels,” J. Physiol. (London) 252, 677–656 (1975).
  24. N. Brady, D. J. Field, “What’s constant in contrast constancy? The effect of scaling on the perceived contrast of bandpass patterns,” Vision Res. 35, 739–756 (1995). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. R. A. Schumer, L. Ganz, “Independent stereoscopic channels for different extents of spatial pooling,” Vision Res. 19, 1303–1314 (1979). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. C. W. Tyler, “Sensory processing of binocular disparity,” in Vergence Eye Movements: Basic and Clinical Aspects, M. C. Schor, K. J. Ciuffreda, eds. (Butterworth, Boston, Mass., 1983), pp. 199–296.
  27. A. B. Cobo-Lewis, Y. Y. Yeh, “Selectivity of cyclopean masking for the spatial frequency of disparity modulation,” Vision Res. 34, 607–620 (1994). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. K. Pulliam, “Spatial frequency analysis of three-dimensional vision,” in Visual Simulation and Image Realism II, K. S. Setty, ed., Proc. SPIE303, 71–77 (1981). [CrossRef]
  29. B. Lee, B. Rogers, “Disparity modulation sensitivity for narrow-band-filtered stereograms,” Vision Res. 37, 1769–1778 (1997). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  30. R. Blake, H. R. Wilson, “Neural models of stereoscopic vision,” Trends Neurosci. 14, 445–452 (1991). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  31. L. R. Ziegler, R. F. Hess, “Stereoscopic depth but not shape perception from second-order stimuli,” Vision Res. 39, 1491–1507 (1999). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. L. R. Ziegler, F. A. A. Kingdom, R. F. Hess, “Local luminance factors that determine the maximum disparity for seeing cyclopean surface shape,” Vision Res. 40, 1157–1165 (2000). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. G. Sperling, “Binocular vision: A physical and a neural theory,” Am. J. Psychol. 83, 461–534 (1970). [CrossRef]
  34. J. L. Nelson, “Globality and stereoscopic fusion in binocular vision,” J. Theor. Biol. 49, 1–88 (1975). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. D. Marr, T. Poggio, “Cooperative computation of stereo disparity,” Science 194, 283–287 (1976). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. J. E. W. Mayhew, J. P. Frisby, “The computation of binocular edges,” Perception 9, 69–86 (1980). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. J. Gibson, The Perception of the Visual World (Houghton-Mifflin, Boston, Mass., 1950).
  38. J. Cutting, R. Millard, “Three gradients and the perception of flat and curved surfaces,” J. Exp. Psychol. Gen. 113, 198–216 (1984). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. J. Todd, R. Akerstrom, “Perception of three-dimensional form from patterns of optical texture,” J. Exp. Psychol. Hum. Percep. 13, 242–255 (1987). [CrossRef]
  40. K. Stevens, A. Brookes, “Integrating stereopsis with monocular interpretations of planar surfaces,” Vision Res. 28, 371–386 (1988). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

Cited By

Alert me when this paper is cited

OSA is able to provide readers links to articles that cite this paper by participating in CrossRef's Cited-By Linking service. CrossRef includes content from more than 3000 publishers and societies. In addition to listing OSA journal articles that cite this paper, citing articles from other participating publishers will also be listed.


Next Article »

OSA is a member of CrossRef.

CrossCheck Deposited