OSA's Digital Library

Journal of the Optical Society of America A

Journal of the Optical Society of America A


  • Vol. 18, Iss. 8 — Aug. 1, 2001
  • pp: 1853–1861

Alternative implementations of the Two-Mu algorithm

J. D. Silverstein  »View Author Affiliations

JOSA A, Vol. 18, Issue 8, pp. 1853-1861 (2001)

View Full Text Article

Enhanced HTML    Acrobat PDF (632 KB)

Browse Journals / Lookup Meetings

Browse by Journal and Year


Lookup Conference Papers

Close Browse Journals / Lookup Meetings

Article Tools



I describe implementations of the Two-Mu image-restoration algorithm that model the center portion of the convolution of the point-spread function and the original image (this has been done heretofore), as well as those that model the full range of that convolution. The full convolution methods produce processed images of simple, simulated scenes that are comparable in quality with, and often involve computations that are considerably shorter than, those of the center convolution methods. The full convolution methods incur some loss of information near the edge of the scene. However, that loss may not be significant for large images, especially for those in which the important information is far from the edge of the scene.

© 2001 Optical Society of America

OCIS Codes
(100.0100) Image processing : Image processing
(100.1830) Image processing : Deconvolution
(100.2000) Image processing : Digital image processing
(100.3020) Image processing : Image reconstruction-restoration

Original Manuscript: July 26, 2000
Manuscript Accepted: November 6, 2000
Published: August 1, 2001

J. D. Silverstein, "Alternative implementations of the Two-Mu algorithm," J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 18, 1853-1861 (2001)

Sort:  Author  |  Year  |  Journal  |  Reset  


  1. M. R. Banham, A. K. Kastaggelos, “Digital image restoration,” IEEE Signal Process. Mag. 14(2), 24–41 (1997). [CrossRef]
  2. D. G. Gleed, A. H. Lettington, “High speed super-resolution techniques for passive millimeter-wave imaging systems,” in Image and Video Processing II, R. L. Stevenson, S. A. Rajala, eds., Proc. SPIE2182, 255–265 (1994). [CrossRef]
  3. R. M. Smith, K. D. Trott, B. M. Sundstrom, D. Ewen, “The passive mm-wave scenario,” Microwave J. 39(3), 22–34 (1996).
  4. R. C. Gonzalez, R. E. Woods, Digital Image Processing (Addison-Wesley, Reading, Mass., 1992).
  5. G. H. Golub, C. F. Van Loan, Matrix Computations (Johns Hopkins U. Press, Baltimore, Md., 1996).
  6. R. Kumar, “A fast algorithm for solving a Toeplitz system of equations,” IEEE Trans. Acoust. Speech Signal Process. ASP-33, 54–67 (1985).
  7. B. R. Hunt, “The application of constrained least squares estimation to image restoration by digital computer,” IEEE Trans. Comput. C-23, 805–812 (1973). [CrossRef]
  8. J. D. Silverstein, “Resolution and resolution improvement of passive millimeter-wave images,” in Passive Millimeter-Wave Imaging Technology III, R. M. Smith, ed., Proc. SPIE3703, 140–154 (1999). [CrossRef]
  9. M. Born, E. Wolf, Principles of Optics (Cambridge U. Press, Cambridge, UK, 1997).

Cited By

Alert me when this paper is cited

OSA is able to provide readers links to articles that cite this paper by participating in CrossRef's Cited-By Linking service. CrossRef includes content from more than 3000 publishers and societies. In addition to listing OSA journal articles that cite this paper, citing articles from other participating publishers will also be listed.

« Previous Article  |  Next Article »

OSA is a member of CrossRef.

CrossCheck Deposited