OSA's Digital Library

Journal of the Optical Society of America A

Journal of the Optical Society of America A

| OPTICS, IMAGE SCIENCE, AND VISION

  • Vol. 18, Iss. 9 — Sep. 1, 2001
  • pp: 2220–2227

Detection of contrast-defined shape

Robert F. Hess, Rebecca L. Achtman, and Yi-Zhong Wang  »View Author Affiliations


JOSA A, Vol. 18, Issue 9, pp. 2220-2227 (2001)
http://dx.doi.org/10.1364/JOSAA.18.002220


View Full Text Article

Enhanced HTML    Acrobat PDF (767 KB)





Browse Journals / Lookup Meetings

Browse by Journal and Year


   


Lookup Conference Papers

Close Browse Journals / Lookup Meetings

Article Tools

Share
Citations

Abstract

We assessed the accuracy of contrast-defined shape detection of stimuli of constant aspect ratio, namely, circular bandpass stimuli whose radii were sinusoidally varied about a mean radius. Performance for these contrast-defined shapes, which we show is determined by the global rather than the local attributes of the stimulus, is 2–8 times worse than that for their luminance-defined counterparts, suggesting separate processing limitations. By spatially and orientationally filtering the two-dimensional fractal-noise carriers of which these stimuli were composed, we determined whether there are specific rules concerning the spatial and orientational input to shape detectors from mechanisms sensitive to the carrier structure. The results suggest that second-order circularity detectors receive mixed input from spatial-frequency-tuned and orientationally tuned cells.

© 2001 Optical Society of America

OCIS Codes
(330.5510) Vision, color, and visual optics : Psychophysics
(330.6100) Vision, color, and visual optics : Spatial discrimination
(330.6110) Vision, color, and visual optics : Spatial filtering
(330.7310) Vision, color, and visual optics : Vision

History
Original Manuscript: November 29, 2000
Revised Manuscript: April 9, 2001
Manuscript Accepted: April 9, 2001
Published: September 1, 2001

Citation
Robert F. Hess, Rebecca L. Achtman, and Yi-Zhong Wang, "Detection of contrast-defined shape," J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 18, 2220-2227 (2001)
http://www.opticsinfobase.org/josaa/abstract.cfm?URI=josaa-18-9-2220


Sort:  Author  |  Year  |  Journal  |  Reset  

References

  1. D. Regan, S. J. Hamstra, “Shape discrimination and the judgment of perfect symmetry: dissociation of shape from size,” Vision Res. 32, 1845–1864 (1992). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. F. Wilkinson, H. R. Wilson, C. Habak, “Detection and recognition of radial frequency patterns,” Vision Res. 38, 3555–3568 (1998). [CrossRef]
  3. H. R. Wilson, “Non-Fourier cortical processes in texture, form, and motion perception,” in Cerebral Cortex: Models of Cortical Circuitry, P. S. Ulinski, E. G. Jones, eds. (Plenum, New York, 1999), pp. 445–477.
  4. R. F. Hess, Y.-Z. Wang, S. C. Dakin, “Are judgments of circularity local or global?” Vision Res. 39, 4354–4360 (1999). [CrossRef]
  5. J. L. Gallant, J. Braun, D. C. Van Essen, “Selectivity for polar, hyperbolic, and Cartesian gratings in macaque visual cortex,” Science 259, 100–103 (1993). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. J. L. Gallant, C. E. Connor, S. Rakshit, J. W. Lewis, D. C. Van Essen, “Neural responses to polar, hyperbolic, and Cartesian gratings in area V4 of the macaque monkey,” J. Neurophysiol. 76, 2718–2739 (1996). [PubMed]
  7. F. W. Wilkinson, T. W. James, H. R. Wilson, J. S. Gati, R. S. Menon, M. A. Goodale, “Radial and concentric gratings selectivity activate high-level form vision areas in human extra-striate cortex: an fMRI study,” Curr. Biol. 10, 1455–1458 (2000). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Second-order mechanisms have been shown to have two types of spatial frequency and orientational tuning (see Refs. 12and 15), one for luminance modulation (carrier tuning) and another for contrast modulation (envelope tuning). The present study concerns only the former.
  9. P. Werkhoven, G. Sperling, C. Chubb, “The dimensionality of texture-defined motion: a single channel theory,” Vision Res. 33, 463–485 (1993). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. A. Sutter, G. Sperling, C. Chubb, “Measuring the spatial frequency selectivity of second-order texture mechanisms,” Vision Res. 35, 915–924 (1995). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. K. Langley, D. J. Fleet, P. B. Hibbard, “Linear filtering precedes nonlinear processing in early vision,” Curr. Biol. 6, 891–896 (1996). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Y. X. Zhou, C. L. Baker, “A processing stream in mammalian visual cortex neurons for non-Fourier responses,” Science 261, 98–101 (1993). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Y. X. Zhou, C. L. Baker, “Envelope-responsive neutrons in areas 17 and 18 of cat,” J. Neurophysiol. 72, 2134–2150 (1994). [PubMed]
  14. Y. X. Zhou, C. L. Baker, “Spatial properties of envelope-responsive cells in area 17 and 18 neurons of the cat,” J. Neurophysiol. 75, 1038–1050 (1996). [PubMed]
  15. I. Mareschal, C. L. Baker, “A cortical locus for the processing of contrast-defined contours,” Nat. Neurosci. 1, 150–154 (1998). [CrossRef]
  16. J. M. Zanker, “Interactions between primary and secondary mechanisms in human motion detection,” Vision Res. 34, 2863–2877 (1994). [CrossRef]
  17. S. S. Wolfson, M. S. Landy, “Discrimination of orientation-defined texture edges,” Vision Res. 35, 2863–2877 (1995). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. S. C. Dakin, I. Mareschal, “Sensitivity to contrast modulation depends on carrier spatial frequency and orientation,” Vision Res. 40, 311–329 (2000). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. F. Wilkinson, H. R. Wilson, “Discrimination of curvilinear patterns: beyond simple cells,” Invest. Ophthalmol. Visual Sci. Suppl. 37, S955 (1996).
  20. D. H. Brainard, “The Psychophysics Toolbox,” Spatial Vision 10, 433–446 (1997). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  21. D. G. Pelli, “The VideoToolbox software for visual psychophysics: transforming numbers into movies,” Spatial Vision 10, 437–442 (1997). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. W. Weibull, “A statistical distribution function of wide applicability,” J. Appl. Mech. 18, 292–297 (1951).
  23. J. Nachmias, “On the psychometric function for contrast detection,” Vision Res. 21, 215–223 (1981). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. A. T. Smith, “The detection of second-order motion,” in Visual Detection of Motion, A. T. Smith, R. J. Snowden, eds. (Academic, London, 1994), pp. 145–176.
  25. A. T. Smith, T. Ledgeway, “Separate detection of moving luminance and contrast modulations: fact or artifact?” Vision Res. 37, 45–62 (1997). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. A. M. Derrington, D. R. Badcock, “Separate detectors for simple and complex grating patterns,” Vision Res. 25, 1869–1878 (1985). [CrossRef]
  27. I. E. Holliday, S. J. Anderson, “Different processes underlie the detection of second-order motion at low and high temporal frequencies,” Proc. R. Soc. London Ser. B 257, 165–173 (1994). [CrossRef]
  28. A. T. Smith, T. Ledgeway, “Sensitivity to second-order motion as a function of temporal frequency and eccentricity,” Vision Res. 38, 403–410 (1998). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. J. M. Zanker, I. S. Hupgens, “Interaction between primary and secondary mechanisms in human motion perception,” Vision Res. 34, 1255–1266 (1994). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

Cited By

Alert me when this paper is cited

OSA is able to provide readers links to articles that cite this paper by participating in CrossRef's Cited-By Linking service. CrossRef includes content from more than 3000 publishers and societies. In addition to listing OSA journal articles that cite this paper, citing articles from other participating publishers will also be listed.

Figures

Fig. 1 Fig. 2 Fig. 3
 
Fig. 4 Fig. 5
 

« Previous Article  |  Next Article »

OSA is a member of CrossRef.

CrossCheck Deposited