OSA's Digital Library

Journal of the Optical Society of America A

Journal of the Optical Society of America A


  • Vol. 18, Iss. 9 — Sep. 1, 2001
  • pp: 2255–2266

Inefficient visual search for second-order motion

Hiroshi Ashida, Adriane E. Seiffert, and Naoyuki Osaka  »View Author Affiliations

JOSA A, Vol. 18, Issue 9, pp. 2255-2266 (2001)

View Full Text Article

Enhanced HTML    Acrobat PDF (495 KB)

Browse Journals / Lookup Meetings

Browse by Journal and Year


Lookup Conference Papers

Close Browse Journals / Lookup Meetings

Article Tools



Visual search rate was used to assess attentional resources required for detection of opposing motions defined either by luminance or by modulations of texture contrast, flicker, or size. Though luminance-based targets were detected quickly, search through second-order motion was slow. Control experiments ruled out stimuli visibility, complexity, eccentricity sensitivity, and attributes of the carrier as possible accounts. Results suggest separate processing of the two types of stimuli: Luminance-based motion is detected by spatiotemporal filters, whereas second-order motion is likely processed by a capacity-limited, later stage. Rate-reducing effects of increased contrast and speed mirrored previous research suggesting that effortful feature tracking may be the mechanism.

© 2001 Optical Society of America

OCIS Codes
(330.4150) Vision, color, and visual optics : Motion detection
(330.5510) Vision, color, and visual optics : Psychophysics

Original Manuscript: November 28, 2000
Revised Manuscript: March 2, 2001
Manuscript Accepted: March 2, 2001
Published: September 1, 2001

Hiroshi Ashida, Adriane E. Seiffert, and Naoyuki Osaka, "Inefficient visual search for second-order motion," J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 18, 2255-2266 (2001)

Sort:  Author  |  Year  |  Journal  |  Reset  


  1. K. Nakayama, G. H. Silverman, “Serial and parallel processing of visual feature conjunctions,” Nature 320, 264–265 (1986). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. J. Driver, P. McLeod, Z. Dienes, “Are direction and speed coded independently by the visual system? Evidence from visual search,” Spatial Vision 6, 133–147 (1992). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. H. C. Nothdurft, “The conspicuousness of orientation and motion contrast,” Spatial Vision 7, 341–363 (1993). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. A. M. Treisman, G. Gelade, “A feature-integration theory of attention,” Cogn. Psychol. 12, 97–136 (1980). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. A. Treisman, “Search, similarity, and integration of features between and within dimensions,” J. Exp. Psychol. Hum. Percep. Perform. 17, 652–676 (1991). [CrossRef]
  6. J. M. Wolfe, “Guided search 2.0: a revised model of visual search,” Psychon. Bull. Rev. 1, 202–238 (1994). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. H. B. Barlow, W. R. Levick, “The mechanism of directionally selective units in rabbit’s retina,” J. Physiol. (London) 178, 477–504 (1965).
  8. D. H. Hubel, T. N. Wiesel, “Receptive fields, binocular interaction and functional architecture in the cat’s visual cortex,” J. Physiol. (London) 160, 106–154 (1962).
  9. E. H. Adelson, J. R. Bergen, “Spatiotemporal energy models for the perception of motion,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 2, 284–299 (1985). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. J. P. H. van Santen, G. Sperling, “Elaborate Reichradt detectors,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 2, 300–321 (1985). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. A. B. Watson, A. J. Ahumada, “Model of human visual-motion sensing,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 2, 322–342 (1985). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. P. Cavanagh, G. Mather, “Motion: the long and short of it,” Spatial Vision 4, 103–129 (1989). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. C. Chubb, G. Sperling, “Drift-balanced random stimuli: a general basis for studying non-Fourier motion perception,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 5, 1986–2007 (1988). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. A. Johnston, P. W. McOwan, H. Buxton, “A computational model of the analysis of some first-order and second-order motion patterns by simple and complex cells,” Proc. R. Soc. London Ser. B 250, 297–306 (1992). [CrossRef]
  15. A. M. Derrington, D. R. Badcock, G. B. Henning, “Discriminating the direction of second-order motion at short stimulus durations,” Vision Res. 33, 1785–1794 (1993). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. A. Pantle, “Immobility of some second-order stimuli in human peripheral vision,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 9, 863–867 (1992). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. J. M. Zanker, “Second-order motion perception in the peripheral visual field,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 14, 1385–1392 (1997). [CrossRef]
  18. A. T. Smith, R. F. Hess, C. L. Baker, “Direction identification thresholds for second-order motion in central and peripheral vision,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 11, 506–514 (1994). [CrossRef]
  19. J. A. Solomon, G. Sperling, “1st- and 2nd-order motion and texture resolution in central and peripheral vision,” Vision Res. 35, 59–64 (1995). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. A. E. Seiffert, P. Cavanagh, “Position displacement, not velocity, is the cue to motion detection of second-order stimuli,” Vision Res. 38, 3569–3582 (1998). [CrossRef]
  21. A. E. Seiffert, P. Cavanagh, “Position-based motion perception for color and texture stimuli: effects of contrast and speed,” Vision Res. 39, 4172–4185 (1999). [CrossRef]
  22. A. M. Derrington, O. I. Ukkonen, “Second-order motion discrimination by feature-tracking,” Vision Res. 39, 1465–1475 (1999). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. O. I. Ukkonen, A. M. Derrington, “Motion of contrast-modulated gratings is analysed by different mechanisms at low and at high contrasts,” Vision Res. 40, 3359–3371 (2000). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. H. Pashler, “Detecting conjunctions of color and form: reassessing the serial search hypothesis,” Percept. Psychophys. 41, 191–201 (1987). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. K. Nakayama, “The iconic bottleneck and the tenuous link between early visual processing and perception,” in Vision: Coding and Efficiency, C. Blakemore, ed. (Cambridge U. Press, Cambridge, UK, 1990), pp. 411–422.
  26. G. D. Logan, “Attention demands of visual search,” Memory Cogn. 6, 446–453 (1978). [CrossRef]
  27. J. T. Townsend, “Serial vs. parallel processing: Sometimes they look like Tweedledum and Tweedledee, but they can (and should) be distinguished,” Psychol. Sci. 1, 46–54 (1990). [CrossRef]
  28. K. Nakayama, J. S. Joseph, “Attention, pattern recognition, and pop-out in visual search,” in The Attentive Brain, R. Parasuraman, ed. (MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass., 1998), pp. 279–298.
  29. P. Cavanagh, “Attention-based motion perception,” Science 257, 1563–1565 (1992). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  30. P. Cavanagh, D. I. MacLeod, S. M. Anstis, “Equiluminance: spatial and temporal factors and the contribution of blue-sensitive cones,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 4, 1428–1438 (1987). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  31. M. M. Chun, J. M. Wolfe, “Just say no: How are visual searches terminated when there is no target present?” Cogn. Psychol. 30, 39–78 (1996). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. P. Verghese, L. S. Stone, “Combining speed information across space,” Vision Res. 35, 2811–2823 (1995). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. P. Verghese, L. S. Stone, “Spatial layout affects speed discrimination,” Vision Res. 37, 397–406 (1997). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. G. M. Wolfe, G. A. Alvarez, T. S. Horowitz, “Attention is fast but volition is slow,” Nature 406, 691 (2000). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. G. F. Woodman, S. J. Luck, “Electrophysiological measurements of rapid shifts of attention during visual search,” Nature 400, 867–869 (1999). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. C. M. Moore, H. Egeth, L. R. Berglan, S. J. Luck, “Are attentional dwell times inconsistent with serial visual search?” Psychon. Bull. Rev. 3, 360–365 (1996). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. J. M. Wolfe, “What can 1 million trials tell us about visual search?” Psychol. Sci. 9, 33–39 (1998). [CrossRef]
  38. D. T. Lindsey, D. Y. Teller, “Motion at isoluminance: discrimination/detection ratios for moving isoluminant gratings,” Vision Res. 30, 1751–1761 (1990). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. A. M. Derrington, G. B. Henning, “Detecting and discriminating the direction of motion of luminance and colour gratings,” Vision Res. 33, 799–811 (1993). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  40. J. D. Victor, M. M. Conte, “Motion mechanisms have only limited access to form information,” Vision Res. 30, 289–301 (1990). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  41. Z.-L. Lu, C. Q. Liu, B. A. Dosher, “Attention mechanisms for multi-location first- and second-order motion perception,” Vision Res. 40, 173–186 (2000). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. P. W. McOwan, A. Johnston, “Motion transparency arises from perceptual grouping: evidence from luminance and contrast modulation motion displays,” Curr. Biol. 6, 1343–1346 (1996). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. B. A. Dosher, M. S. Landy, G. Sperling, “Kinetic depth effect and optic flow: I. 3D shape from Fourier motion,” Vision Res. 29, 1789–1813 (1989). [CrossRef]
  44. H. A. Allen, A. M. Derrington, “Slow discrimination of contrast-defined expansion patterns,” Vision Res. 40, 735–744 (2000). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. O. J. Braddick, “Segmentation versus integration in visual motion processing,” Trends Neurosci. 16, 263–268 (1993). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. M. S. Landy, B. A. Dosher, G. Sperling, M. E. Perkins, “The kinetic depth effect and optic flow: II. First- and second-order motion,” Vision Res. 31, 859–876 (1991). [CrossRef]
  47. M. Ichikawa, H. Ono, S. Nishida, T. Sato, “Depth perception from second order motion yoked to head movement,” Invest. Ophthalmol. Visual Sci. Suppl. 37, 746 (1996).
  48. R. Gurnsey, D. Fleet, C. Potechin, “Second-order motions contribute to vection,” Vision Res. 38, 2801–2816 (1998). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  49. L. R. Harris, A. T. Smith, “Motion defined exclusively by second-order characteristics does not evoke optokinetic nystagmus,” Visual Neurosci. 9, 565–570 (1992). [CrossRef]
  50. H. Ashida, N. Robin, H. Kaneko, F. A. J. Verstraten, S. Ojima, “Second-order motion has little effect on human postural control,” Invest. Ophthalmol. Visual Sci. Suppl. 37, S743 (1997).
  51. Z. L. Lu, G. Sperling, “The functional architecture of human visual motion perception,” Vision Res. 35, 2697–2722 (1995). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  52. R. B. Ivry, A. Cohen, “Dissociation of short- and long-range apparent motion in visual search,” J. Exp. Psychol. Hum. Percept. Perform. 16, 317–331 (1990). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. T. Horowitz, A. Treisman, “Attention and apparent motion,” Spatial Vision 8, 193–219 (1994). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. O. J. Braddick, “Low-level and high-level processes in apparent motion,” Philos. Trans. R. Soc. London Ser. B 290, 137–151 (1980). [CrossRef]
  55. I. E. Holliday, S. J. Anderson, “Different processes underlie the detection of second-order motion at low and high temporal frequencies,” Proc. R. Soc. London Ser. B 257, 165–173 (1994). [CrossRef]
  56. N. E. Scott-Samuel, M. A. Georgeson, “Does early non-linearity account for second-order motion?,” Vision Res. 39, 2853–2865 (1999). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  57. S. J. Anderson, D. C. Burr, “Spatial summation properties of directionally selective mechanisms in human vision,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 8, 1330–1339 (1991). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  58. S. Kastner, H. C. Nothdurft, I. N. Pigarev, “Neuronal responses to orientation and motion contrast in cat striate cortex,” Visual Neurosci. 16, 587–600 (1999). [CrossRef]

Cited By

Alert me when this paper is cited

OSA is able to provide readers links to articles that cite this paper by participating in CrossRef's Cited-By Linking service. CrossRef includes content from more than 3000 publishers and societies. In addition to listing OSA journal articles that cite this paper, citing articles from other participating publishers will also be listed.

« Previous Article  |  Next Article »

OSA is a member of CrossRef.

CrossCheck Deposited