OSA's Digital Library

Journal of the Optical Society of America A

Journal of the Optical Society of America A

| OPTICS, IMAGE SCIENCE, AND VISION

  • Vol. 18, Iss. 9 — Sep. 1, 2001
  • pp: 2267–2272

First-order and second-order signals combine to improve perceptual accuracy

Andrew T. Smith and Nicholas E. Scott-Samuel  »View Author Affiliations


JOSA A, Vol. 18, Issue 9, pp. 2267-2272 (2001)
http://dx.doi.org/10.1364/JOSAA.18.002267


View Full Text Article

Enhanced HTML    Acrobat PDF (274 KB)





Browse Journals / Lookup Meetings

Browse by Journal and Year


   


Lookup Conference Papers

Close Browse Journals / Lookup Meetings

Article Tools

Share
Citations

Abstract

The question of whether first-order (luminance-defined) and second-order (contrast-defined) stimuli can be combined in order to improve perceptual accuracy was examined in the context of two suprathreshold discrimination experiments, one spatial and the other temporal. The stimuli were either gratings of one type of image alone or else the sum of two gratings of the same orientation, spatial frequency, temporal frequency, and phase, but of different types. For both spatial frequency discrimination (static gratings) and speed discrimination (1-c/deg drifting gratings), performance was markedly better for a combined grating stimulus than predicted on the basis of independent processing of the two types of stimulus. But this was true only for stimuli of low contrast. Facilitation of discrimination performance occurred only in the contrast range where discrimination performance is contrast dependent. At higher contrasts, where performance has reached an asymptote for each type of pattern alone, there was no facilitation. The results suggest that first- and second-order stimuli, although believed by most researchers to be detected separately, can subsequently be combined in order to improve perceptual accuracy in conditions of low visibility.

© 2001 Optical Society of America

OCIS Codes
(330.0330) Vision, color, and visual optics : Vision, color, and visual optics
(330.4150) Vision, color, and visual optics : Motion detection
(330.5510) Vision, color, and visual optics : Psychophysics
(330.6100) Vision, color, and visual optics : Spatial discrimination
(330.6790) Vision, color, and visual optics : Temporal discrimination

History
Original Manuscript: November 30, 2000
Revised Manuscript: April 16, 2001
Manuscript Accepted: April 16, 2001
Published: September 1, 2001

Citation
Andrew T. Smith and Nicholas E. Scott-Samuel, "First-order and second-order signals combine to improve perceptual accuracy," J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 18, 2267-2272 (2001)
http://www.opticsinfobase.org/josaa/abstract.cfm?URI=josaa-18-9-2267


Sort:  Author  |  Year  |  Journal  |  Reset  

References

  1. A. M. Derrington, D. R. Badcock, “Separate detectors for simple and complex patterns?” Vision Res. 25, 1869–1878 (1985). [CrossRef]
  2. C. Chubb, G. Sperling, “Two motion perception mechanisms revealed through distance-driven reversal of apparent motion,” Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 86, 2985–2989 (1989). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. G. Mather, S. West, “Evidence for second-order motion detectors,” Vision Res. 33, 1109–1112 (1993). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. T. Ledgeway, A. T. Smith, “Evidence for separate motion-detecting mechanisms for first- and second-order motion in human vision,” Vision Res. 34, 2727–2740 (1994). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. A. T. Smith, T. Ledgeway, “Separate detection of moving luminance and contrast modulations: fact or artifact?” Vision Res. 37, 45–62 (1997). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. S. Nishida, T. Ledgeway, M. Edwards, “Dual multiple-scale processing for motion in the human visual system,” Vision Res. 37, 2685–2698 (1997). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. N. E. Scott-Samuel, M. A. Georgeson, “Does early non-linearity account for second-order motion?” Vision Res. 39, 2853–2865 (1999). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. A. T. Smith, “The detection of second-order motion,” in Visual Detection of Motion, A. T. Smith, R. J. Snowden, eds. (Academic, London, 1994), pp. 145–176.
  9. H. Northdurft, “Orientation sensitivity and texture segmentation in patterns with different line orientation,” Vision Res. 25, 551–560 (1985). [CrossRef]
  10. B. Julesz, “Textons, the elements of texture perception, and their interactions,” Nature 290, 91–97 (1981). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. R. Gray, D. Regan, “Spatial frequency discrimination and detection characteristics for gratings defined by orientation texture,” Vision Res. 38, 2601–2617 (1998). [CrossRef]
  12. F. W. Campbell, J. G. Robson, “Application of Fourier analysis to the visibility of gratings,” J. Physiol. 197, 551–566 (1968). [PubMed]
  13. D. Regan, Human Perception of Objects (Sinauer, Sunderland, Mass., 2000).
  14. A. J. Schofield, M. A. Georgeson, “Sensitivity to modulations of luminance and contrast in visual white noise: separate mechanisms with similar behaviour,” Vision Res. 39, 2697–2716 (1999). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. G. E. Legge, J. M. Foley, “Contrast masking in human vision,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. 70, 1458–1471 (1980). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. D. Regan, S. Bartol, T. Murray, K. Beverley, “Spatial frequency discrimination in normal vision and in patients with multiple sclerosis,” Brain 105, 735–754 (1982). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. J. Thomas, “Underlying psychometric function for detecting gratings and identifying spatial frequency,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. 73, 751–758 (1983). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. S. F. Bowne, “Contrast discrimination cannot explain spatial frequency, orientation or temporal frequency resolution,” Vision Res. 30, 449–461 (1990). [CrossRef]
  19. L.-M. Lin, H. R. Wilson, “Fourier and non-Fourier pattern discrimination compared,” Vision Res. 36, 1907–1918 (1996). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. S. P. McKee, G. Silverman, K. Nakayama, “Precise velocity discrimination despite random variations in temporal frequency and contrast,” Vision Res. 26, 609–619 (1986). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  21. G. Orban, J. D. Wolf, H. Maes, “Factors influencing velocity coding in the human visual system,” Vision Res. 24, 33–39 (1984). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. S. C. Panish, “Velocity discrimination at constant multiples of threshold contrast,” Vision Res. 28, 193–201 (1988). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. K. Turano, A. Pantle, “On the mechanism that encodes the movement of contrast variations: velocity discrimination,” Vision Res. 29, 207–221 (1989). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. S. J. Cropper, “Velocity discrimination in chromatic gratings and beats,” Vision Res. 34, 41–48 (1994). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. A. Johnston, C. P. Benton, “Speed discrimination thresholds for first- and second-order bars and edges,” Vision Res. 37, 2217–2226 (1997). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. N. Scott-Samuel, A. Smith, “No local cancellation between directionally opposed first-order and second-order motion signals,” Vision Res. 40, 3495–3500 (2000). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. C. Chubb, G. Sperling, “Drift-balanced random stimuli: a general basis for studying non-Fourier motion perception,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 5, 1986–2006 (1988). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. T. Ledgeway, “Adaptation to second-order motion results in a motion aftereffect for directionally-ambiguous test stimuli,” Vision Res. 34, 2879–2889 (1994). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. T. Ledgeway, A. T. Smith, “Changes in perceived speed following adaptation to first-order and second-order motion,” Vision Res. 37, 215–224 (1997). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  30. H. R. Wilson, V. P. Ferrera, C. Yo, “A psychophysically motivated model for two-dimensional motion perception,” Visual Neurosci. 9, 79–97 (1992). [CrossRef]
  31. N. Scott-Samuel, A. Smith, “Greater than the sum of its parts: first- and second-order stimuli combine to improve perceptual accuracy for both motion and form,” Invest. Ophthalmol. Visual Sci. Suppl. 40, S425 (1999).

Cited By

Alert me when this paper is cited

OSA is able to provide readers links to articles that cite this paper by participating in CrossRef's Cited-By Linking service. CrossRef includes content from more than 3000 publishers and societies. In addition to listing OSA journal articles that cite this paper, citing articles from other participating publishers will also be listed.

Figures

Fig. 1 Fig. 2 Fig. 3
 
Fig. 4
 

« Previous Article  |  Next Article »

OSA is a member of CrossRef.

CrossCheck Deposited